European Court of Human Rights: Jehovah's Witnesses v. Armenia (application no. 23978/06)

by jwleaks 3 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • jwleaks
    jwleaks

    JW LEAKS has published the November 27, 2012, judgment from the European Court of Human Rights in:

    Khachatryan and Others (Jehovah’s Witnesses) v. Armenia

    Application no. 23978/06

    EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

    Khachatryan and Others (Jehovah’s Witnesses) v. Armenia

    Application no. 23978/06

    The applicants are 19 Armenian nationals who are Jehovah’s Witnesses. Having applied to the authorities to perform alternative labour service instead of military service on religious grounds under the 2004 Alternative Service Act, they were each assigned to perform the service in various institutions such as hospitals, nursing homes and dispensaries. In May and June 2005, they respectively informed those institutions that, since the alternative service was under the control of the military, they could not continue to serve in good conscience, and subsequently left their places of service.

    Placed in detention for several months following criminal proceedings brought against them for abandoning their service institutions – which had eventually been discontinued – 17 of the applicants complained that they had been detained for an act which had not constituted an offence at the time, in breach of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Further relying in particular on Article 5 § 5 (right to compensation for unlawful detention) they complained that they had been denied compensation for their unlawful detention.

    The full 30 page judgment can be downloaded from JW Leaks.

    www.jwleaks.org

    JW LEAKS

  • zeb
    zeb

    which way do they want it? The brothers in Mexico (iam told) obtained false documents to say they had done their mil service, The WTS was quite happy with this.

    Would the GB like to travel to Armenia and spend some time in the prison there.?

  • BroMac
    BroMac

    hospitals nursing homes and dispensaries (medicine, medical supplies). make a rod for their own back and cry to the courts. because its under the control of the military???

    notice how it is worded:

    In May and June 2005, they respectively informed those institutions that, since the alternative service was under the control of the military, they could not continue to serve in good conscience, and subsequently left their places of service.

    like it is Their choice. No. they are Given a choice.

    what was the judgement in the case?

  • Refriedtruth
    Refriedtruth

    The award was 112,00 euros which I believe (may be wrong?) is about $146,000

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit