INCREASELY, THERE SEEMS TO BE LIES BEING TOLD TO SUPPORT CREATIONISM AND OTHER BIBLICAL THINGYS.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
FALSE BIBLICAL APOLOGETICS
by badboy 8 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
moshe
WT literature will tell you that many researchers and experts support their viewpoints, while failing to mention that the the ones doing the research and the so-called experts are none other than their own JW's working in the writing department. Usually , anyone they quote is not an expert with an advanced degree in that field,either. If a JW would spend just 30 minutes doing some independent verification of the WT claims, they would see how contrived the articles really are.
-
greendawn
That is the big creation/evolution debate. The evolutionists have a sense of triumphalism as if they have already won the debate but there are many little things out there that can tie any evolutionist in a knot.
-
badboy
IS THIS CHANGING THE SUBJECT?
THERE WAS AN AD FOR ARTISAN BOOKS BELOW,A FEW MOMENTS AGO.
PYRAMIDOLOGY/LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
INTERESTING READING!
-
aniron
Today I was recommended to get these two books:
The World that Perished: An Introduction to Biblical Catastrophism, revided edition, John C. Whitcombe Really in depth, required reading for anyone interested in the subject of the flood.
Dismantling Evolution: Building the Case for Intelligent Design, Ralph O. Muncaster. One of the best books to read on this subject. I was told. -
badboy
RECOMMENDED BY THE ADS?
-
under_believer
I don't understand why anybody who believes in the Bible needs the creation account to be literally true, why that affects their faith at all.
-
Leolaia
Yes, what a truly scholarly book it is:
-
PrimateDave
I am almost done reading Wisdom of the Bones: in Search of Human Origins by Walker. A lot of time and energy is spent searching for these fossils. They have done some amazing detective work in their search for answers. Then I went on the web to search for homo erectus and Turkana boy. Interestingly, there are web sites by "creationists" that make up their own answers to refute the evolutionary origins of mankind. Apparently, they must know better than the scientists who have spent years poring over the data and examining the fossils and excavation sites. (sarcasm) Needless to say, I haven't wasted any of my time with those web sites.
Dave