Dunny Boy,
: Just think, if you had some formal education, you would have known what HC was before you wrote your fine dissertation wherein you just knocked down a straw man. :-)
Just think, if you had any balls, you would have demolished my entire argument instead of picking on one premise. But you have no balls because you never took my argument in its entirety. Like the typical dub, you focused on one SMALL part of my argument and lamely attempted to demolish the whole thing on that small part.
Maybe you have no balls, and you are too much of a coward to take on the ENTIRE argument I presented. The only "strawman" was that I asserted that there had to be a "lower" criticism, which I now know there is. I concede. Now move on to the other arguments.
Maximus gave me the elucidation, but that doesn't affect my overall argument. If you think it doesn't, then fire away, windbag!
Now, asshole, the ball is in your court: demolish the rest of my argument vis as vis the Watchtower arguments I presented.
Go for it.
Farkel, who knows that windbags are not likely to think clearly