Hey y'all check this out

by cellomould 4 Replies latest jw friends

  • cellomould
    cellomould

    I pulled this from
    http://www.ewg.org/pressreleases/capr20010928.html

    California Farmers Could Reap $185 Million in U.S. House Showdown on Subsidy Reform
    House Vote Next Week Pits Status Quo Vs. Fairness & Conservation
    WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 - Most California counties would get at least a $1 million boost in federal farm aid under a plan that would distribute crop subsidies more fairly while helping farmers protect the environment, according to an Environmental Working Group analysis of U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

    EWG found that total federal farm aid would likely increase in 47 of the state's 58 counties under the reform plan. Statewide, total federal farm aid would increase by almost 12 percent. (See a county-by-county table)

    All counties would receive more for programs that pay farmers to not sell their land to developers, maintain wetlands and wildlife habitat, and reduce pesticide runoff. But 35 counties would get at least $1 million more for conservation over the next five years, and statewide conservation funding would increase by more than $185 million.

    More than $170 billion will be on the table next week when the House votes on the farm bill (HR 2646). The showdown will be between a status-quo proposal that continues to give a grossly disproportionate share of subsidies to wealthy growers of a few major commodities, and an amendment that grants a fair share to family farms and the growers of smaller speciality crops. The reform amendment would also shift billions from subsidies to conservation funding.

    "Right now, most federal aid is going to large agribusiness corporations and absentee owners - not struggling family farmers," said Bill Walker, California director of EWG, which is working to increase conservation spending in the farm bill. "The reform plan will bring greater fairness to farm policy."

    An Associated Press analysis of USDA records found that although California is the nattion's leading farm state, it ranks only 12th as a recipient of federal farm aid. California farmers received $812 million of the $27 billion doled out to U.S. farms last year. By comparison, Iowa, which produces less than half of California's agricultural bounty, received $2.7 billion.

    California needs some attention!
    cellomould

    "In other words, your God is the warden of a prison where the only prisoner is your God." Jose Saramago, The Gospel According to Jesus Christ

  • larc
    larc

    Cello,

    Question: Why should the tax payers have to give subsidies to farmers in the first place? I don't get it.

  • cellomould
    cellomould

    I am not sure how it all began, Larc,
    but currently big agriculture is reaping the benefits of these subsidies. That's the problem.

    I do think money should be spent helping companies see and benefit from the advantages of environment conciousness.

    In our experience, the little guys (i.e. farmers) tend to do less damage to the environment around them. But as we see, it is not really prudent to simply bet on the little guy.

    Sustainable growth should be investigated more fully, because our population continues to grow. Corporations will have to get bigger to become more efficient.

    I haven't really said anything new and exciting, but it's quite obvious that it's in our best interests to look further into the future. Including what we do with farmland, as we will have many more mouths to feed...

    cellomould

    "In other words, your God is the warden of a prison where the only prisoner is your God." Jose Saramago, The Gospel According to Jesus Christ

  • Imbue
    Imbue

    Farm subsidies result in lower food prices; in many parts of the world persons pay more 1/3 to 1/5 their income for food. In the US we pay considerably less and have more disposable income.

    Right or wrong this is the result of farm subsidies otherwise food prices wouldn't be so stable. The discussion of farm subsidies goes back to the reconstruction period.

    Crazy is doing the same thing over and over again when it doesn't work.

  • larc
    larc

    Cello,

    Farmers are not "little guys" any more. A farm today is a midsize to large business. Subsidies are another form of corporate welfare, which I know you oppose.

    Question: How does handing cash to a farmer, do anything for our long term welfare, or for the welfare of the land itself?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit