new ruling in Boston...

by stillconcerned 3 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • stillconcerned
    stillconcerned

    http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=91413&format=text

    High court makes landmark church abuse ruling By Michael Kunzelman / Associated Press

    Suffolk Superior Court Judge Herman Smith Jr.'s ruling earlier this month is believed to be the first time a court has ruled that church officials have a "fiduciary duty" to members of their congregation. Lawyers and doctors already owe a similar legal responsibility to their clients and patients.

    Smith's ruling also is expected to open another legal channel for attorneys to bring civil suits against churches for clergy abuse cases, according to Lisa Bruno, news editor for Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.

    "It gives another piece of ammunition to plaintiffs, another grounds for finding a church liable for the actions of priests and ministers," Bruno said.

    Carmen Durso, a lawyer who settled 40 lawsuits against the Catholic Boston Archdiocese in 2003, said he expects Smith's ruling to pave the way for more clergy abuse cases to proceed.

    "It affords another basis, a stronger basis, for bringing claims against churches in sex abuse cases," Durso said.

    "There have been a number of rulings that have gone the other way," he added. "We had pretty much given up on this issue."

    The girl at the center of Smith's ruling was between 9 and 11 when her alleged assailant, a ministerial servant with the Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, molested her, during Bible study classes in her home, Lawyers Weekly reported.

    The girl's parents, who learned about the alleged abuse in August 2000, sued the ministerial servant and two Boston-area Jehovah's Witness congregations for negligence as well as breach of fiduciary duty.

  • stillconcerned
    stillconcerned

    ...oops...

    just saw the prior post...

  • Miss_MG
    Miss_MG

    What happend with the court case?

  • Gerard
    Gerard

    So, what does "fiduciary duty" translate to into plain English?

    Does this make only the individual liable? Or the Elders? Or all of involved parties including the WT's GB?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit