http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArSKfz0RU5b34Dt._5V3corsy6IX?qid=20060722232313AALCBo4
It's like reading something that teaches you how not to make a logical argument.
by ColdRedRain 1 Replies latest jw friends
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArSKfz0RU5b34Dt._5V3corsy6IX?qid=20060722232313AALCBo4
It's like reading something that teaches you how not to make a logical argument.
This is what has always surprised me about them manufacturing their Legal Dept. out of loyal Dubz.
LOgic (obviously) is the most important part of manufacturing a legal argument, and in many cases it is impossible to learn to become "logical".
No offense, but believing this stuff automaticcaly disqualifies you from being "logical", although it really amuses me when they use phrases like "a reasonable person would accept" or the like to make the reader believe that the problem lies not with the material but with the reader.
Their guilt building efforts are designed to wipe any logical vestiges right out of the Dub.