i have seen so many references to "true cristians". it is kind of an annoyance. the comment usually starts with, "well true christians" or something seperating one class of cheistian against a "not tru christian".
see the thing is that the "true christians" have to claim the "not true christians" because they all study the same book. example, i recently tripped up a jw acuaintince by asking if he supports westboro baptist. they preach an unpopular dogma in the public square. takin the message to the street so to speak. the look on the face of this acuaintince was awesome. he had to agree that they did "gods work" but quickly tried to distance his brand of christianity.
im not for long coherent posts so my question is must all "true christians" defend benny hinn, westboro, or jim jones? why or why not might they be true christians?