Where do they say "start & stop 'study' = Bad Association?"

by InterestedOne 7 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • InterestedOne

    I was wondering where (articles or books) the WT teaches that if you start a study & then stop, you become "bad association" and are treated almost like a DF. Is this anywhere in the literature, or is it only an unwritten practice? In the dictionary of JW-ese (http://www.cftf.com/dictionary/index.html#B), it says the practice has been discontinued, and I am wondering what an active JW would say about it if I asked. Here is the definition:

    bad association 1. Any non-Witness, or a JW who is obviously headed for trouble. Example: “It wouldn’t be right to go to a restaurant with our worldly neighbors; they’re bad association.” 2. The act of spending time with a worldly person. 3. obsolete A designation equivalent to disfellowshipped person but applied to an unbaptized individual who had begun to engage in congregation activities. (The practice was discontinued, apparently after encountering defamation lawsuits from such individuals.)

  • Ding

    I don't remember seeing anything on it specifically, but if you stop a WT study you must be a bad person, right?

    I mean, from the WTS point of view, what honorable and sensible reason could anyone have for doing so?

  • sleepingbeauty

    Its just a sort of unwritten practice. They will see it as though you are rejecting Jehovah and that you have become worse than those in the world because you have come to an accurate knowledge of the so called Truth & have therefore have chosen to dissassociate yourself... ! If someones knows the Truth and goes against it then they are worse than a person without Truth. In effect in their words they will liken you to a Dog who Returns to Its Vomit .... :0

    They have such a lovely way with words...

  • laverite

    After learning The Truth, if you reject The Truth, and decide The Truth is not for you, you ARE bad association.

  • sherah

    Anyone not a JW is considered bad association. There's not anything in the literature regarding persons who discontinue their bible study being 'labeled' bad association, it's implied that because you didn't progress to baptism.

    Back in the olden days, persons labeled as 'disapproved associates' was announced from the platform much like disfellowshipped persons are today. That practice was discontinued in the late 80's.

  • laverite

    They may not announce it any longer but everyone soon knows if you are considered bad association.

  • AnnOMaly

    Funny you should ask this, Interested One. Someone else on another board was only just discussing the same thing! But the issue about treating a progressive Bible student as DFed was to do with if s/he 'engages in wrongdoing' - not to do with merely stopping the study.


    What of nonbaptized individuals who have been recognized as approved associates, have shared in the field service with the congregation or even have enrolled in the Theocratic Ministry School, but who have now become involved in serious wrongdoing? They should be dealt with in a way similar to that of baptized Witnesses with the exception that, not being recognized members of the congregation, they could not be formally expelled therefrom. It may be that they do not fully understand the Bible's standards, and kind counsel may help them to make straight paths for their feet.

    If a nonbaptized wrongdoer is still unrepentant after a judicial committee has met with him and tried to help him, then it becomes necessary to inform the congregation. A brief announcement is made that the person is no longer recognized as an approved associate. (1 Cor. 15:33) The congregation will then view the wrongdoer as they would view one who has been disfellowshipped. No field service reports would be accepted from such a person.

    - Organized To Accomplish Our Ministry (1983), p. 148-9.

    The reversal of the 'treat them as disfellowshipped' policy:

    w88 11/15 pp. 18-19 pars. 16-18 Helping Others to Worship God

    Help for One Who Errs

    ... 16 Occasionally, an unbaptized publisher who is a wrongdoer will not respond to loving assistance. Or an unbaptized publisher may determine that he does not want to continue progressing toward baptism, and he informs the elders that he does not want to be recognized as a publisher. What is to be done? Disfellowshipping action is not taken regarding such ones who actually have not become approved by God. The arrangement of disfellowshipping unrepentant wrongdoers applies to those 'called brothers,' to baptized ones. (1 Corinthians 5:11) Does this mean, though, that the wrongdoing is ignored? No.

    17 The elders are responsible to 'shepherd the flock of God in their care.' (1 Peter 5:2) If two elders offering help determine that an unbaptized wrongdoer is unrepentant and unqualified to be a publisher, they will inform the individual. [Footnote: If the individual is dissatisfied with this conclusion, he may request (within seven days) to have the matter reviewed.] Or if some unbaptized one tells the elders that he no longer wishes to be recognized as a publisher, they will accept his decision. In either case, it is appropriate for the Congregation Service Committee to have a simple announcement made at an appropriate time, saying " . . . is no longer a publisher of the good news."

    18 How will Witnesses thereafter view the person? Well, at an earlier point he was an 'unbeliever' attending meetings. Then he both wanted to be and qualified to be a publisher of the good news. This is no longer the case, so he again is a person of the world. The Bible does not require that Witnesses avoid speaking with him, for he is not disfellowshipped. [Footnote: Previously, unbaptized ones who unrepentantly sinned were completely avoided. While, as adjusted above, this is not required, the counsel at 1 Corinthians 15:33 should still be observed.] Still, Christians will exercise caution with regard to such a person of the world who is not worshiping Jehovah, even as Israelites did regarding uncircumcised alien settlers. This caution helps to protect the congregation from any "little leaven," or corrupting element. (1 Corinthians 5:6)

  • sherah

    Great references Ann O'Maly! I forgot about the OM book.

Share this