This guy is totally fanatical about this. I've never seen a person so adament about being correct, when everything is clearly showing him to be incorrect.
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/jehovahs-witness/TPA7OQ7G4HGVP9GN5
Boy Third Witness does not give in with the 607 debate!!!
by whereami 3 Replies latest watchtower bible
-
whereami
-
JCanon
Interesting.
The chronology will not change until some noted professor gets convinced that there was a conspiracy by the Persians to fake the death of Xerxes and make him Artaxerxes. Then at least an alternative scholarship on the dating that aligns with Martin Anstey will ensue. It's not that some, like Martin Anstey, haven't figured out that 455 BCE has to be the Biblical date for the first of Cyrus. It is just consistently suppressed by the anti-Biblical academic world.
The VAT4956 proves what the original chronology was, so there is no worry about aligning 529 BCE with 1992. Changing the timeline I think is easy for the NB Period but it causes problems for the Classical Greek Historians who have to expose Plato, Aristotle and Xenophon as paid Persian co-conspirators to revise the chronology. I don't think the classical historians actually want to have everybody knowing that Aristotle was the boy-lover of Socrates originally, even though now gay issues are more openly accepted these days.
Thanks for the list.
JC
-
wha happened?
that guy is still around?
-
AnnOMaly
I see 'Lars' doesn't give in with this debate either LOL. JC, you really are in one of your manic posting frenzies at the moment - on this board and that one - the keys on your keyboard must be worn down to the circuitry by now.