JW blatantly lies in news article - UK

by Gayle 7 Replies latest social current

  • Gayle
    Gayle

    http://www.cumberland-news.co.uk/business/derek_ends_35_year_career_in_printing_to_become_a_minister_1_652214?referrerPath=business/

    Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t have a creed, we have no special beliefs, we just believe purely in The Bible.

    (This was sent to me by Danny Haszard)

  • Gayle
    Gayle

    sorry, don't know why that URL split like that - hope you can cut & paste one that.

  • SallySue
    SallySue

    "No special belief"?????? Is this guy fooling himself or others?????

  • fleaman uk
    fleaman uk

    Wheres the "blatant lie"? What am i missing?

  • SallySue
    SallySue

    "they believe purely in the Bible"

  • wobble
    wobble

    Plus :
    "No special beliefs" . Lie. No. 2

    Mind you those beliefs are not so much special as downright looney, but don't good Dubbies like to hide all that from the public ? Cult ?

    Love

    Wobble

  • blondie
    blondie

    The Church of Christ has no creed.

    Does the church of Christ have a creed?

    No. At least, there is no creed in the usual sense of the word. The belief of the church is stated fully and completely in the Bible. There is no other manual or discipline to which the members of the church of Christ give their allegiance. The Bible is considered as the only infallible guide to heaven.

    http://church-of-christ.org/who.html#creed

    Christians without creeds

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creed

    Main article: Free Christian

    Some Christian denominations, and particularly those descending from the Radical Reformation, do not profess a creed. The Quakers, formally known as the Religious Society of Friends, find no need for creedal formulations of faith. The Church of the Brethren also espouses no creed, referring to the New Testament, as their "rule of faith and practice." [ 9 ] Unitarians, who practice probably the most liberal of all religions, do not share a creed. [ 10 ]

    Many evangelical Protestants similarly reject creeds as definitive statements faith, even while agreeing with some creeds' substance. The Baptists have been non-creedal “in that they have not sought to establish binding authoritative confessions of faith on one another”. [ 11 ] :p.111 While many Baptists are not opposed to the ancient creeds, they regard them as “not so final that they cannot be revised and re-expressed. At best, creeds have a penultimacy about them and, of themselves, could never be the basis of Christian fellowship”. [ 11 ] :p.112 Moreover, Baptist ‘confessions of faith’ have often had a clause such as this from the First London (Particular) Baptist Confession (Revised edition, 1646):

    Also we confess that we now know but in part and that are ignorant of many things which we desire to and seek to know: and if any shall do us that friendly part to show us from the Word of God that we see not, we shall have cause to be thankful to God and to them.

    Similar reservations about the use of creeds can be found in the Restoration Movement and its descendants, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), the Churches of Christ, and the Independent Christian Churches/Churches of Christ.

    Some religious leaders in traditional creedal Churches have also come to question the utility of creeds. Bishop John Shelby Spong, retired Episcopal Bishop of Newark, has written that dogmas and creeds were merely "a stage in our development" and "part of our religious childhood." In his book, Sins of the Scripture, Spong claims that "Jesus seemed to understand that no one can finally fit the holy God into his or her creeds or doctrines. That is idolatry." [ 12 ]

    Many people said (the Apostles Creed), but they understood what it was saying and what they meant by that quite differently. No matter how hard they tried, they could not close out this perennial debate. They cannot establish a consensus and they could not agree on the meaning of that phrase which had been once "delivered to the saints." It did not occur to these people that the task they were trying to accomplish was not a human possibility, that the mystery of God, including the God they believed they had met in Jesus, could not be reduced to human words and human concepts or captured inside human creeds. Nor did they understand that the tighter and more specific their words became, the less they would achieve the task of unifying the church. All creeds have ever done is to define those who are outside, who were not true believers; and thus their primarily achievement has been to set up eternal conflict between the "ins" and the "outs," a conflict that has repeatedly degenerated into the darkest sort of Christian behavior, including imperialism, torture, persecution, death and war.

    – Bishop John Shelby Spong [ 13 ]

  • ziddina
    ziddina

    Ooooh, yeah, that was delusional... Hidden towards the end of the article like that, one could just pass over it without noticing or thinking about it... Wonder if he lies to himself, too - helps prevent that 'cognitive dissonance' that so many have mentioned here...

    "We just believe purely in the Bible...." But you can't read it by itself, nor ask questions about things you find in the bible that puzzle you, or you'll be disfellowshipped for apostasy...

    Yuk. Whatta buncha liars... Zid
    jk

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit