Scientific method approach to false prophecies

by DS211 9 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  DS211

  Scientific method

  The process of proposing a hypothesis, and then testing its accuracy by collecting data on events the hypothesis predicts. If the predictions match the new data the hypothesis is supported. Generally the best supported hypothesis is considered correct.

  inreference to 1914,1915,1918, 1925,1930's, 1975, 2000,etc...its quite simple by applying this method to see that the WT is inaccurate. Period! it shows its dishonesty, lack of validity and impossible for veruficatikn, specifically Christs "parousia" in 1914-1918.
• 

  rmt1

  They have applied the scientific method to the best way to lie, the most optimal lies, the most efficient method of diseminating lies, the best way to prevent the discovery of lies. They are absolutely scientific in how they harness, leverage, exploit human weakness. They crack the human soul to produce a dollar the way a nuclear engineer cracks an atom to produce a joule.
• 

  DS211

  Exactly and yet theyve failed to the awake JW just the way the truth comes to a person who finds out theres not truth to afalsified scientific research project...we just have to spread the news
• 

  Finkelstein

  But false prophecies sell literature, so lying and conjuring up false and misleading proclamations helps in a big way in proliferating literature.
• 

  prologos

  never thought of it that way.

  russe, ruminations were PRINTED to contradict the old light from the churches,

  the FADS of 1919 fantasies were PRINTED to correct russel.

  Funny Freddy Franz new light Printed was in a class by itself,

  The GB/FADS of 2013 keeps at it with Fresh light.

  Their past errors is the energy, the food, that powers the wt.

  so:

  Only old false doctrines keeps WT going.

  If the truth would be known, ther would be no Wt.
• 

  rmt1

  Interesting. I appreciate hypotheses that seek to explain or model how it is that the JW leadership do what they do and get away with it, since it defies all reasoning and present (2013) models or examples of self-generated thoughts or self-directed action. Being as they are one of the most self-referential systems, Ptolemaic in the extreme, asserting that all events of the world center on them like celestial spheres, it is consistent to add a time dimension to their sense of entitlement, and model things as you say - "Their past errors is the energy, the food, that powers the wt." So to that extent (who knows what fractional component) they don't even require any present adversaries. They are 'their own worst enemy'.
• 

  prologos

  In the domain of science, previous laws, theories retain value,

  Keplers 3 laws still hold for small body' motions, see ISON,

  newtons laws still hold for orbital mechanics. ad so on, but

  WT predictions are value less,

  less and less as we pass through time.

  There is other energy sources that wt feeds on, the contributions ,time of the gullible, the trapped,

  the power hungry

  but the drive to PUBLISH is fed by the

  wrong set-up of the past.
• 

  rmt1

  http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/planned-obsolescence-as-myth-or-reality/?_r=0

  "In a notable paper from 1986, Jeremy Bulow asserted that a monopolist not threatened by entry would have an incentive to produce goods with “inefficiently short useful lives.” But if consumers have the option to switch to good substitutes — as arguably they do now in the smartphone market — the incentives could run in the opposite direction. Your company might capture a larger share of the market if consumers believe your products are more durable."

  They have to stay just one camel straw ahead of "who will we go to?" That's all the specification they have to engineer to. To do that they have to devalue their previous doctrine products in order to make the new doctrine products more paletable, but those new doctrine products still have to be conspicuously costly for the weak-minded or the socially-hostage to feel they can only come from a superhuman source. The GB are handpicked (by who knows what metric) to sustain a reality distortion field.

  Apologies for pointing at the engieering and not the science.
• 

  DS211

  Its ok i dont discriminate between science, engineering and reakistic humanitarianism...whatever shit is, it is..period

  i wish i wouldve seen the truth 4 years ago...feck!
• 

  prologos

  When I was in school in the 40, in central Europe, the papers of einstein, the music of mendelson, all were not mentioned by pain of disfellowshipping (its equivalent). The standard radio, "Volksempfaenger" would not get the BBC. similarly,

  WT tries to block the free flow of information about it's product, it's science, it's (mind)engineering.