YouKnow, this ones for YOU! :)

by 2SYN 8 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • 2SYN
    2SYN

    Sorry, I would have posted this as an addition to this thread:

    (YouKnow and his bad associations)
    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/post.asp?id=270923&method=reply&site=3

    but it would have gotten lost in all the flames!

    YK, do you HONESTLY believe that a bunch of stupid Jihad-D00dZ flew 2 747s into the WTC buildings??? Come on! Everybody knows that Boeing (sp?) have been building blind-landing mechanisms into their aircraft since the 80s...and if you look at the way ole Bush is grabbing power right now and solidifying the US position in Central Asia, you'll begin to see the edges of the conspiracy.

    For crying out loud, it's obvious! OK, try this one on for size: (I'm not certain when this happened, I've forgotten all the dates, but happen it DID, you can go look it up) NORAD took about 10 minutes (maybe less - I'm estimating here) to intercept a small private Learjet owned by a businessman when he switched off his radar transponder. This happened over a relatively low-population region of Florida. NORAD had a fighter escort next that Learjet in 10 minutes, and yet they couldn't go after a 747? Those planes were flying loose and free in the sky, man. Probably there WERE Jihad-do0DZ on board each plane (very likely indeed, as a cover), but I doubt that they knew quite what they were getting into.

    According to press reports, people who saw the planes flying as they maneuvered (sp?) to fly into the towers remarked that they were being flown "like fighter jets", and a former commercial pilot was reported saying that "it's incredibly difficult to fly a plane that big in a tight circle like that!". 747s are larger than many suburban homes, and you expect me to believe that a bunch of Islamic extremists with a bad grudge against Britney Spears (no offense, LB ) and all other wholesome American thingies could fly them like that? After failing to fly tiny Cessnas in their flight training schools? Instructors from those flight schools have been quoted saying in unison that those guys simply couldn't FLY! And you expect us to believe they could pilot the astronomically more difficult to control 747 airliner into a building? With zero previous experience? Uh-huh! Right on, mate!

    Another thing: Why was the WTC sealed off for so long? Nobody except certain elite FBI officials and fire-fighters (and apparently a few Elders, heehee) were allowed in. Why is this? Very fishy indeed, eh? Were they afraid somebody would come across something suspicious?

    And didn't it look very neat when those MONSTROUSLY HUGE buildings folded in on themselves? To me it looked almost like one of those planned demolitions that engineers arrange when they want to make a building disappear. Enough explosives planted at strategic points would have weakened their structures considerably, and made them implode in the desired fashion. I read a study (sorry, lost the link) where it was stated that the WTC Towers were built to withstand the impact of a 737 (smaller than a 747, but not by much). So how come they just drooped over that way?

    Also, don't you think that a terrorist would have researched the NORAD papers (which are publically available) on the Learjet incident in Florida (which itself was just a misunderstanding combined with faulty radar gear, but resulted in a two-hour long flight being escorted all the way to a nearby airport by fighters) and realized that they must hijack an airplane from an airport nearer to New York, such as Kennedy? Those planes were in the air for nearly 80 minutes - and it took NORAD all of 10-19 minutes to respond to a tiny civilian private jet. Any Jihad-D00d worth his salt would have carefully researched the window of time he would have before the 747 he hijacked would have military planes up it's jet intakes and firing warning-shots of non-lethal tracers across the front of the cockpit (standard military procedure BTW!), and would have realized that he needed to hijack a plane from a NEARBY airport, not one much further away.

    By the looks of it, somebody didn't want those planes to be intercepted by military aircraft.

    I'm not even going to start on what happened to the plane that crashed in Pittsburgh, or the fact that many people at Ground Zero heard multiple explosions after the planes hit.

    Whew! Had to get that out of my system!

    The earlier in the forenoon you take the sun bath, the greater will be the beneficial effect, because you get more of the ultra-violet rays, which are healing. - The Golden Age

  • avengers
    avengers

    I didn't know a 747 crashed into the WTC.
    According to me there's never been a 747 that crashed into those towers. Get your facts straight!

