Why God Never Received a PhD

by Earnest 5 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  Earnest

  I am a believer in God and would like to assure those other believers on this forum that no disrespect is intended by this post. I just found it amusing and so am sharing it :

  1. He had only one major publication.
  2. It wasn't in English.
  3. It had no references.
  4. It wasn't published in a refereed journal.
  5. Some even doubt he wrote it by himself.
  6. It may be true that he created the world, but what has he done since then?
  7. His cooperative efforts have been quite limited.
  8. The scientific community has had a hard time replicating his results.
  9. He never applied to the ethics board for permission to use human subjects.
  10. When one experiment went awry he tried to cover it up by drowning his subjects.
  11. When subjects didn't behave as predicted, he deleted them from the sample.
  12. He rarely came to class, just told students to read the book.
  13. Some say he had his son teach the class.
  14. He expelled his first two students for learning.
  15. Although there were only ten requirements, most of his students failed his tests.
  16. His office hours were infrequent and usually held on a mountain top.
  17. No record of working well with colleagues.
• 

  mP

  I think you forget the main reason, he doesnt exist.

  Actually "God" wrote many books, there are over fifty gospels about Jesus, its just the Catholics ignored most of them because they are obviously stupid.
• 

  TOTH

  I thought you were gonna say that the Watchtower refused to let him go to school.

  I like your post!
• 

  tec

  The scientific community has had a hard time replicating his results.

  This one gave me a chuckle.

  peace,

  tammy
• 

  Disillusioned Lost-Lamb

  Don't forget he continually allows other far less superior idiots to do his thinking/homework for him.
• 

  Earnest

  Thanks for your comments.

  @Toth I agree that [18] could be something like "His wife was against tertiary education", although "wife" embraces far more than the remnant on earth.

  @mP As we are talking about the rigours of scientific scholarship, I consider certainty that he doesn't exist a matter of blind faith and lacking any scientific support at all. To suggest that he may or may not exist allows for evidence that may still be forthcoming as we learn more about the universe. To go beyond that is subjective and has nothing to do with science.