MemberPostViewed: times
FarkelWho Will Cry For the Babies?


Here's something I found on Kent's site just now. I wrote it December last. I didn't know that he purloined it but then again, he purloins lots of stuff, and furthermore I don't save most of what I write. Purloining stuff is not unethical nor is it illegal on the Internet. I've never tried to copyright my stuff because 1) the U.S. Copyright office would say, "You can't copyright drivel!, and 2) I happen to agree with them on that one. So thass ok with me. For those of you who were not H20 regulars here it is for what it's worth. Read and weep about what this religion really is all about:

Will U Cry 4 the Babies?

The Watchtower Printing Corporation has created a serious dilemma for themselves with all of their statements over the decades by stating that only faithful Jehovah's Witnesses (loyal to the ever-changing WTS) and their “unaccountable” children will be saved at Armageddon. “Accountable” children of JW parents (as defined by the Watchtower Printing Corporation) will be toast if they are not baptized and towing the Party line on that fateful day. I know this for a fact, because at the tender age of 12 and after years of indoctrination from the litterachure and the platform I was convinced I was “accountable” because I knew what was in store for me if I didn’t become baptized: I would be worm-fodder because Armageddon was “so close.” I got baptized as a result of that fear. That was forty years ago and I am now a grandfather. Armageddon is "even closer,” though. Phlooooooooot!

Dubs will not generally tell the truth when they are confronted with the question, “Do you believe that ONLY Jehovah’s Witnesses will be saved at Armageddon?” They always come up with some excuse like, “Well, that’s not for us to say. Only Jehovah can read hearts,” even though their literature says exactly the opposite. When a dub makes that excuse and are then further questioned with, “So does that mean you believe that some non-JWs will survive that battle?”, they reply with “Well, that’s not for us to say.” Typical doubletalk.

In recent years the WT magazine has not been so bold in brazenly stating that faithful JWs will be the only ones saved, but they have not officially repudiated their position on it, either. That means it is still “Official Watchtower Policy™” that ONLY loyal dubs are going to make it.

This bothered me even as a child, and especially more so as I was forced to study that masterpiece of child-abuse known as “From Paradise to Paradise Regained,” which was released in 1958. “What about those little innocent and helpless babies?”, I thought. Have you ever asked a dub that question? I have. They are almost cavalier with their typical response, “Well, their parents are accountable for them just as the parents of the Canaanites were accountable for their children.” They say it so coldly, and in such a nonchalant manner. Never have I seen dubs who were asked that question get tears welled up in their eyes and start to cry and grieve over all of that slaughter of children who they believe will have no chance of choice themselves.

Think about this: There will be millions of babies born on that fateful day of Armageddon, eyes not even opened, eager to suckle and take the first breaths of air in their pure, tiny lungs. At the end of the day, these babies and hundreds and hundreds upon millions like them will be fresh corpses, starting to rot and already being consumed by insects and birds. Dubs just don’t seem to CARE about this very real reality in their wacky religious beliefs. Either they are so materialistic and only concerned about saving their own selfish butts and then grabbing the finest cars and homes after the “battle,” or they are so braindead from years of Watchtower indoctrination that they are numb to such carnage and the inherent unfairness of it all. Or both.

I’ve heard some pretty ridiculous “explanations” from dubs who at least attempt to rationalize the insanity of it all. One common one is that these children will be later resurrected. “Then why would God cause them to suffer and die in the first place?”, is my next question. Their answer? “Well, if they all survived Armageddon, there wouldn’t be enough people to take care of them,” is one lame answer they give. “How STUPID is your God that he has to kill hundreds of millions of children because he can’t figure out a way to have them taken care of?”, I ask. “This God made the heavens and the earth, and every living thing. He made millions of super-powerful angels, and millions upon millions of galaxies each of which has billions of stars, he has the ability to make mortals immortal, and he can’t even make baby-sitting arrangements for those children, and has to slaughter them because he can’t figure that part out? That’s not only ridiculous, that’s IDIOTIC!”

It gets worse. What about all the mentally-challenged people, especially severely retarded ones? Will they all get slaughtered because they didn’t understand the dub message of salvation? “Oh, that depends upon their parents, because like children, they are not accountable,” dubs might say. Well, many of these severely retarded people are adults and even very old. Many of their parents have been dead for decades. Are these handicapped people going to get murdered by your God because their parents didn’t accept the dub message decades ago before they died? Is that fair?

What about the millions and millions of infants and toddlers who are in orphanages around the world and the only “parents” they have are the few who administer those orphanages. Are those relatively few administrators responsible for the eternal salvation for the millions and millions of children in their care? If so, is that fair? The children have no say in this. They are helpless and their eternal lives rest upon those administrators buying dub literature and toeing the dub line. Even if some of those administrators DO become dubs, how in the world can they provide Bible studies for the hundred-or-so kids in their care? How can they dress up a hundred kids and haul them to the meetings three times a week? How can they haul a hundred kids around for field service? If they don’t do all of this, according to the WTS, the kids are fried.

Now, if the WTS should ever come out and say, “we believe that others who are not Jehovah’s Witnesses will survive Armageddon,” any reasonable person would say (including reasonable dub), “then WHY IN THE HELL WOULD I EVER WANT TO BE A DUB?”

As I stated at the beginning, the WTS has created quite a dilemma for themselves with the belief that only their followers will be saved. They have not and will not address issues like the ones I’ve brought up because the absurdity of this doctrine will soon come to light. When confronted with the inconvenient and barbaric facts that I’ve mentioned, we can expect this standard answer:

“Trust in Jehovah.”

You bet I will, because I certainly can’t trust your idiotic leaders with ANYTHING.

Farkel
IP: XQb8D4EpA1urV6AW
FrancoisRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Good work, Fark. That's a well thought-out piece. You could turn that into a nice four-pager and use it in the door-to-door work with the new religion announced recently on the board.

Important note: You don't have to do anything to copyright your stuff, at least not with any gummint agency. Copyright automatically inheres in the fact that you wrote something. Some writers put the following on each page (which I think is a little over-kill):

Copyright 2001 - Farkel the Fabulous

or they will use on the cover page:

Copyright 2001 - Farkel the Fabulous
All Rights Reserved

Or some variation of this.

And that's all you need to do. Legally, you don't have to do anything. You have copyrights because you wrote it. Same applies to computer programs.

Emails & bb stuff? Weeeeellllll. I dunno. In a piece like you publish here, I think if you announced you considered a work copyrighted and put the copyright notification at the top of the file, I think you'd be covered. Just a guess on that one.
IP: xKX30HS/QzfwxpNf
TheHighPriestRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Great post Farkel what can I say, spot on.
From Paradise to Paradise Regained, yeah I think I remember that book, yellow was it?
I have a memory of a picture that could come from that book.
It's armageddon and everything is happening, buildings are coming down in the background and the ground has opened up and people fall in to the huge crack in the ground among them a mother clutching her child as she falls and you can really see the fear in her eyes.
The last time I opened that book was well over twentyfive years ago and I can remember that it used to scare me shitless.
That was good spiritual food for all children, no wonder we never made up any scary stories ourselves we had the watchtower doing it all for us.

THP a-booh
IP: mQQijxvW297GQgoQ
somebodyRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
That's a great write, Farkel! I remember the orange "paradise" book very well. I also remember the terrible pictures in it. It was the book we used for our "family" study. The new things we read every week in it, made me scared for my relatives who were not in the "truth". I remember asking my dad if my grandmother ( who was not a JW) was going to make it through the very soon approaching armageddon. His answer was that no, she wouldn't if it got here tomorrow and telling me not to mourn for her, because I'd have no memory of her ever existing. This was his own mother he was talking about! btw...she's still here today. Being told not to mourn for all those who would not survive armageddon because they deserved to be destroyed hardens the heart. The hardening of the heart is why JWs won't get teared up and cry for all the babies, or anyone else. They've somehow killed their heart, and killed all the "natural" love and feeling that most have for their own familys, and fellowmen in general. the "snotty attitude becomes their only defence.

thanks for the post.

peace,
somebody
IP: hPmho5WLLGKlh1uh
TinaRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Hi farkel,
Great piece! I remember it,well done!
And I remember the Paradise book very well. It sure produced confusion and nightmares.
I remember when my son was very small,Grandma started studying with him using that book........dumb as I was about other JW 'things',I did tell her and show her what chapters I considered 'off limits' for my boy. SUrprisingly,she agreed(seems she found some of those stories scary as well) Thanks and hugs,Tina
IP: 9QFxfLPNuoKIGwtz
think41selfRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Farkel,

Great piece. I too suffered going thru that Paradise book. Then I carried on the abuse with my own children by faithfully reading the "My Book of Bible Stories" with them daily. I will NEVER forget my 3 year old son getting upset and crying when he saw the story about King Solomon, and in the picture, a soldier is holding up a crying baby by it's leg.....with a sword in his other hand I think! Talk about child abuse...my infant son had enough sense to be upset at the sight of the picture and what it implied, whereas I, with a lifetime of Borg training, lamely attempted to explain it to him!

No more for me, thank you very much!

think41self
IP: sgE17wFDGqv+Dc88
philoRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Farkel, that was plastered with your copyright to anyone who's read you.

Any one point you made should be enough for a conscientious JW to revile in horror. Oh well.

A little intelligent examination of their final-solution doctrine really illuminates the degree of thought suppression/dependence necessary among Jehovah's Witnesses. Without that, it would be impossible for them to pitch this stuff from door-door. And yet that is what we all did.

(1) Did we accept it first? Or (2) did we, for some other reason, desire to taut such crap first, and came to believe our own lies later? Mostly it was option (2), in my case.

Was it, "sooner murder an infant in its cot than harbour unacted desires"? (WT:pp666 2002)

I had this discussion with Mormons, a few weeks back, nailed them to the kitchen table, and tickled until they said, "not just Mormons will survive". So of course I asked, "why should I want to be Moronised?" Their answer? (its too good to blurt out, you'll have to wait for it). The Elder, a gangly, big footed boy, obviously going through major physiological changes, called Elder Walsen (wouldn't give his first name), and the other Elder XXX in training (about two years younger) they looked at each other to decide who would field this one. "Well", hand on Book of M, "we believe there are certain exceptional individuals, like Mother Theresa, who will survive even though they aren't Mormons"

"I'm exceptional, thank God for that," says me, "I thought I didn't have a chance!" tollerant smiles from the lads, "So glad I don't have to be a Mormon. And anyway, at thirty-one I'm obviously too old to be an Elder!" They actually laughed at that one. Humanity will out.

philo
IP: ebORTnv7budY0K/l
Had EnoughRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
That's a great summary Farkel of the mindset of the typical JW...so consumed by the 'pat' phrases and answers to these questions.

I too felt the "urge" to get baptised at 13 because of believing I was now "accountable" for myself and that "armageddon was just now at our doorstep" so I had to be baptised to survive. What kind of reasoning is that?!!! How can our "dedication" to doing God's will be acceptable to him if surviving was the motivation, at the direction of the WTS?

Dubs will not generally tell the truth when they are confronted with the question, “Do you believe that ONLY Jehovah’s Witnesses will be saved at Armageddon?” They always come up with some excuse like, “Well, that’s not for us to say. Only Jehovah can read hearts,” even though their literature says exactly the opposite. When a dub makes that excuse and are then further questioned with, “So does that mean you believe that some non-JWs will survive that battle?”, they reply with “Well, that’s not for us to say.” Typical doubletalk.

I do weep for the years I spent spewing that drivel because that was the "pat" answer we were told to give. Did we ever stop to really think about it? No...because "that's what the society says so it must be true".

I weep also for being typical at pushing those nasty pictures and thoughts about innocent babies and children being slaughtered at armageddon, out of my head.

I weep for the time wasted on being so stupid and narrow-minded and shallow as to think a God of love could wipe out the lives of millions just because they don't worship him exactly the way he wants to be worshipped. Why would God wipe out all those babies and their "accountable parents" who are conscientiously worshipping him they way they "think" is right and are good people, leading good lives?

I weep for the time I spent a typical JW, as "somebody" just said, "hardening their hearts" and "having no natural love and feeling" but replacing it with that "snotty attitude in defense"...a defense of the times my conscience was actually pricked by the pictures in the pubs. of destruction at armageddon of the earth opening up and people falling down the deep holes and buildings falling down on them, or of the flood where a mother is holding her crying baby at the top of a mountain with the water rising around them. How sick is that! But, typically, I just put it out of my mind.

And I weep for those still trapped in the mindset of this stupidity.

But I do weep tears of joy at now being able to reason on all of this nonsense and see things clearly and now feel the satisfaction of having answers that "make sense"...so that now I don't have to push an uncomfortable question into the back of my mind so it won't bother me.

Thanks for a well-put-together piece, Farkel

Had Enough
IP: 5xiYr307bioS91x1
TinaRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
((((((((((had enuff))))))))))))))))))
Coming out of the borg is a pretty weepy time. I can't think of anyone who hasn't wept over broken hearts, broken lives,what should have,what could have,the injustices perpetrated.
So many have wept also over the futility of it all,the frustration,the anger. Tears are cleansing..........but know this!
The days of weeping end,and the valor you show thru recovery and taking back your life and mind is indeed,the greatest reward after the tears. Just a small note of encouragement,luv,Tina
IP: 2nJwjwShgDZq1WRZ
nojw86Re: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Farkel that was most interesting piece of real truth there. After reading everyones pain my goes in the same vein. WE are all left with ? which should never have made sense to us in the first place, and wonder how and why it did make sense then. It is not a religion to me but a very cold andwell run organizaton, Just hoping it very soon will feel the pain so many of us went through and are still going through.
IP: WyNN7jalwutrz+to
LokiRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Hi Farkel

As you can see, I'm a newbie so I haven't had chance to read your posts before. That's my loss, your argumentation is gorgeous. It also strikes at what is a key issue for a lot of exJWs.

Like most good little JWs I had my doubts about this one since a child, but just shoved it into the box. You know the box, the one that lurkes in the corner, full of your doubts and questions. Trouble is, that box is only so big, then one day the pressure becomes too great and its contents fly out, leaving you with a huge mess and a lot of intense emotion. Thank you for putting it so well. Keep posting Farkekl.

Loki
Not crying so much for the innocents
IP: Aot894+NiNKyqt4r
DannyBearRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Farkel,

The average jw (former self) really never allow themselves to ruminate, long enough or critical enough, to see the logical conclusions their teachings lead to. Instead they pacify their minds with expressions like 'gods will', 'gods purpose', 'his will', 'jealous god', all of which stop cold the thinking processes.

That is why your writing style is so benefical. You are able to strip the mantras and fall back spin words...before they get a chance to slip into 'nervana' or outright denial. You already used it and threw it back at em.

They may umph and moan, but the words ring true. Who knows, you may get a completely unused brain cell or two, to start firing again on all eight cylinders.

Nice work again.

Danny
IP: 5cOUklf9Rhbtnxxn
hawkawRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Farkel or anyone else,

I am having a slight brain cramp.

How does the GB's 1994(5?) change in the sheep and goats doctrine of Matt. 25 affect what you are saying?

hawk
IP: CDKNgyKpOE4bLzhQ
somebodyRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
sheesh...this thread has made me cry for the babies, and for all of us! thanks again Farkel and thank everyone who contributed. Had Enough, we all weep with you! Anyone got any kleenex?


hi,hawkaw

I'm not sure what you're asking. what is the "doctrine" about the sheep and goats that the GB teach, or changed in 94/95? If you state the doctrine. I'll add my opinion. ( assuming you mean the whole chapter 25 of Matthew. I don't see that as having anything to do with babies, or any other group of innocent people that Farkel was asking JW's to explain )
IP: 5F/T7dCSeWEDCPU7
Had EnoughRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Hi Tina:

So many have wept also over the futility of it all,the frustration,the anger
That's one of the strongest drawing cards that brings so many of us here and keeps us here....knowing that we are not alone in what we experienced, have felt and are now feeling...just knowing that others understand. That's what makes the tears flow and then helps to dry them up too.

Facing reality is tough for all of us but the helping of each other that I see here, is more than I've seen in my lifetime with the borg. So thanks for your kind words to me and all the others you encourage too.

I now have many more happy days than I've had for a long while...and I know I'll have many more when I see what so many others have gone through and are getting stronger. Reading posts like Farkel's is tough for us new ones and for many longtime outers too, but it's so needed to cut through the sludge in our minds that's been caused by the time we've spent in "robot mode".

Hey somebody:
Maybe we've all wept enough for today. I'm all out of kleenex. Ahhhh...feel better now. At least I think we're alert enough now not to get lulled into being "stepford wives" again.

luv to you guys....Had Enough
IP: 5xiYr307bioS91x1
MaximusRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
:: I was forced to study that masterpiece of child-abuse known as “From Paradise to Paradise Regained”

Right on, Farkel, as usual--although that pinches.

For the record, Nathan Knorr wanted to release a book with illustrations (he had an attractive, talented new in-house female artist) for the huge double assembly in Yankee Stadium and the Polo Grounds, along with other literature--a "release" a day. It was to be a book for the Far East in particular, with no negative doctrines like Trinity to be discussed, analyzed and then "right" teaching presented. But the President vacillated and could not really make up his mind. His right-hand man Freddy Franz was, of course, too busy with the other publications, the Daniel book and the NW translation volume, and tepid to the project.

The then-editor of the publications told NHK that time did not permit what it would take to get the book through the factory, including writing the MS. Knorr the businessman decided to divvy up the book between several different writers! (If you have four writers, you can do it in 25% of the time, right? Groan.) Not all got the message. Some thought it was for children. If you have a copy, glance through it and you will see the differences in style, not to mention approach. Cf. the fire and damnation from heaven stuff.

When the final product was read from Chapter 1 onward in MS form, it was an obvious mess which a few thoughtful ones saw clearly. It was too late to do anything about it--a rewrite impossible; Colin gritted his teeth, and the book was mindlessly used as a children's book, despite "official" comments noting that was not its purpose.

It sure did influence young minds. And for many persons I've talked to over the decades, it elicited many nightmares.

Take-home thought to ponder: was this "food at the proper time"? A product from God himself? The r&f have this vision of saintly men praying and the holy spirit prompting their pens--the faithful slave dispensing food via the anointed-remnant GB. Hardly.

I enjoyed the thoughtfulness of your post, Farkel. The cauldron of pain has produced in you a unique combination of head and heart. You've helped so many.

Maximus
IP: Pd6rCPTowJcbf8To
hawkawRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Hi somebody,

I am going stupid - I thought the GB changed the sheep & goat stuff. I thought if you were on the outside you are now "goatlike" and not a goat? I am sorry for being stupid but.. I thought this meant that the GB was saying they were not sure who Jesus was going to choose as sheep and goats but if you belong to the WT you would definitely be a sheep. So my question is if the GB ain't so sure who is a goat then does this mean the GB is also saying they don't know who is going to bite it during the big A?

hawk
IP: IuFDK+mfdMLXMTYp
FarkelRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?
Francoise,

: You don't have to do anything to copyright your stuff, at least not with any gummint agency. Copyright automatically inheres in the fact that you wrote something.

I don't want to copyright anything I've written. I want it freely distributed, freely copied and freely available. I might be a little pissed if someone changed some of my stuff so that my original intent was altered, though. I'm not in this for glory or money. AlanF who has spent massive amounts of time doing incredibile research and written stuff that could easily be coalesced into a book feels the same way.

Given that, one must question why the mighty Watchtower Printing Corporation INSISTS on a copyright for EVERYTHING they produce. "You received free, give free." - Jesus. Not in WatchtowerWorld.

The irony of that is that they hold copyrights on shit that was outdated months or a few years after they published that crap. Keep in mind that when they publish crap, they publish crap in the hundreds of millions of copies and distribute that crap in 100+ countries. Quantity and crap are not mutually exclusive, by the way. A hundred million pieces of crap is still crap. One piece of solid stuff is still solid stuff. WT goes for volume. I'll do my stuff one-at-a-time. I have no "donation arrangement," either. I think freely. I speak freely. I give freely. I expect no reward other than to stimulate folks to think about stuff.


Farkel
IP: Sg2zhoK7pLJWVyaz
Big TexRe: Who Will Cry For the Babies?

Farkel

Powerful and moving essay.  You reach out and force the reader to stare intensely at some very uncomfortable sights.  Certainly the idea of God destroying helpless babies, mentally challenged people and other innocents does not jibe with the God of love as taught by Christ.  You bring out points that most JWs do not allow themselves to consider deeply else they would begin to ask questions.  Truly, none so blind as those who will not see. 

I'm embarrassed to admit that I had no idea the writing and editing at Bethel, even back in the "good old days" were so half-assed.  I saw myself as one of those who pictured the GB and writing staff as being a bit more, shall we say, spiritual.  How many Witnesses today would question the organization if they knew that factors in the "food at the proper time" included a shapley female illustrator?  Did God commission 4 different men to take down the 10 Commandments because he had an artificial deadline?  What a stupid idiotic ass I am to have been sucked in by these people! 

 
IP: OH7gZUxy/3FN25Qy