Pope Apologizes Again For "Evils" Of Child Abuse

by Justitia Themis 8 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/07/18/pope.australia.sorry/index.html

    CNN) -- Pope Benedict XVI on Saturday offered his strongest public statement yet on sex abuse against minors by Roman Catholic priests, apologizing to victims and calling the abuse "evil."

    Pope Benedict XVI apologized for the "pain" that sexually abusive clergy has caused.

    Pope Benedict XVI apologized for the "pain" that sexually abusive clergy has caused.

    more photos ยป alt

    The apology came during a mass in Sydney, Australia, and expands on comments the pope made during an April visit to the United States, during which he publicly acknowledged the pain the church's sex abuse scandal has caused and met privately with abuse victims.

    "Indeed, I am deeply sorry for the pain and suffering the victims have endured and I assure them as their pastor that I too share in their suffering," he said Saturday at Sydney's St. Mary's Cathedral.

    The comments came on the pope's third day of public appearances in Australia, where he is attending World Youth Day. Dubbed "the Catholic Woodstock," the event is believed to be the largest Christian gathering in the world and this year is believed to have attracted more than 150,000 people from 70 countries.

    Don't Miss

    The pope said he wanted to "acknowledge the shame which we have all felt" over reports of sex abuse by clergy and said those responsible for the "evils" should be brought to justice.

    He asked those attending the mass to help their bishops to end the abuse.

    "It is an urgent priority to create a safer, more wholesome environment, especially for young people," he said.

    In April, the 81-year-old pontiff acknowledged "the enormous pain" caused by sexual abuse of children by the clergy.

    "It is vitally important that the vulnerable are always shielded from souls who would cause harm," he said then.

    Benedict also met with three people who said they were childhood victims of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy. E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

    Share this on:
    Mixx Digg Facebook del.icio.us reddit StumbleUpon Myspace | Mixx it | Share

    All AboutPope Benedict XVI

  • Solace1998
    Solace1998

    this is a problem in all religions and i think jws should admit it and apologize too.

  • KW13
    KW13

    now that is what we need the Society to do, so then i can run up to the nearest hall and ask them how they are different from the Catholic Church, and infact how they are worse because the Catholic Church did it first...

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    He asked those attending the mass to help their bishops to end the abuse.

    "It is an urgent priority to create a safer, more wholesome environment, especially for young people," he said.

    So is Pope Benedict saying it's up to the lay people of the church to create a safer environment? Are the lay people the ones in charge of the priests? I don't get it. Where's an action plan for the church hierarchy -- to bring the guilty priests to justice, and to stop shuffling pedophile priests from country to country or parish to parish, as if that solves the problem?

    I judge Benedict and his hierarchy by their actions, not their words.Words are not enough.

    If you go to the SNAP website (Surivors Network of those Abused by Priests), you'll see the hurt over the injustice still lingers. Here are just two news items I found there from 2004 and 2006:

    http://www.snapnetwork.org/news/international/australia_hidden_sins_of_church.htm

    Hidden Sins of the Church

    The Sydney Morning Herald
    June 17, 2006

    As a 10-year-old altar boy, Peter McCloskey was raped by a priest. Years later, in an attempt to exorcise his demons, he scoured church records for answers - and came up against a brick wall. Linda Morris reports.

    WHEN Peter McCloskey took his own life in April, the Catholic Church might have thought another sordid chapter of clerical sex abuse had been closed.

    But a search for understanding, justice and compensation has taken the McCloskey family on a journey halfway around the world to the doorstep of the Sydney Archbishop, Cardinal George Pell.

    Father Denis Daly, the priest who abused McCloskey as a 10-year-old altar boy in Limerick, Ireland, had served as a priest in Sydney between 1951 and 1963.

    According to McCloskey's family, the priest had had a run-in with Sydney police over what was described as a "moral lapse". He was shuffled to Western Australia and then was allowed to serve in San Francisco and England before heading back to Ireland.

    The family maintains that even beyond the grave, Daly has enjoyed the protection of the Catholic Church, both in Limerick and Sydney.

    At a press conference called in Ireland in April, Peter McCloskey's mother, Mary, blamed the Irish church for her son's death.

    Peter had been her blond, curly-haired baby with big brown eyes who had grown up into an outgoing, vivacious man, albeit with serious behavioural problems.

    Piously Catholic, the family felt double-crossed. Not only had they to comprehend the impact of the sexual abuse, they had to deal with what they saw as the Irish church's flawed and excessively legalistic response. And they believe the heartache could have been avoided had the Sydney church taken action against their troublesome priest all those years ago.

    Father Daly was one of the many Irish immigrant priests who came to Australia to serve a growing flock. He arrived fresh from the seminary at St Patrick's College, Carlow, a week before Christmas in 1951.

    He was appointed to a succession of parishes including Forest Lodge, Manly, Beverly Hills and St John of God, Richmond, never stopping long.

    Extracts of Daly's file compiled by Pauline Garland, the archivist for the Sydney diocese, suggest Daly had a "considerable problem with alcohol" and was "not responsive to professional psychiatric intervention".

    The files mention a "very grave incident" and the bad behaviour of Daly at a wedding in 1957. A year later, Cardinal Gilroy, the archbishop of Sydney, tried to impress on Daly the need to take a holiday in light of his state of "exhaustion".

    In 1963 Daly ran foul of the NSW police. The church's file referred to the problem as a "moral lapse". Police directed that he undergo psychiatric treatment, and the case was suspended on condition that he left NSW.

    That a Catholic priest was run out of town might have been enough to have alerted the church authorities. Instead, Joseph McCloskey, Peter's brother, said the church washed its hands of the priest, shifting him out of sight to Western Australia.

    After three years of satisfactory service in Perth, he returned to Sydney, this time the parish of Penshurst, whereupon the police insisted he quit NSW a second time. Cardinal Gilroy wrote: "I recalled Father Daly to Sydney in the expectation that the three years' absence would have satisfied the requirements of the police. In this I was mistaken."

    From Sydney Daly was appointed to a parish in San Francisco, and then sought supply work in England. He later returned to Ireland, to be closer to his family.

    In 1978 the Bishop of Connor and Down in Ireland wrote to Sydney for a confidential assessment of Daly's character before appointing him as a diocesan priest, only to be told by Sydney he had left "this archdiocese under a cloud because of a moral lapse".

    "What is extraordinary about Father Denis Daly is him being transferred and wandering the world as a locum priest, if you like, with a letter from his bishop saying he is free to work," said Colm O'Gorman of the Irish victims' support group, One Of Four. "It was only when the diocese was asked by other dioceses could they incardinate him that Sydney ever mentioned his moral lapse."

    It was in Limerick in 1981 that Peter McCloskey, aged 10, encountered Daly, a supply priest in the local parish of Christ the King at Caherdavin, Limerick.

    In 2002, 15 years after the death of Daly, when the Irish church was encouraging victims of abuse to come forward, McCloskey made contact through his solicitors with the diocese of Limerick. Only later did Peter tell his brother that Daly had raped him in the sacristy before and after Mass.

    Peter began his search for the truth. He flew to Sydney in February 2004, where he demanded to see Daly's file and met members of the diocese's Professional Standards Board.

    It was in Sydney that he discovered the priest's run-in with the police.

    He later wrote to one of the Irish churchmen handling his case that he had travelled alone, his only companion being his "never-ending determination to discover the truth". "I can only describe it as a journey into the valley of Satan himself," he wrote.

    Peter McCloskey described his case as explosive, one that could bring "the church in three continents to its knees", and he ended the correspondence quoting Ernest Hemingway: "You can decide to die on your feet or live on your knees".

    His health, fragile anyway, began to deteriorate. McCloskey returned to Ireland and was admitted to a psychiatric unit, suffering repeated bouts of mental illness.

    On April 1 this year, at the age of 37, the father of three daughters was found dead two days after a mediation meeting with the Limerick diocese appeared to break down.

    The church, Mary McCloskey declared shortly after, had nailed her son to the cross "well in advance of Good Friday". She said: "Nothing can now wipe away the pain that Peter suffered throughout his life, but justice through the truth that he valued more than life itself can be testament to his memory."

    Cardinal George Pell joined Bishop Donal Murray, leader of the Limerick church, to express his "deep sadness".

    Three weeks after Peter McCloskey's death, Murray publicly accepted "the truth of Peter McCloskey's experience of clerical child sexual abuse", describing him as a man of extraordinary honesty, integrity and courage.

    He admitted the diocese had failed to properly inform itself of Daly's suitability for ministry.

    But Murray also defended his church's record, saying that it was only fears for McCloskey's fragile mental state that stopped them originally disclosing the contents of the Sydney file.

    That file on Daly detailed his problem with alcohol - but there was nothing, Bishop Murray said, to alert the church to any allegation of the sexual abuse of minors.

    The diocese of Limerick and the archdiocese of Sydney had contacted NSW police in an attempt to discover the nature of the "moral lapse", but discovered there were no records on Daly.

