MemberPost
A offense against all involved? by DJK on
Re: A offense against all involved? by Seeker4 on
Re: Re: A offense against all involved? by BurnTheShips on
Re: A offense against all involved? by Seeker4 on
Re: A offense against all involved? by DJK on
Re: A offense against all involved? by White Dove on
Re: A offense against all involved? by White Dove on
Re: A offense against all involved? by White Dove on
Re: A offense against all involved? by wings on
Re: A offense against all involved? by White Dove on
Re: A offense against all involved? by White Dove on
Re: A offense against all involved? by DJK on
Re: A offense against all involved? by White Dove on
Re: A offense against all involved? by DJK on
Re: A offense against all involved? by White Dove on

darth frostyRe: A offense against all involved?


here is my problem.  On one hand they say we must not judge, it is not for us to judge.  yet they will form a JC in the drop of a hat at the slightest offence.  But, when it comes to a 'real' court of law doing their job, they will fight hat process tooth and  nail.  let someone challenge the JC and the appeal body almost always upholds the original decision. fuggin hypocrites.
IP: WH6FPByM2Hc+YK+7

Re: A offense against all involved? by flipper on
Re: A offense against all involved? by LunaFing on
Re: A offense against all involved? by A Mother on