Revolutionary New Gun Law

by sammielee24 6 Replies latest jw friends

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    Montana Governor Sign
    Stunning New Gun Law KVPI Channel 6 (Montana)

    Associated Press - April 15, 2009 5:24 PM ET
    5-4-9

    MONTANA SOVEREIGNTY BILLS HAVE NATIONAL SCOPE

    HELENA, Mont. (AP) - Gov. Brian Schweitzer has signed into law a bill that aims to exempt Montana-made guns from federal regulation.

    House Bill 246 was sponsored by Republican Rep. Joel Boniek of Livingston. It applies only to guns made and kept in Montana.

    Its supporters hope it triggers a court case to test the legal basis for federal rules governing gun sales.

    The measure is 1 of many introduced this year by state lawmakers across the nation that seek to assert state sovereignty.

    Along with the gun bill, Montana legislators are also considering a resolution that affirms the federal government only has those powers listed in the U.S. Constitution.

    House Resolution 3 follows an effort that failed earlier this session. It was heard Wednesday by the House Judiciary Committee.

    Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    http://www.kpvi.com/Global/story.asp?S=10190400

    MONTANA GOVERNOR SIGNS NEW GUN LAW

    Executive Summary ­- The USA state of Montana has signed into power a revolutionary gun law. I mean REVOLUTIONARY. The State of Montana has defied the federal government and their gun laws. This will prompt a showdown between the federal government and the State of Montana. The federal government fears citizens owning guns. They try to curtail what types of guns they can own. The gun control laws all have one common goal ­ confiscation of privately owned firearms.

    Montana has gone beyond drawing a line in the sand. They have challenged the Federal Government. The fed now either takes them on and risks them saying the federal agents have no right to violate their state gun laws and arrest the federal agents that try to enforce the federal firearms acts. This will be a world-class event to watch. Montana could go to voting for secession from the union, which is really throwing the gauntlet in Obama's face. If the federal government does nothing they lose face. Gotta love it.

    Important Points ­ If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the State of Montana for sale and use inside that state then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines. Montana has the law on their side. Since when did the USA start following their own laws especially the constitution of the USA, the very document that empowers the USA.

    Silencers made in Montana and sold in Montana would be fully legal and not registered. As a note silencers were first used before the 007 movies as a device to enable one to hunt without disturbing neighbors and scaring game. They were also useful as devices to control noise when practicing so as to not disturb the neighbors.

    Silencers work best with a bolt-action rifle. There is a long barrel and the chamber is closed tight so as to direct all the gases though the silencer at the tip of the barrel. Semi-auto pistols and revolvers do not really muffle the sound very well except on the silver screen. The revolvers bleed gas out with the sound all over the place. The semi-auto pistols bleed the gases out when the slide recoils back.

    Silencers are maybe nice for snipers picking off enemy soldiers even though they reduce velocity but not very practical for hit men shooting pistols in crowded places. Silencers were useful tools for gun enthusiasts and hunters.

    There would be no firearm registration, serial numbers, criminal records check, waiting periods or paperwork required. So in a short period of time there would be millions and millions of unregistered untraceable guns in Montana. Way to go Montana!

    Discussion ­ Let us see what Obama does. If he hits Montana hard they will probably vote to secede from the USA. The governor of Texas has already been refusing Federal money because he does not want to agree to the conditions that go with it and he has been saying secession is a right they have as sort of a threat. Things are no longer the same with the USA. Do not be deceived by Obama acting as if all is the same, it is not

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    There's a Democrat Governor I could get behind. I will be watching this closely.

    Important Points ­ If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the State of Montana for sale and use inside that state then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines. Montana has the law on their side. Since when did the USA start following their own laws especially the constitution of the USA, the very document that empowers the USA.

    Of course this is baloney, Wickard Vs Filburn basically extended the Interstate Commerce Clause to mean anything, anytime, anywhere, and at the Federal Government's sole discretion. FDR packed the court with ass kissing New Dealers before that case came before the SCOTUS. I can grow marijuana in my own house, for my own consumption, in a state where it is legal (California) and the Feds will invoke that it is somehow Interstate Commerce to arrest me for doing it.

    BTS

  • BurnTheShips
  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    This is a show down and it will be very interesting to see where it all leads - a very smart move on the part of Montana. sammieswife.

  • Priest73
    Priest73

    reminds me of the war of northern aggression. Then again they re-wrote history about that too.

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    Rumor has it that Utah is going to do this too. I hope Florida lines up too but our Governor is a spineless POS.

    BTS

  • jeeprube
    jeeprube

    The down side to this is that it will just inspire the Federal government to pass new gun legislation.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit