MemberPost
GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Maximus on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by gsark on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Maximus on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by hawkaw on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Had Enough on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by CPiolo on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by sf on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Defender on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Trilobite on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Anchor on

blondieRe: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood
I have been wondering since 1980 when transplants were made a conscience matter....1961 okay...1967 not okay....1980 okay. Why should the use of blood be any different.

With blood fractions like hemoglobin allowed in "approved" JW blood products, several questions come to mind.

HemAssist, etc., are made with outdated "stored" human blood donated by only non-JWs.

How can JWs use products made with "stored" donated human blood?
Why then cannot JWs donate blood?

Pretty soon it will be like having a Talmud with all its additions to the law.
IP: MVJd1ha6EwkbP6Be

Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by anon on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by anon on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Anchor on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Billygoat on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Francois on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by hawkaw on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Farkel on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by hawkaw on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Had Enough on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by ozziepost on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by TD on
What the heck, over? by Farkel on
Re: What the heck, over? by TD on
Re: What the heck, over? by Maximus on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by TD on
Re: What the heck, over? by Jeremy Bravo on
Re: What the heck, over? by Jim Lad on
Re: What the heck, over? by Anchor on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by SixofNine on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by Had Enough on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by Jeremy Bravo on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by Eusebius Hieronymus on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by SixofNine on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by CPiolo on
Re: What the heck, over? by Anchor on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Had Enough on
Re: What the heck, over? by waiting on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by hawkaw on
Re: What the heck, over? by CPiolo on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by MacHislopp on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Rex B13 on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Eusebius Hieronymus on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by Francois on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by waiting on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by purplesofa on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by skyking on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by jimbo on
Re: GB Admits It Has No Answers, Blood by greendawn on