The thing I don't understand is that The Apostle Paul
refers to "older men" (ie elduhs") and describes their required qualifications,
and then he says "likewise OLDER WOMEN must be etc..."
Older women must be addressed like "Mothers".
It seems to me that women with true wisdom and experience can be of great help
in the congregation, especially on things that those with penises have no
experience of. and they can give a truly unique insight a male might never think of.
see no reason in view of this that women should not be appointed to positions of oversight in the congo.
The Dubs use the Scripture "I suffer not a woman to teach. She should be silent."
However conveying the word of God from the Bible is not teaching.
For instance if it said "I suffer not a woman to cook" does this mean a woman is not allowed
to heat up a microwave meal?
All I think Paul meant by this is that Women had not been given a mandate
to actively reinterpret scripture and make major decisions without consulting everybody in the Church.
And we also need to remember that "man" in the Bible is often used as a generic term including females.
Of course can you imagine a JC composed of Pre Menstrual women?
"We are NOT going to DF you - we are going to rip off your
wedding tackle and ram it where the sun don't shine.
"How DARE you question OUR new platform rules on Penis bulges?"
HB