MemberPost
GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Maximus on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by gsark on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Maximus on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by hawkaw on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Had Enough on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by CPiolo on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by sf on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Defender on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Trilobite on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Anchor on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by blondie on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by anon on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by anon on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Anchor on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Billygoat on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Francois on

hawkawRe: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood
Anchor,

Thanks

Also key in on the monochorionic pregnancy more than the TTT syndrome.

In 75 to 95 percent of the time these wonderful and beautiful identical babies come into the world after NATURALLY SHARING their WHOLE blood. Not a part, fraction or component - whole blood.

I brought this up with the board and with AJWRB back in March, 2001. My post died an ugly death until Maximus has shown you the way today - thanks big guy. Lee at AJWRB was excited about it when I brought it too his attention but I don't know what Sam or Lee did with it - they are very busy people with a lot on the go. I personally don't write the WTS. I prefer talking to people like Frank Gorman about the WTS (hehehehehe).

But the point is that these blood nazis have spewed how they have doctors on staff (one even wrote in the 1980s the blood fraction part of the doctrine who I think might have left?) and review 3,600 medical journals. You would think unless they went a few rounds with the "stupid stick" that they knew about this at the time they wrote the "natural movement" part of the WT blood doctrine as new light in an October 1 or 15, 1990 WT rag.

So remember when you see that "new light in 10 years from the people connected to God" and another few thousand have needlessly bled to death, those evil devil dudes who only love children already knew what God was thinking and now so do you!!!!

Oh by the way, if you think they knowingly know about this and people are needlessly dying, what paricular definition (one word) should be used to describe certain individuals who are responsible for this almost 11 year policy?

hawk

- hey anyone watching the medical miracles on dateline tonight?? So cool.
IP: bcdp5yPDDsHbJJy6

Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Farkel on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by hawkaw on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Had Enough on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by ozziepost on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by TD on
What the heck, over? by Farkel on
Re: What the heck, over? by TD on
Re: What the heck, over? by Maximus on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by TD on
Re: What the heck, over? by Jeremy Bravo on
Re: What the heck, over? by Jim Lad on
Re: What the heck, over? by Anchor on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by SixofNine on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by Had Enough on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by Jeremy Bravo on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by Eusebius Hieronymus on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by SixofNine on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by CPiolo on
Re: What the heck, over? by Anchor on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Had Enough on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by CPiolo on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by MacHislopp on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Rex B13 on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Eusebius Hieronymus on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Francois on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by waiting on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by purplesofa on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by skyking on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by jimbo on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by greendawn on