Christian Beliefs Have No Legal Standing

by sammielee24 5 Replies latest jw friends

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    British Judge: Christian Beliefs Have No Legal Standing

    First Posted: 04-30-10 09:10 PM | Updated: 04-30-10 11:20 PM

    LONDON (RNS) A top British judge has ruled that Christian beliefs have no standing under secular law because they lack evidence and cannot be proven.</form>

    Lord Justice John Grant McKenzie Laws made the declaration on Thursday (April 29) in throwing out a defamation suit by Christian relationship counselor who refused to offer sex therapy to gay couples.

    Gary McFarlane protested that he was fired because offering sex therapy to same-gender couples violates his Christian principles.

    But Laws said "religious faith is necessarily subjective, being incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence." He added that to use the law to protect "a position held purely on religious grounds cannot therefore be justified."

    No religious belief, said the judge, can be protected under the law "however long its tradition, however rich its culture."

    Laws also dismissed as "misplaced" and "mistaken" former archbishop of Canterbury George Carey's warning that a wave of discrimination against Christians threatens "civil war" in Britain.

    Carey described the High Court ruling as "deeply worrying," heralding "a 'secular state' rather than a 'neutral' one."

    Former Anglican bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali wrote in The Daily Telegraph newspaper in London that Laws' ruling had "driven a coach and horses" through the ages-old ties between Christianity and British law.

    But Terry Sanderson, president of the National Secular Society in Britain, applauded the judgment as a defeat for "fundamentalism," adding that "the law must be clear, that anti-discrimination laws exist to protect people, not beliefs.

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    Well, this should put an end to a lot of conscientious objector clauses.

    BTS

  • Gregor
    Gregor

    Oh, but apparently they do! We see Christian cult parents who refuse medical treatment for their ill children all the time. We hear about these cases after the poor kid has died from a treatable/preventable condition. I have seen many who were either found not guilty or, at best, given a token punishment.

    This not just JW's and blood. There are many sects who only believe in prayer, even for a child with diabetes that could easily have survived with treatment.

  • 5thGeneration
    5thGeneration

    But shouldn't everyone's rights be protected (if they don't harm others) regardless of whether they're provable?

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips
    But shouldn't everyone's rights be protected (if they don't harm others) regardless of whether they're provable?

    Not in Ye Merrye Olde Englande.

    Apparently you have to prove what you believe.

    Of course, if you can prove it, what's the point in believing it?

    What a conundrum.

    Of course, if it had been a Muslim objector, this decision would never had stood. The objector would have been given a vacation in Libya for a little R&R. Qadafi's best for him!

    And you have to factor in how Muslims can get a little crazy, and cut heads off and shit. And car bombs.

    Besides, it isn't politically correct! Don't even think it! It's thoughtcrime, bigot!

    The Brits are becoming so uber-secular they'll all be bow-wowing to Mecca in 50 years. They don't realize that if they destroy Christian civ the vacuum is going to be filled by Mohammed's prick.

    BTS

  • Gregor
    Gregor

    the vacuum is going to be filled by Mohammed's prick.

    That's when he throws his head back and shouts "Eureka!"...or..."Sucks like an Electrolux!"....

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit