Elders Ordered to Give Evidence in Sex Scandal Trial

by jw07 9 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • jw07
    jw07

    Did you see this?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2365992/Gordon-Leighton-child-abuse-trial-orders-Jehovahs-Witness-leaders-evidence.html

    Church elders refused to comment on a child abuse scandal because they had a 'duty to God' to keep the sex attacker's confession a secret, a court heard.

    Jehovah Witness ministerial servant Gordon Leighton admitted sexually abusing a child when he was confronted with allegations before elders at his church,Newcastle Crown Court heard.

    But during the official police investigation the 53-year-old, who hit the headlines in the 1990s when his wife Yvonne, 28, died after refusing a blood transfusion after childbirth on religious grounds, denied any illegal wrongdoing.

    When detectives asked elders Simon Preyser, Harry Logan and David Scott to make statements about the confession, all three refused and said what they had heard was confidential.

    The elders knew about the admissions for three years, but refused to cooperate with the criminal investigation, the court heard.

    The trio kept that stance when the case was brought before Newcastle Crown Court. Each was then issued with a witness summons.

    They then launched a court battle against the summonses but were ordered to testify by Judge Penny Moreland after months of legal wrangling.

    Their barrister Richard Daniels said the men had a 'duty to God' not to breach confidence.

    He added: 'Privileged communication between members of the congregation and ministers is an absolute right and duty and there is no power in law to breach such a confidence.'

    Judge Moreland made an order that the men must reveal what they heard and said: “It is apparent that the three elders who were present when this conversation took place are in possession of relevant evidence as to a point which is of real significance in this case.

    'They claim the right of confidentiality, they claim that what they heard said by the defendant during the course of that meeting ought to be subject to privilege, as ministers of religion.'

    Judge Moreland refused to withdraw the summonses and said: 'Public interest is clearly in favour of this evidence being given.

    'What was said by the defendant on that occasion is of great significance in the trial.'

    Jehovah Witness church elder Harry Logan who gave evidence in the trial of Gordon Leighton who was found guiltyJehovah Witness church elder Harry Logan and Simon Preyser (right) who gave evidence in the trial of Gordon Leighton who was found guilty

    Jehovah Witness church elder Harry Logan and Simon Preyser (right) who gave evidence in the trial of Gordon Leighton who was found guilty

    Jehovah Witness Church Elder David Scott at Newcastle Crown Court

    Jehovah Witness Church Elder David Scott at Newcastle Crown Court

    Despite the judge’s ruling, the men refused to make statements to police until just hours before they were called as witnesses before the jury.

    Leighton, who has since been expelled from the church at Lampton Kingdom Hall in Washington, Wearside, denied two charges of indecency with a child and seven of indecent assault.

    He was yesterday found guilty of two charges of indecency with a child and six of indecent assault.

    He was found not guilty of one indecent assault charge, on the direction of the judge.

    Judge Moreland remanded him in custody until August 23, when he will be sentenced.

    The judge told him: 'You know, I am sure, that the inevitable sentence is one of immediate and lengthy custody.

    'You will be remanded in custody in the meantime.'

    Prosecutor Katherine Dunn told the court it was in 2009 the victim broke her silence about what Leighton had done to her.

    The court heard at a special meeting, aimed at 'keeping the congregation clean', Leighton 'admitted sexual abuse' and made excuses for his vile behaviour.

    Miss Dunn said: 'The elders conducted their own investigation.

    'A meeting was arranged and the defendant was confronted with the allegations.

    'After initially denying the allegations he broke down and admitted sexually abusing the complainant.'

    The court heard Leighton, from Ayton, refused to answer any questions when interviewed by detectives and claimed his confession at the meeting was limited to masturbation and reading pornographic material.

    Throughout the six day trial Leighton denied all allegations against him and denied he had confessed to the elders.

    He told jurors: 'It never happened.

    'It’s all untrue.'

    Leighton had also denied unrelated assault charges, which he was found guilty of.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2365992/Gordon-Leighton-child-abuse-trial-orders-Jehovahs-Witness-leaders-evidence.html#ixzz2ZHFFC2ik
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    all three refused and said what they had heard was confidential

    You can bet that the confession was not treated as confidential when it came to the elders reporting the confession to the branch office. Clergy-penitent privilege therefore should not apply, because the 'confession' was not actually confidential.

  • westiebilly11
    westiebilly11

    sharer of the sin...

  • Anony Mous
    Anony Mous

    Clergy-penitent privilege does not exist in common law (which is what US/UK law is based on). That's why they could be compelled to testify.

  • truthhurts13
    truthhurts13

    Wouldn't pee on them if they were on fire

  • Barrold Bonds
    Barrold Bonds

    FYI: The Daily Mail is a crazy tabloid. I'd wait for a more legit source.

  • besty
    besty

    the story is 100% legit.

    its on Sky News and many other local news sources - Google "Gordon Leighton child sex abuse"

  • Giordano
    Giordano

    I agree besty it is straight forward....jail his fat ass.

  • truth_b_known
    truth_b_known

    When I got my first cop job one of our detectives was investigating a child abuse case involving a Witness in the congregation in our city. One of the elders on his committee used to be in my congregation and was subpoena dodging. I served him myself. I just wished I had waited to do it at a meeting.

  • Iown Mylife
    Iown Mylife

    Those duty-to-God jerks have got to be totally out of their minds. It is INSANITY.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit