Questions on WTBTS abortion teachings

by Skimmer 5 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Skimmer
    Skimmer

    Granted that the WTBTS is, in general, anti-abortion. Interestingly, I can't find a reference to it in the _Pay Attention_ elders' manual, although tobacco and breast caressing are worthy of mention as being offensive.

    I have encountered reports that the official WTBTS abortion teaching includes the idea that an unborn child who dies as a result of abortion or miscarriage is considered NOT to be eligible for a resurrection in Paradise Earth, let alone a residence in heaven.

    Isn't this more than a little inconsistent with the WTBTS "body equals soul" teaching? If an unborn child is not considered human and is so denied a future, then why is a JW female punished (by being disfellowshipped, I assume) if she has an abortion?

    Can anyone here relate any stories about women who had an abortion while in the WTBTS? Names or other identifying details are unimportant.

  • Grout
    Grout

    IIRC, to the WT's professional gnat-filterers, the body must breathe ("the breath of life") to be a living soul. Something about how the Hebrew word for "soul" is suggestive of breathing. Fetuses, no matter how advanced, don't breathe.

    --
    Chip Salzenberg: Free-Floating Agent of Chaos

  • paulvarjak
    paulvarjak

    I've always thought this to be inconsistent.

    One of thier abortion "proof texts" is Exodus 21:22,23 which concerns a pregnant woman being injured (which they extend to the fetus). If this happened, the life of the injurer was to be taken "soul for soul".

    Yet the baby doesn't have a soul to be resurrected?

    paul

  • Skimmer
    Skimmer

    If the breath of life is needed to define a living soul, what about surgery patients who are on heart-lung apparatus and who don't breathe for hours? Are the dead souls? Suspended souls? When they resume breathing on their own, are they resurrected souls?

    Does the WTBTS have a definite teaching on when life begins? If so, is it different as to when a life is deemed worthy of a resurrection?

    Anyone with a WTBTS CD-ROM out there who could look up the answers?

  • dungbeetle
    dungbeetle

    ABORTION (Insight book)

    The expulsion of an embryo or fetus before it can live on its own. Common use often distinguishes between abortion and miscarriage, the former being defined as the deliberate and induced emptying of a pregnant uterus, the latter being considered as the accidental and unavoidable interruption of pregnancy. The distinction between abortion and miscarriage is not made in the Bible; there the terms are used in a broader and interchangeable sense. The Hebrew sha·khal', meaning "suffer an abortion" (Ex 23:26), is also rendered "bereave" (De 32:25), 'bereave of children' (Le 26:22), 'miscarry' (Ho 9:14), and "prove fruitless" (Mal 3:11). The Hebrew word yoh·tse´th, rendered "abortion" in Psalm 144:14, is from a root meaning "come out." (Compare Ge 27:30.) The expressions "miscarriage" and "one prematurely born" (Ps 58:8; Ec 6:3) render the Hebrew word ne'phel, which comes from the root na·phal', meaning "fall."-Compare Isa 26:18.

    Unavoidable abortion or miscarriage may be caused by accident, infectious disease, mental or physical stress and strain, or because of a general organic weakness on the part of the mother. The waters near Jericho were death dealing, causing miscarriages, until Jehovah's prophet Elisha healed them.-2Ki 2:19-22.

    Deliberately to induce abortion or miscarriage by artificial means, by the use of drugs, or by medical operation, the sole purpose of which is to avoid the birth of an unwanted child, is an act of high crime in the sight of God. Life as a precious gift from God is sacred. Hence God's law to Moses protected the life of an unborn baby against more than criminal abortion, for if in a fracas between men a pregnant woman suffered an accident fatal to her or the child, "then you must give soul for soul." (Ex 21:22-25) Of course, before applying that penalty, the circumstances and degree of deliberateness were taken into consideration by the judges. (Compare Nu 35:22-24, 31.) But emphasizing the seriousness of any deliberate attempt to cause injury, Dr. J. Glenn comments: "The viable embryo in the uterus IS a human individual, and therefore destroying it, is a violation of the sixth commandment."-The Bible and Modern Medicine, 1963, p. 176.

    Properly viewed, the fruitage of the womb is a blessing of Jehovah. (Le 26:9; Ps 127:3) Hence, in promising to prosper Israel, God gave assurance of successful culmination of pregnancy and the bringing forth of children, saying: "Neither a woman suffering an abortion nor a barren woman will exist in your land." (Ex 23:26) As indicated in the prayer of the righteous, on the other hand, evidence of God's disfavor to his enemies would be their having miscarrying wombs and their becoming like miscarriages that never see the sun.-Ps 58:8; Ho 9:14.

    Job in his misery contemplated that it would have been better had he been "a hidden miscarriage." "Why from the womb did I not proceed to die?" this tormented man cried out. (Job 3:11-16) Solomon, too, reasoned that a prematurely expelled fetus is better off than the person who lives a long time but who never comes to enjoy life.-Ec 6:3.

    Contagious abortion, a disease characterized by premature birth, may occur among animals such as cattle, horses, sheep, and goats. Accidental abortion due to neglect or disease of domestic animals has also been known since the days of the patriarchs Jacob and Job.-Ge 31:38; Job 21:10.

    WT 4/15/99
    ..The second question is: Would doing this work make one an accomplice in a condemned practice? Clearly, a person employed in a gambling den, an abortion clinic, or a house of prostitution would be an accomplice in an unscriptural practice. Even if his daily work there was merely sweeping floors or answering the telephone, he would be contributing to a practice that God's Word condemns.

    Comment...implies that even WORKING in an abortion clinic sweeping floors is a disfellowshipping offense.

    WT 4/1/97

    What if a Christian does not feel that his conscience permits him to serve on a particular jury? The Bible does not mention jury duty, so he cannot say, 'It is against my religion to serve on any jury.' Depending on the case, he might state that serving on the jury for a particular case is against his personal conscience. That might be so if a case involves sexual immorality, ABORTION, manslaughter, or another issue on which his thinking is shaped by Bible knowledge, not by mere secular law. In reality, though, it is quite possible that the trial he is selected for does not involve such issues.

    Comment: 'shaped by Bible knowledge'...or Governing Body flip-flop...

    WT 12/15/96
    Although Jehovah's Witnesses are not anticulture, they realize that Jehovah hates many practices that are widely accepted today. Some communities condone abortion, blood transfusions, homosexuality, or polygamy. Christians, however, act in accord with God's view of these things. Yes, a godly view will motivate a Christian to hate such practices regardless of whether they are culturally acceptable or not.-Psalm 97:10.

    Comment..equating blood transfusion with abortion...hmmmm.

    <groan>

    BITE ME, WATCHTOWER!!!

  • Skimmer
    Skimmer

    Hello dungbeetle:

    Thank you very much for the extracts.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit