(post 1630222) in Friends

Member	Post

Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by integ on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by poppers on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by AlmostAtheist on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by MidwichCuckoo on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pole on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pshrug on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by tetrapod.sapien on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Honesty on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by jaffacake on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by lawrence on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Rod P on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

M.J. Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.)

Oh and speaking of revisions you might want to revise 1884 to 1874.
What an excellent summary. When you cut to the real heart of their arguments without all the flowery language, it's amazing how ridiculous the whole thing looks.
IP: ff/GsxFiIhTq1slW

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pole on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Blueblades on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by willyloman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by inquirer on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by rocketman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by inquirer on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Black Sheep on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Maverick on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by z on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by AK - Jeff on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by dedpoet on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by TheListener on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by myelaine on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by skyman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by mustang on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by BluesBrother on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DanTheMan on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Rod P on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Kenneson on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by prophecor on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Clam on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Qcmbr on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Chard on

M.J.	Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.)
	Oh and speaking of revisions you might want to revise 1884 to 1874. What an excellent summary. When you cut to the real heart of their arguments without all the flowery language, it's amazing how ridiculous the whole thing looks.
IP: ff/GsxFiIhTq1slW