Comparing GB to the past leaders.

by punkofnice 2 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  punkofnice

  Charlie Rissole had some weird ideas that were probably about par for the course in his day.

  Rutherford was a bullying propagandist.

  Knorr was a business man that spouted crap.

  F Franz was a crackpot theologian.

  What of the GB today. Are they any different to previous cult leaders?

  Yes, I can see they are self agrandising despots full of their own importance. In love with themselves and feathering their nest for the future because Armageddon isn't coming...never was and never will.

  Would you say their leadership is any less crackpot than the filth that came before them?

  Are they more controlling? After all they have assumed total control.

  Is the protection of paedophiles anymore or less than over the years?

  What are your thoughts on the paedophile loving filth that's known as the Governing Body compared to previous dictators?
• 

  Room 215

  Rutherford was a conniving scoundrel, but also a spellbinding orator; Franz was an eccentric, wild-eyed screecher, but a writer with an extraordinary flair for imagery; neither of these two guys, nor Knorr, had an aversion to publicity or to cultivating a colorful public persona.

  The current lot come across as a singularly unimpressive, reclusive, unremarkable collection of nonentities, intellectual lightweights; mediocrities.
• 

  punkofnice

  Room215 - I get the impression that the current GB are just puppets for whoever is in the background pulling the strings.