Law shields religious charities from scrutiny

by betterdaze 5 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • betterdaze
    betterdaze

    Just posting for future reference...

    Law shields religious charities from scrutiny

    Sunday, July 26, 2009
    BY HARVY LIPMAN
    The Record
    STAFF WRITER

    One of the key elements of the money-laundering case brought Thursday against several leaders of the Syrian Jewish communities in Brooklyn and Deal was the use of charities linked to religious groups as conduits.

    According to the federal complaints, checks made out to the charities were sent to Israel, where the funds were run through other entities and returned to money-laundering clients for a fee.

    This is not the first time federal authorities have uncovered a scam utilizing religious charities to launder money. In fact, less than two weeks ago, Naftali Tzi Weisz, the grand rabbi of a Brooklyn-based Hasidic sect, agreed to plead guilty to one charge in a case involving charities connected to his group. That scheme involved steering donations to the charities, which would transfer the money through various Israeli banks and organizations and return 80 percent to 95 percent of the funds to the donors.

    Thus, a donor who gave $100,000 would get a tax deduction for the full amount, even though only $5,000 to $20,000 of the money went to charity.

    Several experts in non-profit law said that federal tax law significantly hampers regulators’ ability to ferret out abuse by charities linked to religious groups. Under the Internal Revenue Code, such organizations are not required to file tax returns as most non-profits are. Of the half-dozen charities named in Thursday’s federal complaints, only one has filed federal tax returns.

    “There’s no regular flow of information the way there is with every other form of taxpayer, whether an individual or a tax-exempt entity,” said Marc Owens, a Washington lawyer and former head of the Exempt Organizations Division of the Internal Revenue Service.

    “Because of that lack of information, the IRS has a difficult time determining if something irregular is going on. There are no documents to look at.”

    Oversight ‘difficult’

    Daniel Kurtz, a Manhattan lawyer and former director of the New York Attorney General’s Charities Bureau, said religious groups’ exemption from filing tax returns also hamstrings state regulatory agencies, which rely on the information in the returns.
    “Obviously, it makes it tremendously difficult to exercise any level of oversight,” Kurtz said.

    He noted that some restraints on government review of religious groups’ activities are warranted under the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom.

    “There may be some things that would look unusual at another organization, like spending a lot of money for vestments to clothe a priest, that are none of the state’s business,” Kurtz said. “But the total lack of oversight is troubling.”

    Owens said Congress has recently added a section — restricting audits — to the tax code, even further limiting oversight of religious groups.

    “There’s a requirement that a high official of the IRS determine that there is a reasonable probability an audit will find information that endangers the church’s tax-exempt status before an audit can be conducted,” he said.

    That’s quite different from other non-profits, which can be audited if an IRS examiner sees any reason to suspect a problem.

    “You can’t start an audit of a church because an agent drove by a church and saw something suspicious, like a big car parked in the driveway,” Owens said.

    Complicating matters, the tax code doesn’t define what constitutes a church.

    “There are no regulations, but the issue has been addressed by a series of court decisions over the years,” Owens said. The IRS has developed a set of 14 criteria to decide whether an organization constitutes a religious group that have been endorsed to varying degrees in subsequent court rulings.

    Chief among them are whether the organization has a congregation, holds regular services, ordains ministers based on a set of prescribed studies and has its own place or places of worship.

    “An organization does not need to meet all of them, but it needs to meet a goodly number,” Owens said.

    E-mail: [email protected]

  • kwr
    kwr

    Under the terms of services you agreed to when using this forum you stated that:

    You would not post any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, copyright, database right, trade secret or other proprietary right of any party (the "Rights"), unless you are the owner of the Rights or have the permission of the owner to Post such Content;

  • Lucky Calamity
    Lucky Calamity

    Makes me want to start a church.

  • ssn587
    ssn587

    I have absolutely no problem with having churches or religions with substance (that is a population of 200,000 or more) taxed. They use public conveniences, like water, electricity, roads, police (when needed), etc. etc. So why aren't they being taxed. Property tax too, that would raise a lot of $$$ and if we are going to tax the so called rich then by all means lets tax the religions and their charities (you should have proma facia evidence) that you do actually have charitable benefits for all not just a majority of your own people.

    The charity of saying fixing houses that have been damaged, then getting the $$$ from the insurance when it arrives, it goes to a supposed pool (the society coffers) to be used for further fixing up remodeling etal. This is making a profit, you can't say its charity and then strong arm the beneficiary of the supposed charity for any monies they may receive from their insurance companies. The only real charity being done there is from the workers who (supposedly) work for free.

  • betterdaze
    betterdaze

    Again, just posting for future reference. Religious organizations laundering money through charitable donation kickbacks... "schools" and real estate Ponzi schemes... who knew?

    Trouble for Dwek donors as IRS follows the money

    By Ted Sherman/The Star-Ledger
    December 05, 2009, 7:30PM

    It was only a matter of time before the IRS began looking at the master informant behind a massive money laundering and corruption sting that led to the arrests of dozens of elected officials, rabbis and political operatives in July.

    The tax inquiry, however, could also be a ticking bomb for anyone else who gave money and expected kickbacks from the religious institutions and schools at the focus of the ongoing criminal probe.

    Solomon Dwek, 37, agreed to serve as an informant after authorities accused him of a $50 million bank fraud. He pleaded guilty in October to federal and state criminal charges. According to court filings, the Internal Revenue Service, in a civil proceeding, is now looking closely at the financial details behind Dwek’s fraudulent transactions — and also at the millions of dollars in contributions Dwek made to the Deal Yeshiva, a school where he once served as vice president.

    The tax probe could have much further repercussions if others contributed money to the charities involved in the case and subsequently received kickbacks, as Dwek did as part of the sting.

    There is precedent for thinking that, as intense as the focus has been on the politics side of the scandal, the effect on the religion side could become just as far-reaching.

    In Los Angeles, more than 100 contributors to a Hasidic Jewish sect in Brooklyn are being investigated by the U.S Attorney for the Central District of California in connection with the same kind of kickbacks spelled out in the New Jersey cases.

    While no one has yet been targeted in New Jersey, records from several institutions tied to the case have already been seized by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for New Jersey. Officials would not say if the investigation is being expanded to look at contributors.
    Dwek’s bankruptcy attorney did not return calls for comment, and IRS officials declined to discuss the matter. But in sworn statements, Dwek, a one-time real estate developer, acknowledged his individual tax returns for 2005 and 2006 were being audited in connection with two $25 million checks he wrote out of a closed PNC Bank account in an effort to cover a loan he had obtained fraudulently from HSBC Bank.

    "I believe they came in talking about the PNC check wondering if the income — the money, let’s say the $20 million that went from PNC to pay HSBC — is taxable," stated Dwek.

    Dwek had been involved in a far-reaching real estate Ponzi scheme, obtaining millions in loans and financing for dozens of properties that did not exist. The scheme collapsed after HSBC Bank belatedly conducted a title search and discovered it did not own the mortgages on properties it believed it was financing in Neptune on behalf of Dwek.

    With HSBC demanding the money be repaid, Dwek went to the PNC bank in Eatontown and pulled to the drive-up window with a $25.2 million check drawn on another account that had no money in it, according to a federal complaint. The bank took the check and credited it. Dwek immediately moved out most of the money to repay HSBC, hoping to cover the check with money he anticipated after a property transfer to investors he had cheated. He then tried to cash a second $25 million check.

    He filed for bankruptcy after he was charged.

    LAWSUIT CITES YESHIVA MONEY

    In sworn statements, Dwek said the I

  • betterdaze
    betterdaze

    And again.

    Alleged Ponzi scheme ensnares Kars4Kids

    By Ted Sherman/The Star-Ledger
    December 12, 2009, 9:38PM

    Kars4Kids has a punchy radio jingle that drives some people crazy.

    But the Lakewood-based nonprofit organization — which solicits car donations for disadvantaged children — is now one of dozens of charities embroiled in a federal court fight involving allegations of a massive, international Ponzi scheme.

    At issue are millions in payments to Kars4Kids and more than 60 other registered charities, some of which appear to have quickly kicked the donations back to the donors, often in the space of days, according to court papers.

    The allegations don’t involve money that’s generated when cars are donated to the charity. Instead, the court papers suggest the man at the center of everything, 34-year-old Eliyahu Weinstein, made multimillion-dollar payments to Kars4Kids and other charities as a way to hide assets.

    Weinstein, a member of Lakewood’s ultra-Orthodox Jewish community, and a former used car salesman, is being sued by former partners across two continents who say he duped many of them — most of whom are also members of Orthodox Jewish communities — promising to invest their money in projects that did not exist.

    The court filings say Weinstein diverted the funds as part of a complicated pyramid scheme, and also accuse him of trying to hide the money by funneling it through nonprofit organizations like Kars4Kids, as well as two religious charities now the focus of federal money laundering investigations in New Jersey and California.

    Parking money in a charity would be like putting it in a secret Swiss bank account, keeping it hidden from creditors, angry investors, the government, or civil court judgments. It might then be redirected in any number of ways.

    Attorney Ari Weisbrot of Hackensack, who is representing one of the investors, contends the paper trail of money had all the hallmarks of an elaborate scam.

    "There may be potentially legitimate explanations for those transfers," he said. "But in my opinion, they carry the scent of money laundering."

    Weinstein, through his attorneys, denied any wrongdoing. He has not been charged with any crime and has not been not mentioned in any of the documents connected with either criminal probe.

    In a recent letter to the federal District Court judge in the case, he called the accusations against him "frivolous, scurrilous, baseless allegations of fraud" which he said "seek to tie me to money laundering by innuendo."

    He said he had repaid many of his investors millions of dollars, in one case "arranging for repayment by transferring to plaintiffs ancient scrolls that experts have concluded are over 1,200 years old that he estimated at being worth between $8 million and $12 million. He said he repaid another by transferring rights to the purchase of certain properties in Israel.

    Kars4Kids officials called the allegations "wildly speculative," and said the payments cited by Weisbrot were the result of the sale of real estate.

    In the civil fraud complaints filed against him, Weinstein has been accused by former partners in North America and Europe of taking more than $470 million through complex real estate deals in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, Great Britain and Israel. The deals, they allege, never materialized and the money disappeared. In at least two cases, former partners say he sold property he did not own.

    Weisbrot, who represents Florida investor Harvey Wolinetz, believes the funds were used to repay other victims.

    Bank records obtained in the course of the litigation show that Weinstein sent more than

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit