Bodies Won't be Buried at Armageddon. Is This Why?

by cameo-d 2 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  cameo-d

  TOKYO, March 31 (AP) - (Kyodo)—Radiation fears have prevented authorities from collecting as many as 1,000 bodies of victims of the March 11 earthquake and tsunami from within the 20-kilometer-radius evacuation zone around the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant, police sources said Thursday.

  One of the sources said bodies had been "exposed to high levels of radiation after death."

  http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9MA0OT80&show_article=1

  But then, it could be the same scenerio with a deadly plague.

  Or...it could be that there are no bodies if they are covered in ash from volcanic explosion or swept away in floods.

  Is this how it starts?
• 

  Black Sheep

  Armageddon's dead and buried. I don't know why you're bothering to try and dig it up again.

  Forget about it and get on with with your life.
• 

  Aussie Oz

  ...it could be that there are no bodies if they are covered in ash from volcanic explosion or swept away in floods.

  read scarevelation again... UNBURIED, ie; exposed, visible.

  the writer of revelation wanted to scare everybody with the mental image of unburied, rotting bird food corpses that nobody would mourn. To scare people into submission on the threat of being nothing to anybody, forgotten, unremembered for eternity.

  and it worked.

  oz