Boy Scouts "Perversion" Files to be Released?

by blondie 5 Replies latest jw friends

  • blondie
    blondie

    Boy Scouts accused of sex abuse cover-up

    ‘Perversion files’ kept secret by Scouts due to ‘confidential information’ The Associated Press updated 4:12 a.m. CT, Fri., March. 19, 2010

    PORTLAND, Ore. - The Boy Scouts of America has long kept an extensive archive of secret documents that chronicle the sexual abuse of young boys by Scout leaders over the years.

    The "perversion files," a nickname the Boy Scouts are said to have used for the documents, have rarely been seen by the public, but that could all change in the coming weeks in an Oregon courtroom.

    The lawyer for a man who was molested in the 1980s by a Scout leader has obtained about 1,000 Boy Scouts sex files and is expected to release some of them at a trial that began Wednesday.

    The lawyer says the files show how the Boy Scouts have covered up abuse for decades.

    The trial is significant because the files could offer a rare window into how the Boy Scouts have responded to sex abuse by Scout leaders.

    The only other time the documents are believed to have been presented at a trial was in the 1980s in Virginia.

    At the start of the Oregon trial, attorney Kelly Clark recited the Boy Scout oath and the promise to obey Scout law to be "trustworthy." Then he presented six boxes of documents that he said will show "how the Boy Scouts of America broke that oath."

    He held up file folder after file folder he said contained reports of abuse from around the country, telling the jury the efforts to keep them secret may have actually set back efforts to prevent child abuse nationally.

    "The Boy Scouts of America ignored clear warning signs that Boy Scouts were being abused," Clark said.

    'Trying to do the right thing'
    Charles Smith, attorney for the national Boy Scouts, said in his own opening statement the files were kept under wraps because they "were replete with confidential information."

    Smith told the jury the files helped national scouting leaders weed out sex offenders, especially repeat offenders who may have changed names or moved in order to join another local scouting organization.

    "They were trying to do the right thing by trying to track these folks," Smith said.

    Clark is seeking $14 million in damages on behalf of a 37-year-old man who was sexually molested in the early 1980s in Portland by an assistant Scoutmaster, Timur Dykes.

    Clark said the victim suffered mental health problems, bad grades in school, drug use, anxiety, difficulty maintaining relationships and lost several jobs over the years because of the abuse.

    Dykes was convicted three times between 1983 and 1994 of sexually abusing boys, most of them Scouts.

    Although there have been dozens of lawsuits against the organization over sex abuse allegations, judges for the most part have either denied requests for the files or the lawsuits have been settled before they went to trial.

    The Boy Scouts had fought to keep the files being used in the Portland trial confidential. But they lost a pretrial legal battle when the Oregon Supreme Court rejected their argument that opening the files could damage the lives and reputations of people not a party to the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit also named the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints because the Mormons acted as a charter organization, or sponsor, for the local Boy Scouts troop that included the victim. But the church has settled its portion of the case.

    The Portland trial comes as the Boy Scouts are marking their 100th anniversary.

    "They spent a century building the Boy Scout brand," said Patrick Boyle, author of a book about sex abuse in the Boy Scouts. "It's one of the most respected organizations in the world."

    The trial "can only erode what they have been doing for 100 years," he said.

    The Portland case centers on whether the Boy Scouts of America did enough to protect boys from Dykes.

    The Mormon bishop who also served as head of the Scout troop, Gordon McEwen, confronted Dykes after receiving a report of abuse by the mother of one boy in the troop in January 1983.

    In a video deposition played for the jury, the bishop said Dykes admitted abusing 17 boys.

    ProbationBut McEwen said he contacted the parents of all 17 boys and the boys themselves, and none would confirm any abuse.

    Dykes was arrested in 1983 and pleaded guilty to attempted sexual abuse, received probation and was ordered to stay away from children.

    Clark told the jury Dykes continued with his scouting activities until he was arrested in July 1984 during a routine traffic stop while he was driving a van full of Scouts on a camping trip.

    A spokesman for the Boy Scouts of America at its headquarters in Irving, Texas, said in a statement the organization cannot comment on details of the case. But it has worked hard on awareness and prevention efforts, including background checks.

    "Unfortunately, child abuse is a societal problem and there is no fail-safe method for screening out abusers," Deron Smith said.

    Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35944804/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

  • nugget
    nugget

    It is tragic that organisations care more about reputation the n there membership. Just like JWs they try to weasel out og their moral obligations in this matter.

    What would be refreshing is that all groups have a zero tolerance policy, all offenders being named and shamed and receiving the full penalty of the law.

  • sir82
    sir82

    Yeesh!

    Is there any large, or even medium-sized, organization that doesn't have some sort of sex abuse cover-up scandal?

  • shamus100
    shamus100

    Abuse is subjugative.

    Years ago, what constituded abuse was not really abuse. Nowadays, because humans are complete idiots, we require laws on just about everything, including, but not limited to, sexual abuse of boys and girls and what is appropriate and inappropriate. Leave common-sense aside.

    It's like this - in my country, the age of conscent is still sixteen. That means that a fifty year old man can still go out and have sex with a sixteen year old girl. Now that is abuse, but leave common-sense at the door! My laws tell me it ain't illegal, so I's gonna do it! Why laws need to be written in stone and why people cannot use common-sense anymore is quite perplexing to me, and will probably be so until the day I leave this here earth that the good lord jehover gave to us.

  • Yizuman
    Yizuman
    It's like this - in my country, the age of conscent is still sixteen. That means that a fifty year old man can still go out and have sex with a sixteen year old girl. Now that is abuse, but leave common-sense at the door! My laws tell me it ain't

    Here's the beauty of Federal Law. Congress passed a law a few years ago making oversea trips to sexually abuse children illegal. Now only KNOWN RSOs that is flagged when they're making oversea trips. The Feds will monitor them and if they're found to be sexually abusing children, even if it is legal of age in that country, it's still illegal here in the US.

    Once they make the trip back and if the Feds have evidence of sexual abuse of children while overseas, they will be arrested once they arrive at the gate.

    Yiz

  • blondie
    blondie

    Based on that reasoning re 16-year-olds, if they are mature enough to choose their sexual partners, then they must be mature enough to choose their religious affiliation..............

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit