MemberPost
Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by Marvin Shilmer on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by hawkaw on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by Maximus on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by Maximus on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by waiting on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by hawkaw on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by Maximus on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by Eusebius Hieronymus on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by voltaire on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by bluesapphire on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by bluesapphire on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by ozziepost on

waitingRe: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping
Hey Ozzie,

Aren't they troubled? Doesn't it seem obvious to elders that this organisation that they loyally serve is using a 'legal' device?

A couple of years ago, I asked an elder I knew well about this and other matters that had "wording" changed. Such as, not announcing why a person had been df'd. At the time, I was still active and didn't even know of the term 'disassociation.'

His response? "Because they kept being sued, that's why! Satan is after the Society in any way he can. It's just words - they have to protect themselves."

So....it's ok to change "words" to stay out of court. Such as disfellowshipped to disassociated. "It's just words" - the locals know that no real change has taken place.

waiting
IP: WguVGi4FlgbwpMxj

Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by ozziepost on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by COMF on
Re: Disassociation versus disfellowshipping by waiting on