"Why Isn't Wall Street In Jail" Great Rolling Stone Article

by Justitia Themis 4 Replies latest jw friends

  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    Favorite quote: "

    To understand the significance of this, one has to think carefully about the efficacy of fines as a punishment for a defendant pool that includes the richest people on earth — people who simply get their companies to pay their fines for them. Conversely, one has to consider the powerful deterrent to further wrongdoing that the state is missing by not introducing this particular class of people to the experience of incarceration. "You put Lloyd Blankfein in pound-me-in-the-ass prison for one six-month term, and all this bullshit would stop, all over Wall Street," says a former congressional aide. "That's all it would take. Just once."

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216

    This is just page one.

    By Matt Taibbi

    February 16, 2011 9:00 AM ET

    O ver drinks at a bar on a dreary, snowy night in Washington this past month, a former Senate investigator laughed as he polished off his beer.

    "Everything's fucked up, and nobody goes to jail," he said. "That's your whole story right there. Hell, you don't even have to write the rest of it. Just write that."

    I put down my notebook. "Just that?"

    "That's right," he said, signaling to the waitress for the check. "Everything's fucked up, and nobody goes to jail. You can end the piece right there."

    Nobody goes to jail. This is the mantra of the financial-crisis era, one that saw virtually every major bank and financial company on Wall Street embroiled in obscene criminal scandals that impoverished millions and collectively destroyed hundreds of billions, in fact, trillions of dollars of the world's wealth — and nobody went to jail. Nobody, that is, except Bernie Madoff, a flamboyant and pathological celebrity con artist, whose victims happened to be other rich and famous people.

    This article appears in the March 3, 2011 issue of Rolling Stone. The issue is available now on newsstands and will appear in the online archive February 18.

    The rest of them, all of them, got off. Not a single executive who ran the companies that cooked up and cashed in on the phony financial boom — an industrywide scam that involved the mass sale of mismarked, fraudulent mortgage-backed securities — has ever been convicted. Their names by now are familiar to even the most casual Middle American news consumer: companies like AIG, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley. Most of these firms were directly involved in elaborate fraud and theft. Lehman Brothers hid billions in loans from its investors. Bank of America lied about billions in bonuses. Goldman Sachs failed to tell clients how it put together the born-to-lose toxic mortgage deals it was selling. What's more, many of these companies had corporate chieftains whose actions cost investors billions — from AIG derivatives chief Joe Cassano, who assured investors they would not lose even "one dollar" just months before his unit imploded, to the $263 million in compensation that former Lehman chief Dick "The Gorilla" Fuld conveniently failed to disclose. Yet not one of them has faced time behind bars.

    Invasion of the Home Snatchers

    Instead, federal regulators and prosecutors have let the banks and finance companies that tried to burn the world economy to the ground get off with carefully orchestrated settlements — whitewash jobs that involve the firms paying pathetically small fines without even being required to admit wrongdoing. To add insult to injury, the people who actually committed the crimes almost never pay the fines themselves; banks caught defrauding their shareholders often use shareholder money to foot the tab of justice. "If the allegations in these settlements are true," says Jed Rakoff, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York, "it's management buying its way off cheap, from the pockets of their victims."

    Taibblog: Commentary on politics and the economy by Matt Taibbi

    To understand the significance of this, one has to think carefully about the efficacy of fines as a punishment for a defendant pool that includes the richest people on earth — people who simply get their companies to pay their fines for them. Conversely, one has to consider the powerful deterrent to further wrongdoing that the state is missing by not introducing this particular class of people to the experience of incarceration. "You put Lloyd Blankfein in pound-me-in-the-ass prison for one six-month term, and all this bullshit would stop, all over Wall Street," says a former congressional aide. "That's all it would take. Just once."

    But that hasn't happened. Because the entire system set up to monitor and regulate Wall Street is fucked up.

    Just ask the people who tried to do the right thing.

    Wall Street's Naked Swindle

  • Mary
    Mary

    Thanks for that article Justitia. I've often wondered that myself over the last year or so. WTH hasn't anyone been held accountable for this mess? And instead of giving billions of dollars to the banks and all the big companies, wouldn't it have made more sense to give the money to the average Jo so they could pay off their mortgage and keep their homes?

  • Robdar
    Robdar

    It's a fabulous article. Very interesting.

  • WTWizard
    WTWizard

    Wall Street isn't in jail because the Rothschilds control it. And the same Rothschilds force their way into the governments, via the Fed. Everyone that tries to cut them off ends up assassinated like John F. Kennedy. And, once they are in the government, they make the rules. One of those rules is that they can do whatever the fxxx they feel like, no matter how many innocent people take a bath in the process. Including urging people to invest in muni bonds 6 months before they know hyperinflation is going to render the toilet paper dollar worthless.

    Instead, I would invest in physical silver. There are widespread stories that JP Morgan and HSBC (two of the banks that are supporting the Rothschilds) are short on physical silver, and every silver round you buy means they are going to take that much more of a bath when the balloon comes due for them. And, when they try a bailout, it will create the sort of hyperinflation that will make them take an even bigger bath because the price of silver will go up even worse (they are short more silver than there is in the whole world). In the meantime, the silver will hold its value when the hyperinflation comes--it could be all you have left once the bloodbath is finished.

    Additionally, every ounce of silver you buy (physical silver, not SLV) takes money out of the system. Money in the bank is multiplied through fractional lending, as much as 10 X. Every dollar you have in the bank allows the bank to create $10 by lending it out. If you buy silver, you take that money out of the system (yes, Bernanke will print it up to bail them out). And, even if the banks get bailed out, it will be with toilet paper dollars--diluting the other toilet paper dollars (but not your silver) including the ones the Rothschilds have stolen from us. For sure, it will help those big banks that need to be busted to at least take a bath.

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    There is an interesting post at The Economist, at the link below. I'll quote one sentence from the article that gets at the heart of the matter, IMHO.

    "Legislators worried about the poor often have to cut deals to satisfy the rich people who support their campaigns and other critical institutions."

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/02/political_economy

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit