To me, in this post- Fred Franz era, the Watchtower Society can be understood in terms of dire necessity. They have grown so old
and so globally overstretched and so conservative that they vigorously resist changing anything, no matter how stupid or absurd.
Doctrine doesn't matter, the publishers don't matter ( except as willing thralls) and their public image doesn't matter.
In regard to change then, all that remains is dire necessity - and nothing else.
The key to the whole cult's future lies in figuring out what circumstances they cannot avoid and so must adapt to.
I can see three necessities:
Cash flow - yes, they've got lots of assets - but that isn't cash flow. Many of their assets eat up cash - as in heating or maintaining
buildings. Witnesses would never think of openly rebelling - but may prefer the passive agressive act of closing their wallets.
Every year seems to bring more cuts - literature, magazines, food, subscriptions, and redundant Bethelites.
Ah, but you can't have a preaching work without funding can you?
Liability - US courts are extending case law to include the liability of volunteers - and that must send some chills up some
"Theocratic" spines. A church can be sued based on what volunteers have done. Add the blood issue - and throw in some stupid
comments about how non blood surgery is "way superior" and you may have quite a disaster brewing. I continue to think that
this was partly why they downsized Bethel and dumped "Bethel elders". Sir, my attorneys tell me that this Bethel elder said
the following.......... and, of course, his comments represent you.
Collective Arrogance - Apologize? Who, us? What do think this is, the Catholic Church? We're Jehovah's only channel on earth!
Making a habit of never admitting that you're wrong creates a necessity. Somehow, they always 'must be right'!
It's going to be interesting to watch. Declaring the preaching work "fufilled" would be a way out comparable to the Soviet Union
leaving Eastern Europe ( and they ran out of money, too!). Still, that seems too radical --------- yet.
When I was at Bethel, some brothers would offer comments that were calculated and insincere - to trigger a reaction they wanted.
I am certain that the Society does worry about prominent brothers making off hand remarks from the platform or other public venues.
It can get them in legal ( and other) trouble. Who knows what someone might "set off"?
You never know
metatron