Whenever the WTS tries to be (IMHO feigns to be) undogmatic in their publications, its just a tactic to counter the criticisms they receive. Be it a court, or a government agency, whatever.....one can point to the ambiguous writings in the literature and argue that the WTS isn't such a controlling/oppressive cult etc....Meanwhile, all the unwritten content, and the social controls still stand and go by whatever the current view is...which as far as I know is still viewed as a no-no...I wouldn't be surprised though if a dub parent who's in a tough custody battle would be overlooked by an elder body and not reproved if she gave her children birthday parties that year.
| Member | Post |
|---|
| Midget-Sasquatch | Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........ | |
| IP: Qx3Adlzhd0SIhvPO |
by Midget-Sasquatch:
Correct formatting | |
Re: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
by
XQsThaiPoes
on
Re: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
by
XQsThaiPoes
on
Re: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
by
XQsThaiPoes
on
Re: Re: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
by
XQsThaiPoes
on
Re: Re: So is there a new stance on B-days or what? Someone please explain........
by
XQsThaiPoes
on