    Nor could the church pin down a rumour, emanating out of Sydney, that it might have involved an "adult sexual matter". In any event, McCloskey was unwilling to consider even the possibility that the police complaint against Daly was anything other than child sexual abuse, the bishop said.

    For its part, the Sydney diocese does not accept responsibility for abuse suffered by McCloskey in another diocese where Daly was permanently located. Nor that it failed in its duty to protect Catholics, particularly children.

    "We do not know if other action pertinent to the norms of the time was undertaken by the then church authorities because the file is silent and the witnesses are not available," said the archdiocese's chancellor, John Usher. "There is an assumption that the priest's then issue with the NSW police did not involve matters with children as we would expect that such complaints would usually have been recorded by the police.

    "There is nothing to suggest that the archdiocese did not pass to overseas church authorities all the relevant information it needed concerning the priest when required.

    "In terms of obligations they are clearly different today in that they are informed by recent significant developments in the means of learning and the education of church authorities concerning pyscho-sexual dysfunction and by the development of civil law accountabilities."

    Joseph McCloskey disagrees. "The Archdiocese of Sydney enabled Father Denis Daly to work in an area which afforded him unique access to children," he said.

    "They did this despite knowing that there were serious issues around his behaviour. They endorsed his ministry on three continents and provided letters of referral and good character from 1963 until his death.

    "Does anyone really believe that a moral lapse in 1963 referred to an encounter with an adult male or female?

    "In 1963, the NSW Police insisted on his removal and repeated that demand in 1966. My brother Peter was born in 1969, six years after the police removed Father Denis Daly for the first time. The greater sin is committed by those clergy that enabled a pedophile to run free in the precious world of childhood and innocence."

    Weeks after Peter McCloskey left Australia following his fact-finding mission, a second complaint against Daly was made in Sydney.

    The diocese accepts it related to child sexual abuse dating back to Manly in 1957 and says the matter has now been settled to the satisfaction of the complainant.

    O'Gorman says while the Sydney diocese had helped Peter by providing him Daly's file, it had so far failed to acknowledge its historic and Christian responsibility.

    "No one is saying Cardinal Pell is personally responsible but there is an institutional and an archdiocesan responsibility that should be acknowledged.

    "This is not about blame, but over 30, 40 years they failed their Christian responsibility to make sure that a priest like Father Daly was not in ministry with vulnerable people."

    http://www.snapnetwork.org/news/international/hundreds_priests_shuffled.htm

    Newspaper: Hundreds of priests shuffled worldwide, despite abuse allegations June 20, 2004

    DALLAS (AP) - An international movement of Roman Catholic priests out of countries where they have been accused of abusing children has continued even after the abuse scandal that swept the U.S. church in 2002, the Dallas Morning News found in a year-long investigation.

    Hundreds of priests accused of abuse have been moved from country to country, allowing them to start new lives in unsuspecting communities and continue working in church ministries, the newspaper reported in Sunday editions.

    The priests lead parishes, teach and continue to work in settings that bring them into contact with children despite church claims to the contrary, the newspaper said.

    Vatican officials declined to comment Friday after an overview of the investigation was featured on National Public Radio.

    In one case, Rev. Frank Klep, a convicted child molester who has admitted abusing one boy and is wanted on more charges in Australia, was placed in Apia, Samoa, in the South Pacific. Australia has no extradition treaty with Samoa.

    Klep told the newspaper that neither he nor the church feels an obligation to tell anyone about his past. Few, if any, locals are aware of his history.

    "I'd prefer to just leave it," Klep said. "If I felt I was still a risk to their children, then I'd think differently. But I don't think I am at risk anymore."

    The Morning News said Klep's order, the Salesians of Don Bosco, has long moved priests accused of sexual abuse from country to country, away from law enforcement and victims.

    Influential Salesian officials have spoken out against co-operating with law enforcement agencies investigating sex abuse allegations.

    "For me it would be a tragedy to reduce the role of a pastor to that of a cop," said Oscar Cardinal Rodriguez of Honduras, a Salesian who has been mentioned as a possible successor to Pope John Paul II. "I'd be prepared to go to jail rather than harm one of my priests."

    Among the newspaper's findings:

    - Nearly half of the more than 200 cases identified involved clergy who tried to elude law enforcement. About 30 remain free in one country while facing ongoing criminal inquiries, arrests warrants or convictions in another.

    - Although most runaway priests remain in the church and should be easier to locate than other fugitives, police and prosecutors often fail to take basic steps to catch them.

    - Dozens of priests who are no longer eligible to work in the United States have found sanctuary abroad.

  • quietlyleaving
    quietlyleaving

    Catholic victims of abuse by priests have been fighting long and hard. I was shocked at how many obstacles, disbelief and problems they faced over on SNAP. It kinda put the JW child abuse problem into perspective and helped me to move on from expecting a greater resolution (within the wts) anytime soon.

  • Mightyone
    Mightyone
    It kinda put the JW child abuse problem into perspective and helped me to move on from expecting a greater resolution (within the wts) anytime soon.

    The thing is, there is no solution outside of reading hearts and minds, which none of us can do.

    There will be molestors, they will lie. On occasion, however, there will also be individuals with a grudge that will place a false claim of molestation. Molestors should have the same treatment dished to them that they inflict on their innocent victims. But, I do get tired of this topic, nobody has offered any solution. Do we take EVERY claim of molestation seriously and God help the poor soul that is falsely accused? How do we stop stepdad from touching his teenage stepdaughter/son..Do we hold parents responsible? What about the wife that ignores her filthy husband and what he is doing to the kids because somehow this speaks against her womanhood?

    My heart aches for any child that has their innocence robbed from them. But how do we stop it? The WTBS has some good safegaurds in place for the person accused falsely as well as those victims. I have heard some say that it is better to take a knee-jerk reaction and look into every case for the good of the child. What about the stepdad that works hard for his family and has a couple of resentful kids that don't want a step parent. They make an accusation and his life is over. We know how society in general views even those accused of molestation. What did that man do to deserve loosing his job, friends, standing in his church?

    Alot of the molestation cases I read on silent lambs and other sites are just that, parent/ stepparent offenders. How do you stop that from taking place in someones home? I have also read of people allowing their adolescent daughter spend days out in service with a middle aged brother. WTF, the parents of that little girl should lose their parental rights. No parent in their right mind would allow their child to spend untold hours with someone, especially if they do not have children of their own...

  • quietlyleaving
    quietlyleaving

    mightyone

    The thing is, there is no solution outside of reading hearts and minds, which none of us can do.

    My comment was regarding those who have confessed. The society's policy in such cases is shameful.

    There will be molestors, they will lie. On occasion, however, there will also be individuals with a grudge that will place a false claim of molestation. Molestors should have the same treatment dished to them that they inflict on their innocent victims. But, I do get tired of this topic, nobody has offered any solution. Do we take EVERY claim of molestation seriously and God help the poor soul that is falsely accused? How do we stop stepdad from touching his teenage stepdaughter/son..Do we hold parents responsible? What about the wife that ignores her filthy husband and what he is doing to the kids because somehow this speaks against her womanhood?

    I think every claim of child abuse does need to be taken seriously.

    Regarding solutions. I agree that sexual abuse is very common and there are no easy solutions. But on the other hand the wts is very good at protecting its own interests against awkward questioning of JW doctrinal matters for example. Dissenters are quickly labelled apostates and banished. How about using some of that expertise to protect vulnerable children.

    My heart aches for any child that has their innocence robbed from them. But how do we stop it? The WTBS has some good safegaurds in place for the person accused falsely as well as those victims.

    Do you mean the 2 witness rule?

    I have heard some say that it is better to take a knee-jerk reaction and look into every case for the good of the child. What about the stepdad that works hard for his family and has a couple of resentful kids that don't want a step parent. They make an accusation and his life is over. We know how society in general views even those accused of molestation. What did that man do to deserve loosing his job, friends, standing in his church?

    Conversely most abusers do work hard for their families. And very often this is one of the reasons families keep quiet about abuse.

    I have also read of people allowing their adolescent daughter spend days out in service with a middle aged brother. WTF, the parents of that little girl should lose their parental rights. No parent in their right mind would allow their child to spend untold hours with someone, especially if they do not have children of their own...

    How many times did that happen?

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    at least he is appologizing - if only the GB and Jackass would also

  • Graham G.
    Graham G.

    My Witness Mother called me over the weekend to speak mockingly over the Pope's apology and said "Good thing that child abuse will never happen in our Society". I almost started foaming at the mouth!! How can any witness be so ignorant?? (She lives in Holland, I live in the US, she thinks I'm still a WTS slave)

    I told her, as calmly as possible about the $ 12 million dollar paid in Child abuse case settlements last September by the WTS. She was quiet for a while and then just changed the subject.

    I went straight through my heart when she said that her and another old Witness lady were convinced this would never happen among the witnesses. "we haven't heard any of that over here?" Sad....

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit