Interesting language in the "JW and Child Protection" article

by lepermessiah 5 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • lepermessiah
    Please read the second-to-last paragraph.
    Ok, are you a man-made human organization, or JEHOVAH'S organization? Nice to be able to make both claims when convienient! When it comes to running rough-shod over people on every other matter, its JEHOVAHS organization. When it comes to shirking responsibility, its a HUMAN organization. Give me a break!

    Jehovah’s Witnesses and Child Protection

    Also in Spanish

    Child abuse is abhorrent to us. This is in harmony with the Bible principle recorded at Romans 12:9. Even one abused child is one too many. For decades The Watchtower and Awake! have featured articles to educate both Witnesses and the public regarding the importance and the need to protect children from child abuse. Among others, there were the articles “Let Us Abhor What Is Wicked!” published in the January 1, 1997, issue of The Watchtower; “Help for the Victims of Incest,” in the October 1, 1983, Watchtower; “Your Child Is in Danger!” “How Can We Protect Our Children?” and “Prevention in the Home”, all in the October 8, 1993, Awake!, as well as “Child Molesting—Every Mother’s Nightmare,” in the January 22, 1985, Awake!

    When any one of Jehovah’s Witnesses is accused of an act of child abuse, the local congregation elders are expected to investigate. Two elders meet separately with the accused and the accuser to see what each says on the matter. If the accused denies the charge, the two elders may arrange for him and the victim to restate their position in each other’s presence, with elders also there. If during that meeting the accused still denies the charges and there are no others who can substantiate them, the elders cannot take action within the congregation at that time. Why not? As a Bible-based organization, we must adhere to what the Scriptures say, namely, “No single witness should rise up against a man respecting any error or any sin . . . At the mouth of two witnesses or at the mouth of three witnesses the matter should stand good.” (Deuteronomy 19:15) Jesus reaffirmed this principle as recorded at Matthew 18:15-17. However, if two persons are witnesses to separate incidents of the same kind of wrongdoing, their testimony may be deemed sufficient to take action.

    However, even if the elders cannot take congregational action, they are expected to report the allegation to the branch office of Jehovah's Witnesses in their country, if local privacy laws permit. In addition to making a report to the branch office, the elders may be required by law to report even uncorroborated or unsubstantiated allegations to the authorities. If so, the elders receive proper legal direction to ensure that they comply with the law. Additionally, the victim or anyone else who has knowledge of the allegation may wish to report the matter to the authorities, and it is his or her absolute right to do so.

    If, when confronted, the accused confesses that he is guilty of child abuse, the elders take appropriate congregational action. If he is not repentant, he will not be permitted to remain a member of the congregation. Even if he is repentant—is cut to the heart and is thus resolutely determined to avoid such conduct in the future—what was stated in the January 1, 1997, issue of The Watchtower applies. The article said: “For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer [full-time missionary of Jehovah’s Witnesses] or serve in any other special, full-time service.” He would not qualify Scripturally. (1 Timothy 3:2, 7-10) We take such action because we are concerned with maintaining Bible standards and protecting our children. Everyone in our organization is expected to meet the same requirements, namely, to be clean physically, mentally, morally, and spiritually.—2 Corinthians 7:1; Ephesians 4:17-19; 1 Thessalonians 2:4.

    In a few instances, individuals guilty of an act of child abuse have been appointed to positions within the congregation if their conduct has been otherwise exemplary for decades. All the factors are considered carefully. Suppose, for example, that a long time ago an 18-year-old male had sexual relations with a 15-year-old girl who was a willing participant. Depending upon the U.S. jurisdiction where he lived when this happened, elders may have been required to report this as an incident of child abuse. Let us say that 20 years have passed. He has been living an exemplary life and he is respected. In such a case, the man could possibly be appointed to a responsible position within the congregation.

    Our procedures have been refined over time. Over the years, as we have noted areas where our policies could be strengthened, we have followed through. We are continuing to refine them. We do not believe that our system is perfect. No human organization is perfect. But we do believe that we have a strong, Bible-based policy on child abuse. Anyone in a responsible position who is guilty of child abuse would be removed from his responsibilities without hesitation. We certainly would not knowingly allow him to serve elsewhere, either because he moved or through a transfer. Further, we regularly review our procedures to ensure that they are in compliance with the law.—Romans 13:1.

    The Bible teaches that individuals can repent of their sins and “turn to God by doing works that befit repentance,” and we accept what the Bible says. (Acts 26:20) Still, the safety of our children is of the utmost importance. We take it very seriously.

  • fokyc

    This has been on the jw-media site since 2003, last November it was made easier to find and print.

    Our local elders were shown this item, at first sight they said:

    "Brother fokyc spends a great deal of time on his computer and he has made this up"!

    Several months later they said: "It is wrong and out of date."

    When actually faced with an accusation of child abuse; they telephoned the police immediately.

  • Billy the Ex-Bethelite
    Billy the Ex-Bethelite

    "No human organization is perfect."

    That should be the title of this week's Botchtower Study farticle about the overlapping generations.

  • Heaven

    We do not believe that our system is perfect.

    Really? So then, that must mean, God isn't perfect. Whoda known!

    When you look up the word 'imperfect' in the dictionary, you'll see this:

    Watchtower Logo

  • NiceDream

    "If the accused denies the charge, the two elders may arrange for him and the victim to restate their position in each other’s presence, with elders also there."

    I was not aware of this crap. Who would want to be in the same room as their molester? And if that vile person still denies the charges, nothing will be done about it? How unloving!

    And it's wonderful to see they are just a "human organization." I wish I had known that 15 years ago so I wouldn't have wasted my time serving a bunch of men.

  • jamiebowers

    Recent court cases have proven that the above article is full of lies. Take for example the Gilbert Simental case in CA. Even after the elders were notified, a teacher of one of the victims reported the molestation to the police, not the girl's mom and most certainly not the elders. California IS a mandatory reporting state, by the way. Once this pervert was in the process of being prosecuted, the elders had to be compelled to testify against him. As a matter of fact, the elders made a deal to avoid prosecution themselves.

    The Watchtower has printed and propagated lies since its inception, so why should it be any diferent now. Google Gilbert Simental if you don't believe me.

Share this