When a teaches is changed the wt cites: Proverbs 4:18.
Now Russell is the "messenger", ex "wise and faithful servant". He as God Messenger write this:
**** w1881 february pág. 188 párr. 1 ****
If we were following a man undoubtedly it would be different
with us; undoubtedly one human idea would contradict
another and that which was light one or two or six years
ago would be regarded as darkness now: But with God there
is no variableness, neither shadow of turning, and so it is with
truth; any knowledge or light coming from God must be
like its author. A new view of truth never can contradict
a former truth. “New light” never extinguishes older “light,”
but adds to it. If you were lighting up a building containing
seven gas jets you would not extinguish one every
time you lighted another, but would add one light to another
and they would be in harmony and thus give increase of light:
So is it with the light of truth; the true increase is by adding
to, not by substituting one for another.
The actual uses of Proverbs 4:18 is increasing the light "substituting one for another" instead "adding to" contradicting to the messenger.
If Proverbs 4:18 applies only to life style, and not to the teaches, why wt cites Proverbs 4:18?
and if Russells is the messenger of God, why wt contradict to the messenger of god in the use of Proverbs 4:18?