  • 2SYN
    2SYN

    Oh OOPS! I was just ranting when I banged out that post. What I really meant was a LARGE COMMERCIAL PASSENGER JET. Sorry Avengers. When I have conversations I usually use '747' instead of "Large Commercial Passenger Jet" for brevity, and this carries over into my writing...argh...

    The earlier in the forenoon you take the sun bath, the greater will be the beneficial effect, because you get more of the ultra-violet rays, which are healing. - The Golden Age

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    Syn

    I followed the wtc thing carefully. I corroborate everything you stated. But it is not correct to speak these things:( People don't wish to see emperor's nakedness.

    SS

  • plmkrzy
    plmkrzy

    Actually avenger, get your facts strait to. THOSE TOWERS are called "The Twin Towers"

    Syn, I would like to know if you can recall the moment you first thought "conspiracy" after the planes all hit?

    The reason being, That's exactly what my puny brain thought almost immediately. And for all who think I'm so full of shit I bet my IQ is higher then yours. Not that it would make a difference but people who think they have so much acquired knowledge to the point of being a know it all is a very dangerous thing. Just food for thought if you can be open minded enough.

    I was mocked and teased and ridiculed for opening my mouth about the conspiracy theory with regard to the Twin Towers. I think It's funny myself that so many smart people are so stupid.
    plmkrzy

  • 2SYN
    2SYN

    Update 17 March 2002:

    The first tower that got hit was hit square, in the middle by the passenger jet. It was hit quite a few minutes before the other tower, and as far as anyone can tell, virtually all it's jet fuel exploded inside the tower, theoretically burning the giant steel rods that held the tower together and causing it to collapse.

    But for those incredibly big rods (so large they had to be imported - nobody in America could make them that big!) to melt, they would have had to have jet fuel and compressed oxygen supplied to them. HMMMM.

    Remember this: steel doesn't melt easily. When it flows, the heat sort of distributes itself and you land up with a lot of very hot, but still physically strong, metal. Not hot toffee like the people on CNN were saying!.

    The second jet hit the other tower at a funny angle, such that most of it's jet fuel exploded OUTSIDE the other tower (it was a bit of a glancing blow, due to a bad flying mistake on the pilot's side, and one of the engines even flew out the side of the building).

    So why did the second tower to get the glancing blow go down FIRST? The other tower should have gone down first, because it had A) more jet fuel inside it to 'melt the steel rods', and B) was hit first, so there was more time for the 'melting'.

    Anyone care to answer?


    "...the greater will be the beneficial effect, because you get more of the ultra-violet rays, which are healing" - The Golden Age
    [SYN], UADA
    - Unseen Apostate Directorate of Africa.

  • You Know
    You Know

    Whatever dude. / You Know

  • willy_think
    willy_think
    Remember this: steel doesn't melt easily. When it flows, the heat sort of distributes itself and you land up with a lot of very hot, but still physically strong, metal. Not hot toffee like the people on CNN were saying!.


    As a commercial carpenter I help build high rises in Boston, and I can tell you for sure that, this is not a true statement steel I-beems will lose there structural integrity with heat just like that. in fact the rapid lose of structural integrity is the only reason we can't use it in residential construction. Wood framed houses will last much longer in a serious fire then a steal frame.

    The Great and Powerful Oz:

    pay no attention to the man behind the curtain
  • 2SYN
    2SYN

    That's pretty hard to believe, Willy_think. Do you have evidence to back it up? Steel doesn't MELT the way it would have had to for those incredibly strong buildings to collapse. They just imploded far too neatly.

    And YouKnow, as usual you've simply dodged my question entirely. Nice one!


    "...the greater will be the beneficial effect, because you get more of the ultra-violet rays, which are healing" - The Golden Age
    [SYN], UADA
    - Unseen Apostate Directorate of Africa.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit