CNN account of star of bethlehem

by orbison 1 Replies latest jw friends

  • orbison
    orbison

    (CNN) -- A U.S. astronomer said he has uncovered the first reference to the star of Bethlehem outside the Bible, in the 4th-century writings of a Christian convert who wanted to hide the astrological roots of the celestial phenomenon.

    For centuries, scientists and scholars have debated about the nature of the Biblical light that led the Magi to the newborn Jesus. Some have suggested a comet or supernova.

    But Michael Molnar concluded that the star was actually a double eclipse of Jupiter roughly 2,000 years ago.

    The former Rutgers University researcher came up with the idea while studying a symbolic star map on an ancient Roman empire coin from Syria, which depicts Aries the ram and other celestial symbols.

    Molnar, deducing that Aries was the sign of the Jews, figured that ancient astrologers would have searched that constellation for a sign of a savior of the kingdom of Judea.

    Computer modeling backed up his claim. But Molnar lacked historical proof until now, he said.

    The Mathesis, a book written in 334 A.D. by Firmicus Maternus, an astrologer of Constantine the Great, described an astrological event involving an eclipse of Jupiter by the moon in Aries, and said that it signified the birth of a divine king.

    "Maternus did not mention Jesus' name," Molnar said. "But Roman astrology was a popular craze at the time and everyone reading the book would have known the reference was to Jesus and that the astrological event was the star of Bethlehem."

    He failed to bring up the name because he did not wish to offend the sensibilities of members of his new religion, who thought that the Christian God, not the stars, governed the destiny of humankind.

    But old beliefs still held great sway in the Roman Empire.

    "Being a pagan who had converted to Christianity in his lifetime, Firmicus was torn. Hence his use of astrology to support the Christian story, but in a veiled way," Molnar said.

    The unconventional astronomer has gained the respect of notable Biblical historians.

    "I take Molnar's work quite seriously," said Owen Gingerich of Harvard University. "Anything he comes up with along these lines has to be considered as being very likely correct."

    Gushed Bradley Schaefer of Yale University, in a review Molnar's book, 'The Star of Bethlehem': "(It) has stunning new insight and approach, which finally gives a confident answer to a question that has fascinated all Christians through the ages."

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    But Michael Molnar concluded that the star was actually a double eclipse of Jupiter roughly 2,000 years ago.

    It’s become quite obvious that people who post this type of drivel are not listening to what people have said a number of times on this and other forums in regard to the ridiculous assumption that the “star” had something to do with the planets etc. THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY THAT SUCH A THEORY COULD BE TRUE. The Biblical account says that the star came to a stop ABOVE where the young child was … and when they went into the HOUSE they saw the young child with Mary its mother. No conjunction of planets, no “double eclipse of Jupiter”, nor anything else having to do with the bodies which make up the solar system could conceivably come to a stop above the house in which Jesus lived so as to point out the exact house where he could be found. WHEN WILL THOSE WHO INSIST ON CONTINUING TO POST SUCH NONSENSE GET THAT THROUGH THEIR THICK SCULLS? OBVIOUSLY, THEY DON’T HAVE EARS TO HEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    This so-called Star of Bethlehem was nothing more than a mysterious light that Satan himself produced in his attempt to kill the one that was destined to crush his head. The "star", or light, was merely a tool that Satan used in hopes of thwarting God's advancing purpose to restore heaven and earth to the original state they BOTH were in before Satan disturbed it all, hence the "new heaven" and "new earth" of which Revelation 21:1 speaks.

    Molnar, deducing that Aries was the sign of the Jews, figured that ancient astrologers would have searched that constellation for a sign of a savior of the kingdom of Judea.
    The “ancient astrologers” (aka “Magi”) weren’t trying to find “a savior”. They went into Jerusalem asking: “Where is the one born king of the Jews.”

    Daniel 11:35 ... a KEY prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit