Christianity undergoes massive global shift

by Gadget 4 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Gadget
    Gadget

    This link was posted on another group I read.

    I've heard a lot on here about jw's negative growth in the western world, but having huge growth in third world countries. This book claims the same thing is happening in christianity as a whole. This is normally attribued the the greater freedom of information/access to internet/etc that lets people find out 'the truth about the truth', but could it be that the difference in growth rates of jw's around the world just shows they are subject to the same pressures as other 'legitimate/mainstream' religious groups?

    http://dailycamera.com/news/2007/jan/06/eye-openers/

    Eye-Openers: Christianity undergoes massive global shift

    By Richard N. Ostling, For The Associated Press
    Saturday, January 6, 2007

    Associated Press

    What were the key religious developments around the turn of the third millennium Anno Domini?

    Beyond daily headlines, the most important one is probably the ongoing, inexorable shift of Christianity's population and dynamism away from the West and toward a markedly different style in developing nations of the "Global South."

    Gordon-Conwell seminary's Center for the Study of Global Christianity says 62 percent of the world's 2 billion Christians live in Africa, Asia and Latin America, a percentage that's destined to rise.

    Africa's Christian boom since 1900 "may well be the largest shift in religious affiliation that has ever occurred, anywhere," says Penn State historian Philip Jenkins.

    He first examined such trends in "The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity." Oxford University Press, which continues a distinguished record in religious publishing, plans an update of that 2002 title plus a Jenkins tome pondering Christianity's plight in Europe.

    Meanwhile, Jenkins pursues the scenario in "The New Faces of Christianity: Believing the Bible in the Global South" (also Oxford), which skirts Latin America to focus on Africa and Asia.

    He starts from the Anglican Communion's severe split, pitting biblical conservatives across the Global South against America's Episcopal Church, which allows same-sex blessing ceremonies, gay clergy and an openly gay bishop.

    Compared with Westerners, Jenkins observes, younger churches demonstrate "much greater respect for the authority of Scripture, especially in matters of morality; ... a special interest in supernatural elements of Scripture, such as miracles, visions and healings; a belief in the continuing power of prophecy; and a veneration of the Old Testament."

    He calls their strict adherence to biblical teachings traditionalism, not fundamentalism, and says it underlies both spiritual deliverance and political liberation, which in the Global South are fused.

    Exorcisms, belief in the devil and "spiritual warfare" against demonic powers thrive in situations where paganism, witchcraft, omens and even allegations of human sacrifice persist. and Christian alternatives help overcome people's fearfulness.

    Scripture's rural culture of herding, farming and fishing seems more familiar in the Global South than in the West.

    More important, Jenkins says, "the Bible speaks to everyday, real-world issues of poverty and debt, famine and urban crisis, racial and gender oppression, state brutality and persecution" and situations where pestilence and extreme poverty promote "awareness of the transience of life."

    Meanwhile, Western Christians must address "an age of doubt and secularism" where many are lured by ancient spiritual writings the early church deemed spurious and barred from the Bible.

    While Westerners face pressure to interpret the Bible in terms of secular trends, in the Global South secular ideologies "appear false and destructive," representing corruption, sin and death. Churches' moral conservatism is also influenced by Islam and other non-Christian faiths.

    Westerners decry church promises of "health and wealth." But Jenkins regards this as an inevitable byproduct when money and doctors are absent and "it seems impossible to survive without miracles."

    A second eye-opening book about broad trends is "Who Really Cares" (Basic Books) by Arthur C. Brooks, Syracuse University professor of public administration. He crunched available data on U.S. charity and found, to his surprise, that conservatives are far more generous than liberals in donating money, time, and even blood.

    Politics aside, he discovered that on average, Americans who spurn religion are "dramatically less likely" to donate than religiously active citizens, whether conservative or liberal.

    Nor do the devout aid only religious causes. "Religious people are more charitable in every measurable nonreligious way — including secular donations, informal giving, and even acts of kindness and honesty — than secularists."

    That disputes claims that religious faith lacks moral impact, in best-sellers by atheists Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris.

  • Gill
    Gill

    Very interesting post, Gadget.

    However, do you think it possible that 'motive' may be just as important as action.

    Why does the Christian choose to buy his neighbour food when they're hungry. He may well do it because he 'scoring points for the after life.'

    The atheist neighbour may choose not to buy food for the same neighbour because he knows that this same hungry neighbour spent his money on cigarettes, booze and gambling, and he's not planning on scoring any points for the after life.

    Motive matters also.

  • Narkissos
    Narkissos

    Quite thought-provoking, in a bittersweet way.

    So much for "the sense of history". Peoples never behave like scholars -- whether theologians or philosophers or social theorists -- expect them to.

    And nothing is past. Ancient and middle-ages features can still be found, thriving, across the street.

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    Maybe it will help africa. Maybe africa is where europe was 1700 yrs ago.

    I must admit that christians are more charitable than nonbelievers. Of course, there is always their agenda of conversion w the gift.

    S

  • praiseband
    praiseband

    Satanus, just thought you'd be interested in knowing that the message of Christianity is not always shared and a part of the charitable giving because in many countries they are aware that to do so would put the recipients in danger from the political or religious powers in their country. For instance, I had a sponsor child through World Vision in Mozambique and part of my instructions in communicating with her were to not mention God, Jesus, etc. These restrictions did not stop World Vision from sponsoring her and her community with education and medical care. They serve because God calls them to with no expectations of the recipients needing to respond with a conversion to the Christian faith.

    Praiseband

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit