AGuest	I stand corrected:
	Apparently, Ms. Ball was about 15 when the matters reported on by Mrs. Russell occurred (note, however, that does not rule out any incidents prior to), Ms. Ball having come to them at age 10 in 1889 and the first report by Ms. Ball occurring in 1894. I would point out, however, and I think the "experts" would back me up, that most young people under age 15 wouldn't report such a thing, certainly if they had been charged not to. I must also comment that simply because a matter is stricken from the record does not make it false: in this case, they were stricken solely because they occurred before Mrs. Russell filed her suit, and she failed to mention them in the suit; the court only allowed what took place within a year before/after the date of Mrs. Russell's suit. But... I'll let the record stand... objections, strikes and all... http://www.geocities.co http://watchtower.observer.org/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040309/HISTORY1/204019 And I will say, that given his "clandestine" conduct... homosexuality didn't seem to be his problem. I bid you all the greatest of peace! A slave of Christ, SJ Oh, BTW, Daddy-O, dear... a few things: 1.  Young women certainly knew how to type/write correspondence, even before age 15.  In fact, during that time, young girls were put to work as young as 10 (if not sooner). 2.  Fifteen is not really all that young, but it would seem young for a man of Mr. Russell's age... and self-imposed status... and certainly questionable in light of his marriage... 3.  I got into Law School!! Start Monday!!! Praise JAH!!!
IP: CyQG1Ry821lBWgqs	by AGuest: Correct formatting