Has anyone read any interesting "discussion" regarding revisions on Wikipedia topics regarding JWs?
If you have gone over the revisions and discussions and found some insight worth knowing please share.
Anyone Tracking Revisions of JW Topics On Wikipedia?
by scotoma 4 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
-
Refriedtruth
Bump this thread,lets keep a vigil on 'vandalism' by JW trolls.
Wiki is highest rank in web searches but due to the 'open source' editing it can be compromised (hacked) good example is go to Scientology's wiki page.
-
cedars
I would be interested in knowing if there are any Wiki-guardians out there making sure the facts are presented honestly.
You never know just how far the Society's influence stretches, and since they appear to be reluctantly beginning to embrace the internet, we need to make sure they keep their dirty hands off Wikipedia.
Cedars
-
scotoma
I just read one correction. Someone wrote that the Governing Body has the "final" word when it comes to doctrine.
Somebody objected to the word "final" because it implied some sort of open discussion of doctrinal questions. The individual said the word final should be removed because there is no one else involved in their decision.
That was a recent revision.