(post 1630211) in Friends

Member	Post

Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by integ on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by poppers on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by AlmostAtheist on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by MidwichCuckoo on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pole on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pshrug on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by tetrapod.sapien on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Honesty on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by jaffacake on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by lawrence on

Rod P Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.)

Omigod Terry!
I had to read your post in two shifts. I cracked up so bad I couldn't finish it, and had to spend some time cleaning half my egg salad sandwich off the wall. Good thing I had a glass of water close by or I would have choked to death.
You missed your calling as a stand-up comedian! Or maybe you've created a new genre, "the sit-down comedian". No wait, that was Shelly Berman.
I think I'm gonna frame that one, and read it every time I feel a depression coming on. ROFLMAO
You should think about doing a weekly installment. It'll be right alongside Blondie's "Comments You Won't Hear...." and Ozzie's Weekend Poll, I'm sure of it.
After a year or two you could turn it into a book. Then we'll send a copy to each of the JW's. About the time they are able to stop laughing, they will suddenly realize they no longer believe.
We'll call it "Terry's Transparency Treatment for Translating Tricky 'Truths' and Transcending Tortuous Tricksters with their Trifling Triviality, Truculant Tripe and Other Trappings."
Rod P.

IP: qVONrjKM1EDFMQZp

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by M.J. on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pole on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Blueblades on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by willyloman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by inquirer on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by rocketman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by inquirer on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Black Sheep on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Maverick on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by z on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by AK - Jeff on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by dedpoet on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by TheListener on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by myelaine on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by skyman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by mustang on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by BluesBrother on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DanTheMan on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Rod P on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Kenneson on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by prophecor on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Clam on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Qcmbr on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Chard on

Rod P	Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.)
	Omigod Terry! I had to read your post in two shifts. I cracked up so bad I couldn't finish it, and had to spend some time cleaning half my egg salad sandwich off the wall. Good thing I had a glass of water close by or I would have choked to death. You missed your calling as a stand-up comedian! Or maybe you've created a new genre, "the sit-down comedian". No wait, that was Shelly Berman. I think I'm gonna frame that one, and read it every time I feel a depression coming on. ROFLMAO You should think about doing a weekly installment. It'll be right alongside Blondie's "Comments You Won't Hear...." and Ozzie's Weekend Poll, I'm sure of it. After a year or two you could turn it into a book. Then we'll send a copy to each of the JW's. About the time they are able to stop laughing, they will suddenly realize they no longer believe. We'll call it "Terry's Transparency Treatment for Translating Tricky 'Truths' and Transcending Tortuous Tricksters with their Trifling Triviality, Truculant Tripe and Other Trappings." Rod P.
IP: qVONrjKM1EDFMQZp