The Bomb Buried Inside Obama Care Goes Off Today

by Justitia Themis 5 Replies latest social current

  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    The Bomb Buried In Obamacare

    + Comment now

    I have long argued that the impact of the Affordable Care Act is not nearly as big of a deal as opponents would have you believe. At the end of the day, the law is – in the main – little more than a successful effort to put an end to some of the more egregious health insurer abuses while creating an environment that should bring more Americans into programs that will give them at least some of the health care coverage they need.

    There is, however, one notable exception – and it’s one that should have a long lasting and powerful impact on the future of health care in our country.That would be the provision of the law, called the medical loss ratio, that requires health insurance companies to spend 80% of the consumers’ premium dollars they collect—85% for large group insurers—on actual medical care rather than overhead, marketing expenses and profit. Failure on the part of insurers to meet this requirement will result in the insurers having to send their customers a rebate check representing the amount in which they underspend on actual medical care.

    This is the true ‘bomb’ contained in Obamacare and the one item that will have more impact on the future of how medical care is paid for in this country than anything we’ve seen in quite some time. Indeed, it is this aspect of the law that represents the true ‘death panel’ found in Obamacare—but not one that is going to lead to the death of American consumers. Rather, the medical loss ratio will, ultimately, lead to the death of large parts of the private, for-profit health insurance industry.

    Why? Because there is absolutely no way for-profit health insurers are going to be able to learn how to get by and still make a profit while being forced to spend at least 80 percent of their receipts providing their customers with the coverage for which they paid. If they could, we likely would never have seen the extraordinary efforts made by these companies to avoid paying benefits to their customers at the very moment they need it the most.

    Today, that bomb goes off.

    Today, the Department of Health & Human Services issues the rules of what insurer expenditures will—and will not—qualify as a medical expense for purposes of meeting the requirement.

    As it turns out, HHS isn’t screwing around. They actually mean to see to it that the insurance companies spend what they should taking care of their customers.

    Here’s an example: For months, health insurance brokers and salespeople have been lobbying to have the commissions they earn for selling an insurer’s program to consumers be included as a ‘medical expense’ for purposes of the rules. HHS has, today, given them the official thumbs down, as well they should have. Selling me a health insurance policy is simply not the same as providing me with the medical care I am entitled to under the policy. Sales is clearly an overhead cost in any business and had HHS included this as a medical cost, it would have signaled that they are not at all serious about enforcing the concept of the medical loss ratio.

    So, can private health insurance companies manage to make a profit when they actually have to spend premium receipts taking care of their customers’ health needs as promised?

    The article continues on to the next page; click the link to continue reading: http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2011/12/02/the-bomb-buried-in-obamacare-explodes-today-halleluja/

  • designs
    designs

    Wellpoint is a classic case of crying losses and raising dividends, Cooked Books anyone?

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    While I do think the Healthcare Act has some provisions that can (and hopefully will) lead to single payer, I think this article is a bit hyperbolic on the subject. Here's why:

    " So, can private health insurance companies manage to make a profit when they actually have to spend premium receipts taking care of their customers’ health needs as promised?"

    The answer I believe is "yes". 15 to 20% profit, guaranteed? No intelligent person would turn that kind of money down.

    Single payer will come to your homestate eventually because the law says it must by 2017 and since it must, states will want to be competative with states like Vermont, which is pushing through to implement single payer by 2014.

    And then all bets are off, because it does become harder and harder for insurance companies to keep customers when there is a good single payer system they have to compete with.

    Something occured to me yesterday; ask yourself this question: If the heads of all the largest health insurance companies in America, looking forward 10 or 20 years, had seen that there was virtually a 100% chance that they would be completely out of business by the year 2021, would they have acted at all differently in the fight over American healthcare reform that took place last year?

    I think the answer is "no". That's the business they are in. Amassing 10 years of million dollar salaries is waaaaay preferable to being out of a job in an industry that no longer exist.

  • FlyingHighNow
    FlyingHighNow

    Something sure has to happen to place a cap on their monstrous greed. .

  • serendipity
    serendipity

    I guess the days of an insurance company paying $1Billion in severance to get rid of it's CEO will be over. About time.

  • designs
    designs

    McKesson Corp. was just fined for overcharging on the price of 1400 prescription drugs. McKesson CEO you will recall received a Bonus of $44,000,000.00. The fine from the Federal Court was for $151,000,000.00. McKesson was overcharging millions of individuals during the worse years of the Recession and through programs like Medicaid and Medicare. Who are at the heart of gutting efforts against Medicare- members of Congress like Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor who cry to the media that these Socialist programs are out of control in their spending without mentioning the abusers of the program and knowing this lawsuit was going through the courts..

    The McKesson fine is a small amount to the actual dollars paid by Medicare and Medicaid for this fraud. These potential fines are calculated by the number crunchers at these Corporations in Loss Risk Ratios.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit