(post 1630028) in Friends

Member	Post

Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by integ on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by poppers on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by AlmostAtheist on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by MidwichCuckoo on

Terry Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.)

If I were still a JW and read (what I wrote) such a travesty I wonder what my attitude would be?
You defend the indefensible by an act of will and not of intellect, I suppose.
T.
IP: J4vsE9BZf0m9qEGr

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pole on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pshrug on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by tetrapod.sapien on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Honesty on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by jaffacake on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by lawrence on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Rod P on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by M.J. on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Pole on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Blueblades on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by willyloman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by inquirer on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by rocketman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by inquirer on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Black Sheep on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Maverick on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by z on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by AK - Jeff on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by dedpoet on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by TheListener on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by myelaine on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by skyman on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by mustang on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by BluesBrother on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DanTheMan on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Quentin on

Re: Re: Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Rod P on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Kenneson on

Re: Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by prophecor on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Terry on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by DannyHaszard on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Clam on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Qcmbr on

Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.) by Chard on

Terry	Re: Why 1914 is utterly true (and so is 607 B.C.E.)
	If I were still a JW and read (what I wrote) such a travesty I wonder what my attitude would be? You defend the indefensible by an act of will and not of intellect, I suppose. T.
IP: J4vsE9BZf0m9qEGr