Gordon Brown on America's newly found progressiveness

by hamilcarr 9 Replies latest social current

  • hamilcarr
    hamilcarr

    America has embraced the values of progress

    The election of Obama has inspired millions around the world. It shows how voters need government to provide security in troubled times

    Comments ( 230 )

    This is a defining moment. A new chapter of the human story is being written and will be studied by our children, and their children, and their children after them. It is up to us whether 2008 is remembered for a financial crash that engulfed the world or for a new resilience and optimism from a generation which faced the economic storm head on and built the fair society in its wake.

    The people of America made their choice last week. They picked a progressive President, inspiring the world with their belief that in difficult times people need their government to ensure more - not less - help and security is available for families and business. I'm looking forward to co-operating with the President-elect in building a new global society in which the advancement of people - their homes, jobs, savings and pensions - is always put first.

    Today we are seeing not just the collapse of failed institutions but the collapse of a failed laissez-faire dogma. In this first financial crisis of the global age the old free market fundamentalism, no matter how it is dressed up, has been found wanting. These aren't abstract questions of political theory but woven into the stuff of everyday life. It's a question of how we ensure people get a fair chance and a fair say in life and how we make sure everybody, including banks, abides by rules. It's about what should be done to make sure that people's Christmas savings are safe, about how people can keep the homes they've worked to hard to buy.

    That's the conversation that people all over Britain will be having around their kitchen tables tonight, so let me tell you my take. Our government is pro business; I believe in markets, entrepreneurship and there are many areas of the economy that need the spur of more competition.

    But the events of the past months bear witness, more than anything in my lifetime, to one simple truth: markets need morals. 'Greed is good' is no prescription for the good society, but neither is it the mark of a good economy. It is the progressive values - rewarding hard work, co-operation, responsibility while penalising excess and reckless risk-taking - which will ensure our market economy works efficiently and fairly.

    No country can stop the world slowdown, but it's only progressive governments - in Britain a Labour government - that will take decisive action to safeguard people on middle and modest incomes. While the very privileged can look after themselves in times like these, the rest of us need to know we're not on our own.

    That's why this government has acted to protect homeowners from repossessions, is negotiating £4bn to tide small businesses over and has introduced an energy package, including higher winter fuel allowances for the elderly. It's also because we care about fairness that Labour has taken action to save banks. We haven't done that to help the bankers, but to help people like you who put away your savings in the bank, or need a loan to buy a house or start a business. We've done our bit, so we're determined the banks will do theirs. Banks must now not only cut mortgage rates but start lending again. All banks getting public money need to pass some tough hurdles - such as not rewarding the executives who got them into this mess and not paying cash bonuses this year to people sitting on the boards of banks we are supporting.

    Countries and continents - all of us - are making painful transitions. But beyond this transition will emerge an opportunity-rich global economy for those countries best equipped to prosper. So getting people through the downturn fairly is the most pressing progressive priority. But there is another, deeper way in which progressive values have truly come of age. We have a choice about whether the global interdependence of this new economic era is a force for justice or the driver of even greater social inequality. One billion skilled jobs will be created around the world in the next two decades and that offers boundless opportunities for those who acquire the right skills to climb as far and as fast as their talents will take them.

    When the experts talk about 'social mobility' they mean the universal human instinct - the longing that our children can have a better life than ours and than our parents had before us. That's what this new global economy offers, but only with an energetic progressive government committed to unlocking all of the talent of all of the people.

    Winning the global race to the top will require British firms to move up the value chain - to focus on niche products, high technology services, custom-built goods and specialist green products and services. That means we should not slow down our plans to double investment in science and continue Labour's high levels of investment in quality education. But it also means we must be more ambitious still - building green companies and green jobs as we make the transition to a low-carbon economy; and expanding private and public investment in the new technological infrastructure of the 21st century as the modern equivalent of the new deal investments made in roads and bridges in the 20th century.

    We are in tough times and of course the fairer future is not certain. But the lesson from recent times and now from the Obama victory - whether it be on financial instability, the creation of jobs, or climate change - is that only progressive answers, clear public purpose working for the benefit of all, can meet the big challenges we face.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/09/barack-obama-gordon-brown

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    Politically Gordon Brown and Obama should be a good match -as much as Reagan and Thatcher were

  • kurtbethel
    kurtbethel

    Huh? I did not realize Gordon Brown sat around and smoked crack, until now.

    First off, Obama is not a progressive. Ralph Nader is, and he pulled about .2% of the vote. There may be a lot more progressive Americans than that, but most of them do not vote progressive on election day.

    Most Americans do not usually look to government for security. The ones who do have been fooled, like those who thought they would be looked after when Katrina hit the US a few years ago. Government actually makes Americans less secure by spying on them and finding more excuses to lock them away, while doing it in the name of "homeland security".

    Americans did not vote for someone to build a "global society". The last president tried building a global society and made a global mess of it. A global society is a code word these people use to describe their lust to drive wages to the bottom while looking for global markets to profit from. If this means breaking a nation and then doing a little nation building, that that is fine. The current president has been doing that. Americans are tired of what has become of that policy. They voted for someone who will take care of matters at home, while getting along with the rest of the world and not mucking things up as they have been. The real question is finding out if they will get what they wanted from their vote.

  • hamilcarr
    hamilcarr
    Most Americans do not usually look to government for security. The ones who do have been fooled,

    Just wondering what state the global financial sector would be in without government intervention.

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips
    Just wondering what state the global financial sector would be in without government intervention.

    Likely excellent, since it is government policy that created the crisis to begin with.

    BTS

  • hamilcarr
    hamilcarr
    Likely excellent, since it is government policy that created the crisis to begin with.

    Remains a weird idea after at least two decades of financial deregulation.

  • Brother Apostate
    Brother Apostate
    Just wondering what state the global financial sector would be in without government intervention.

    It would have got it's due, and justly so.

    Capitalism requires that these failures should have been allowed to fail, leaving the healthy to survive. This would have resulted in a severe economic recession where the weak corporations died, and upon hitting the economic trough, the economy would have begun an unprecedented upward climb.

    Socialism requires that these failures be bailed out, merely delaying their inevitable failure. This will result in delaying the inevitable, and exponentially increasing the severity of the worst economic depression the global economy has ever seen. This was without a doubt the worst move in history, and will be life changing for all, even the super-wealthy, this time around.

    BA- By any measure, next year, at least the first half, will be catastophic. After that, we'll see.

  • Brother Apostate
    Brother Apostate
    It shows how voters need government to provide security in troubled times

    From the OP. Lol!!! The last thing "voters", or citizens, for that matter, needed was "government to provide security"!!

    That is rich!

    Watch what happens because of this collossal blunder.

    BA- Dear Lord,please keep me away from whatever substances this guy is on. Amen.

  • 5go
    5go
    Remains a weird idea after at least two decades of financial deregulation.

    Yes, laissez faire economics is thoroughly debunked, and the chicago school of economics is in shambles, if not behind bars.

  • hamilcarr
    hamilcarr
    Capitalism requires that these failures should have been allowed to fail, leaving the healthy to survive. This would have resulted in a severe economic recession where the weak corporations died, and upon hitting the economic trough, the economy would have begun an unprecedented upward climb.

    Which creates a darwininian world, a world of individual struggle and vanishing collective structures.

    Whether or not this leads to an upward move, remains under discussion.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit