Jehovah's Witness Discussion Forum | JW.Org Community Information
The biggest, busiest JW community & support discussion forum for Jehovah's Witnesses, those interested in JW.Org beliefs or the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society
-
41
If you found out TTATT at 80 and spent your entire life at Bethel, what would you do?
by John Aquila inwould you do a ray franz deal and write a book or keep quiet and live out the rest of your life in bethel?.
would you keep reading the watchtower magazine?.
-
30
Recognizing Christ's leadership involves submission to his "brothers." 5/15/2011 WT
by miseryloveselders ini hesitated to do this thread as i thought it was the same article flipper did, but its not the same article.
here's flip's thread for those who missed it.
it's a must read.. http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/207377/1/april-15th-wt-wt-society-says-obeying-us-is-same-as-obeying-god.
-
11
California Out of Water Soon
by Village Idiot inlook closely at the figures below and see how much water california has left from its major source of water the sierra mountains:.
my advice, not that any politician would take it, would be to eliminate most agriculture in the state.
almonds, rice and alfalfa, are all thirsty water guzzling crops that neither those in california nor the rest of the nation needs.
-
I am looking for audios with Julius Mantey
by Doug Mason inas i was going through stuff i have collected, i noticed a couple of audio cassettes advertised in "the scholastic dishonesty of the watchtower" (which i presume you all have).. one cassette is called, "the scholastic dishonesty of the watchtower", with michael van buskirk and julius mantey, while the other is of a 90-minute radio talk program with michael and julius interacting with the audience.. a very quick search located the following, but does not bring me any joy: http://www.worldcat.org/title/scholastic-dishonesty-of-the-watchtower/oclc/12118572.
any clues?.
also with michael's "dishonesty" booklet, i understand it is a chapter from his book, "the sandcastle of the jehovah's witnesses".. what can you tell me about that book?
-
9
MASTER'S THESIS on Charles Taze Russell's sources and ideas
by TerryWalstrom inhttp://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a226955.pdf.
click on the above link and have a most enjoyable read!.
below, the opening paragraph.
-
12
If you masturbate, your hand will get pregnant! Religious ratbaggery is universal
by fulltimestudent inthe jw org.
used to claim (and probably still does) that masturbation would turn you into a homosexual.
they, of course, failed to explain the process by which that happened and since masturbation is likely a near universal practice, the claim fails the test of logic, as homosexuality is not the majority form of sexuality.. but over in the islamic world, an equally illogical claim is made.. mucahid cihad han, a turkish televangelist .
-
Blatter, newest member GB!
by fulano ini just was watching the news tonight.
wouldn't he fit great in the club?
age, manner of speaking.
-
2
No longer the cobe
by iwasblind insorry this is duplicate because i posted the other one in private and did not mean to.. hey guys,.
fade started.. no longer the cobe as of this week.
had the co last week and managed to relieve myself of it.
-
12
Women Make Monkeys Of Men
by Bangalore invindication i (book, 1931) pp.156-157.
the church congregations of christendom are attended chiefly by women, and women have much to do with the policy thereof.
in many of the church organizations women occupy the pulpit and preach and prophesy.
-
10
Type and Anti-Type, the killing of the Faithful and Discreet Slave. Whats thier angle and how do they spin out of this one?
by Crazyguy init would seam that the changing of the type anti-type teaching kills their claim as the faithful and discreet slave class as it is only a parable according to peter at luke 12:41. obviously i don't think they will ever come out and actually say that the f&ds is just a parable, so when one asks what will the answer be, to spin out of this obvious problem?.
also what do you think is the reason for the change in this teaching?
is it more to do with getting rid of doctrine that can be criticized or could it be that they are trying to make it as though they are really not in control of the congregations so as to say we aren't responsible when the prosecution comes knocking over future pedophile case?