:Just think, if you had any balls, you would have demolished my entire argument instead of picking on one premise. But you have no balls because you never took my argument in its entirety. Like the typical dub, you focused on one SMALL part of my argument and lamely attempted to demolish the whole thing on that small part:Okay, Farkel, I tried to be nice but I behold that you like it rough. Nevertheless I will not stoop down to your level and immerse myself in argumentum ad hominem. I'll just make statements in words even you can understand. When you typed your fine piece of work, you had no clue what HC really was/is. You wasted time typing an essay criticizing the WT for something they were never even talking about. They were discussing a particular form of biblical criticism (HC), but you applied the article's sublime counsel about HC to "educated criticism," implying the WT condemned going to college in the articles you cited or you declared they denigrated critical thinking en toto. How can I condescend and dialogue with someone who opens his mouth before engaging his brain? I simply will not do so. Is that rough enough for you, Fark?Love,
DunsDuns the Scot
DunsDuns the Scot