jubilee

by peacefulpete 7 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete

    First off let it be said that this is not a thread about mystical calculations or prophecy it is I hope a stimulus for a healthy discussion about ancient history. The Sabbath and Jubilee directives in Lev 25 and Deut 15 have stirred much research but yet so much remains uncertain. First there is no evidence from the Bible or history that the jews ever practiced a Jubilee. By Jubilee I mean the 49-50 year celebrtation wherein all agrarian debts were cancelled and farmers and others sold into slavery were freed. I say 49-50 because even that is a matter of debate. Jews and Christians alike have sought to interpret the wording to no consensus. no matter. What is interesting it that idea of a Clean Slate for all aggrarian debts and slaves.

    It is of special note that the idea of a Clean Slate for debts was centuries old by the time these Bible pages were written. The Babylonians declared such a clean slate at the innaguration of each new King and otherwise as the need arose. There is some evidence the Syrians did likewise. This was good economics. Being that these cultures were almost exclusivly agrarian, it simply was not good for the nation to have farmers going out of business and being sold to work for the wealthy for subsistance. So the idea was not original to the Jews but that they combined it with a calendar cycle appears to be their baby. The Sabbath of sevens was current in other cultures including Ugaritic Syria as I recall. Since the word Sabbath and idea itself being Babylonian it is not surprising that the concept seems to have first been assimilated into Yahwaism post exile. The Jewish 7 cyles of 7 years (49) may have had some use to coordinate the lunar and solar calenders and only later combined with the idea of a clean slate debt erasure.

  • Narkissos
    Narkissos
    The Sabbath of sevens was current in other cultures including Ugaritic Syria as I recall. Since the word Sabbath and idea itself being Babylonian it is not surprising that the concept seems to have first been assimilated into Yahwaism post exile. The Jewish 7 cyles of 7 years (49) may have had some use to coordinate the lunar and solar calenders and only later combined with the idea of a clean slate debt erasure.

    The explanation I recall is that a full moon festival is attested in Ugarit as well as in Babylon (there with the Akkadian name shappatu). While the exact derivation of the Hebrew shabbath is dubious, this pattern suits the older Bible texts which mention it together with the new moon (2 Kings 4:23; Amos 8:5; cf. Isaiah 66:23; Ezekiel 46:1). One current explanation for the priestly and post-exilic seventh day (shb`, first pun) where one has to cease (shbth, second pun) specific activities is that it was combined with another distinct Babylonian feature, namely the ill-fated days on the 7th, 14th, 21th and 28th days of each month when some activities were forbidden. Of course the Jubilee system is a still later, mostly theoretical development as you pointed out (the cancelling of debts was to occur every 7th year according to Deuteronomy 15).

  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete

    I was shooting from the hip again at work. yes narkisssos you're right the release of the slaves was to occur in 7 years according to Deut but every 49-50 according to the later Leviticus 25:40. Only Lev. mentions the land returning to owners every Jubilee. There is much effort to harmonize these texts and identify the editing process they went through but the doctrine of 'clean slate' was what i found most interesting. Do you have any info about the Babylonian practice of transferring land back to owners. One article remarked that the concept may have roots in the theological idea of divine ownership of the land. IOW noone really owned the land, they just used it by divine providence. This was also a tenet of Baalist theology.

  • Narkissos
    Narkissos

    I don't remember about land ownership right now, but about slavery for debt there is an interesting parallel in Hammurabi's Code (117):

    If any one fail to meet a claim for debt, and sell himself, his wife, his son, and daughter for money or give them away to forced labor: they shall work for three years in the house of the man who bought them, or the proprietor, and in the fourth year they shall be set free.

    This sounds more "socially advanced" than Exodus 21 which limits slavery to 6 years.

  • Narkissos
  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete

    Thanks, that was actually one of the articles I read last week. The most complete Babylonia text that dirrected the return of debtor's land is Ammisaduqa’s misharun from around 1640 BCE. According to the notes Finkelstein and others did articles years ago on the subject. I only wish more was put on the web. I should have caught the Hammurabi Code parallel. I usually check a book entitiled 'Old Testament Parallels' for such things, it was there.

  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete






    COLLECTIONS

    OF
    LAWS

    FROM

    MESOPOTAMIA

    AND

    ASIA

    MINOR





    ,



    The Edict of Ammisaduqa



    It was the custom in Mesopotamia during the Old Babylonian period, but going back possibly to late Early Dynastic times, for the kings to proclaim an act of "justice" or "equity" (Sumerian n ig . s i. s a = Akkadian
    rriisarum)
    at the beginning of their reigns and at intervals of seven or more years thereafter. Such acts, concerned mainly with the remission of debts and other obligations, as well as the reversion of land holdings to their original owners, were known heretofore from allusions to them in royal year-names, and references to them in certain private legal documents. The Edict of Ammisaduqa, the loth ruler of the Hammurabi Dynasty in Babylon (1646-1626 b.c.), represents the only extant substantial text proper of such an edict, the only other one known being a fragment of a similar edict issued by Samsuiluna (1749-1712 b.c.), the great-grandfather of Ammisa­duqa. There is good reason to believe, however, that the early law-"codes," such as those of Ur-Nammu, Lipit-Ishtar, the king­dom of Eshnunna, and the great "code" of Hammurabi incorpo­rate within their texts at least some of the provisions of the
    misharum-z
    proclaimed by them during the course of their



    3
    This section is treated here independently of the preceding one, although it may contain only a variation of circumstance, or even a repetition of the preceding rule.



    4
    For this and the next section, see
    JAOS,
    lxxxvi,
    pp. 357 ff. "



    5
    The interpretation of this section is extremely problematic due to the obscurity of the descriptive term of the ox (similarly described in § 10) as nigin- n a, and hence its juridical force. The final verb phrase, rendered here in italics, is to be read i b - r i - til (the last sign is over erasure). It remains unclear whether the subject (equally ambigu­ous, as the translation implies) is responsible for full compensation, or whether he is quit by turning over to the owner the remains of the dead animal.



    6
    This section would appear to resemble the goring ox rules of the other law collections (e.g., Eshnunna § 53, Exod. 21135 f.).



    reigns, and it is likely that the well-known "reform" inscription of Urukagina, the last king of Lagash of the Early Dynastic period
    (ca.
    2350 b.c.), is a text of a closely related type.



    The main edition of the Edict is that of F. R. Kraus,
    Bin Edi\t des Konigs Ammisaduqa van Babylon (Studia et Docu-menta ad Jura Orientis Antiqui Pertinentia,
    Vol. v, Leiden 1958)
    based on mss. A (Ni 632 in Istanbul) and B (B.M. 78259, British Museum). The present translation incorporates ms. C, B.M. 80289, the full edition of which is to appear in
    RA,
    lxih
    (1969). As this manuscript provides the beginning of the text, it neces­sitated a new numbering of the paragraphs of the edict, Kraus' § i' becoming here § 3, etc.



    Further literature: J. J. Finkelstein, "Ammisaduqa's Edict and

    the Babylonian 'Law-Codes,'"

    JCS,
    xv (1961), 91 ff.; Kraus,

    "Ein Edikt des Konigs Samsu-iluna von Babylon,"

    AS,
    xvi
    ('965), 225 ff.; Finkelstein, "Some New Misharum Material and

    its Implications,"

    ibid.,
    223 ff. ,



    i: (Text C). The tablet [of the decree which the land was ordered] to hear at the time that the king invoked a
    misharum
    for the land.



    2: (5) The arrears of the farming agents, the shep­ herds, the /w.fz'^w-(agents) 1 of the provinces, and (other) crown tributaries—the ... of their
    firm agree­
    ments

    and the
    promissory notes
    ...
    of their payments are herewith remitted. (10) The collecting officer may not sue the crown tributary for payment.



    3: The "market" 2 of Babylon, the "markets" of the

    country (side), the raV£a«w«3 s -ofncer, which in the . . . tablet, are ...

    to
    the collecting officer—(15) their arrears
    dating from the "Year in which King Ammiditana re­

    mitted the debts which the land had contracted (= year

    21 of Ammiditana)" until the month of Nisan of the

    "Year: Ammisaduqa the king, Enlil having (20) magni­ fied his noble lordship, like Shamash (Text A) he rose

    forth in steadfastness over his country, and instituted

    justice for the whole of his people (= year i of Am­

    misaduqa)"—because the king has invoked the

    misha­

    rum

    for the land, (25) the collecting officer may not sue
    the [. . . ] for payment. • •



    4: Whoever has given barley or silver to an Akkadian
    or an Amorite as an interest-bearing loan, or on die
    melqetum
    basis (30) [or . .. ], and had a document exe­
    cuted—because the king has invoked the
    misharum
    for the land, his document is voided; (35) (Text C) he may
    not collect the barley or silver on the basis of his docu­
    ment.



    5: But if, commencing with the month of Addar II of the "Year in which King Ammiditana destroyed the wall of Udinim constructed by Damqiilishu" (=Year 37 of Ammiditana), (40) he collected by constraint, he shall refund whatever he had received through collection.



    1
    Semiofficial persons who received the cadavers of dead cattle and sheep from the herdsmen of the state herds, see § 12.



    2
    Akk.
    /(arum,
    lit. "port," "quay," but denoting in those instances (and §§ 10-11) the association of traders of each town, which primarily served palace or "state" rather than private interests.



    8
    An official whose main function appears to have been that of recruiting or overseeing the lower rank persons for military-feudal service to the crown, see § 22.



    {526}














    He who does not (thus) make a refund (45) in accord­ ance with the royal decree, shall die.



    6: Whoever has given barley or silver to an Akkadian
    or an Amorite as an interest-bearing loan or on the
    melqetum
    basis, and in the document which he executed
    (50) perpetrated a deception by having it drawn up as a sale or a bailment and then persisted in taking interest, he (i.e., the debtor) shall produce his witnesses, and they shall indict him (i.e., the creditor) for taking inter­ est; because he had distorted his document, his document shall be voided.



    (55) A creditor may not sue against the house of an Akkadian or an Amorite for whatever he had loaned him; should he sue for payment, he shall die.



    7: (Text A) If anyone had given barley or silver as an interest-bearing loan and had a document executed, (ii 30) retaining the document in his own possession, and then stated: "I have certainly not given it to you as an interest-bearing loan or on the
    melqetum
    basis; the barley or silver which I have given you, I have given (as an advance) for purchases, or for the production of profit, or for some other objective," die person who had received the barley or silver from the creditor shall pro­ duce his witnesses to the wording of the document which die lender had denied, and they shall speak (their testi­mony) before god. (ii 40) Because he (i.e., the creditor) had distorted his document and denied the (truth of the) matter, he must pay (to the borrower) six-fold (the amount he had lent him). If he (die creditor) cannot make good his liability, he must die.



    8: (iii) An Akkadian or an Amorite who has received
    barley, silver, or (other) goods either as merchandise for a commercial journey, or as a joint enterprise for die production of profit, (5) his document is not voided (by die
    misharum
    act); he must repay in accordance widi die stipulations of his agreements.



    9: Whoever has given barley, silver, or (other) goods to an Akkadian or an Amorite either (as an advance) for purchases, for a commercial journey, or as a joint enterprise for die production of profit, (10) and had a document executed, (but) in the document he had exe­ cuted, the creditor stipulated in writing that at die expiration of the term (of the contract) the money would accrue interest (15) or if he made any (other) additional stipuladons, he (i.e., the obligee) shall not repay on die terms of the (added) stipulations, but shall repay (only) die barley or silver [on the terms of the (basic) docu­ ment]. The (obligations of the supplementary) stipula­ tions upon the Akkadian (20) or the Amorite are re­ mitted.



    10: [...]...
    to
    Babylon, [die market of . . . ], die market of Borsippa, [die market of . . . ], die market of Isin, [the market of . . . ], die market of Larsa, (25) [the market of ... ]as, die market of Malgium, [die



    market of Mankijsum, the market of Shitullum, [. . . ] half (dieir) investment capital was given
    [them}
    (in die form of) merchandise out of die palace—die (other) half to be made up by diem (i.e., the market associations of the named cities)—(30)
    any
    such merchandise shall be disbursed to diem from die palace at die going price of die respective city.



    ii: If a (state) trading merchant, who customarily disposes of merchandise of die palace, made out a docu­ ment in favor of die palace against the (collectable) arrears of crown tributaries as if he actually received (such) merchandise from die palace, and received (in turn) die (payable) document of the palace-tributary— thus no merchandise was actually given him from die palace in accordance widi his document, nor did he re­ ceive (any funds) from die palace tributary—(40) be­cause the king has remitted the arrears of the palace- tributary, (iv) diat merchant shall declare on divine oadi: "(I swear diat) I have not received anything in payment from the palace-tributaries as stated in this document." After having (dius) declared, (5) he shall produce die document of die palace-tributary, diey (i.e., the author­ities and the principals) shall settle the accounts jointly, and out of the merchandise stipulated in the document made out by die merchant in favor of the palace they shall remit in behalf of the merchant as much as was stipulated by the document made out by die palace-tributary (10) in favor of die merchant.



    12: The
    susit(
    ^«-agent of the land who (15) custom­ arily receives
    [the carcasses}
    from the palace cattle-herds­
    men, shepherds, and goadierds under divine oath, (and)
    who (21) customarily renders to die palace: For every cow carcass: one (quantity) of sinfews] together with the skin; for every ewe-carcass: one-sixth . . .
    barley,
    together with die skin, plus i% minas of wool; for every goat-carcass: one-sixth of
    [a shekel]
    of
    silver
    plus
    %
    of
    a mina of goat-wool,—because the -king has instituted the
    misharum
    for die land, dieir arrears will not be collected. The . . .
    (of)
    die
    fusityu-agent
    of the land (25)
    (the quotas) . . .
    will not be filled.



    13: The arrears of die porter (s) which had been as­ signed to the collecting-agent for collection are remitted; diey will not be collected.



    14: (30) The arrears of die Suhu country 4 consisting of
    hbfum-rents'
    and/(or) half-share rents 8 —because die king has instituted the
    misharum
    for the land, it is re­mitted; it will not be collected. (35) He (i.e., die col­lecting-agent) shall not sue for collection against die houses of Suhu (var.: die Suhian population).



    15: The crop impost officer who customarily receives



    * A territory on the Middle Euphrates, below Mari.



    6
    A kind of rent due on tenanted fields, and payable in produce.



    8
    A rent in which the crop is divided equally between tenant and landlord, and operative usually where the landlord supplied the seed corn and the farming equipment and animals.



    {527}






    the impost proportions of fields (planted to) [barley,] sesame, or minor crops belonging to the palace-tribu­taries, the . . . , the crown dependents, the infantrymen, the sergeants, or other special feudatories—(v) because the king has instituted the
    misharum
    for the land, it is remitted; it will not be proportioned (i.e., the impost shares of each crop will not be collected). (However,) the barley destined for sale or profit will be proportioned according to the customary ratio (s).



    16: (5) The taverness(es) of the provinces who cus­ tomarily pay silver (and/or) barley to the palace— because the king has instituted the
    misharum
    in the land,
    the collecting agent (10) will not sue for payment of their arrears.



    17: A taverness who has given beer or barley as a loan
    may not collect any of what she had given as a loan.



    18: A taverness or a merchant who [. . . ] (15) dis­honest
    weight
    shall die.



    19: The infantryman or the sergeant who has leased [a ... field] for three years does not perform the [ . . . ] service. (20) In the present [year], because the king has instituted the
    misharum
    in the land, the infantryman or the sergeant pays according to the (prevailing) ratio of his city . . . , a third or half (of the crop).



    20: (25) If an obligation has resulted in foreclosure against a citizen of Numhia, a citizen of Emutbalum, a citizen of Idamaras, a citizen of Uruk, a citizen of Isin,



    a citizen of Kisurra, or a citizen of Malgium, (in conse­
    quence of which) he [placed] his own person, his wife
    (30) or his [children] in debt servitude for silver, 7 or
    as a pledge 8 —because the king has instituted the
    misha­
    rum

    in the land, he is released; his freedom (35) is in
    effect.
    ••'-,. -.-'

    .-—.••;:•'



    21: If a house-born slavewoman or male slave of a citizen of Numhia, a citizen of Emutbalum, a citizen of Idamaras, a citizen of Uruk, a citizen of Isin, a citizen of Kisurra, (vi) or a citizen of Malgium . . . whose price . . . , has been sold for money, or was (5) given over for debt servitude, or was left as a pledge, his freedom will not be effected.



    22: (10) The
    ra'ibdnum
    or regional governor who
    gives barley, silver, or wool to the "house" of an infantry­
    man or a sergeant for harvest labor, or for the perform­
    ance of (other) labor, (15) as the result of force, 9 shall
    die. (That) infantryman or sergeant may (at the same
    time) keep (lit.: "carry off") whatever had been given
    him.



    7
    Forcible seizure of a debtor or a member of his family (also of his chattels) by the creditor upon default on the debt.



    8
    Voluntary placement of a dependent or a slave by the debtor with the creditor on an antichreric basis covering only the interest on a debt.



    9

    i.e., the forcible hiring out of subordinates by their superior officers for harvest or other labor to third parties (on a profitable basis), even though their wages were being paid, cf. Code of Hammurabi $ 34. This section is not limited in force to the period of the
    misharum'!,
    effectiveness, but is a statement against such an abuse of authority for permanent effect.



    {528}
















  • peacefulpete
    peacefulpete

    OK I'm really sick of this crazy formatting. For simple folks like me, please explain why this is happening and how to avoid or fix it.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit