(post 72578) in Friends

Member	Post

The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Moxy on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by crossroads on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Moxy on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by wannahelp on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by kes152 on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by unclebruce on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Camay on

At the risk of having everyone on the Board go... by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by TR on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by unclebruce on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Farkel Re: The "Tree" of WHAT?
Greetings Shelby,
: My Father did not want His children to know good... AND bad. Indeed, they knew GOOD... and good was all they knew. He lovingly did not want them to also know BAD.
Explain to we dummies how one can know "good" without any frame of reference whatsoever about what "bad" means. There is no such thing as "good" without a thing called "bad." It simply cannot exist.
Therefore, God created BOTH good and bad. Adam and Eve could NEVER understand GOOD without understanding what BAD means.
Your argument collapses.
I still love you, though. You just need to find some better "voices" to listen to, that's all. Tune to the "voice" of "reason." That would be a good start, I think. :)
Farkel
IP: XQb8D4EpA1urV6AW

Your 'point' is great! May I ask you, though... by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by unclebruce on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by crossroads on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by unclebruce on

Scratching head... by AGuest on

Excuse me, Unk, but.... by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by crossroads on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by unclebruce on

Tree of ... by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by crossroads on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by crossroads on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by unclebruce on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by THE GLADIATOR on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by kes152 on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Rex B13 on

The "Tree" of WHAT? by AlanF on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Rex B13 on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by THE GLADIATOR on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by LadyBug on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by crossroads on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Derrick on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by LovesDubs on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by joelbear on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by LadyBug on

Still don't have a clue, do you? by Rex B13 on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Siddhashunyata on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by dedalus on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Faithful2Jah on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by dedalus on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by waiting on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by dedalus on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by thinker on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by GWEEDO on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by GWEEDO on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by thinker on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by AGuest on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by GWEEDO on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Faithful2Jah on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by aChristian on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Farkel on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by rocketman on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by stevenyc on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by stillajwexelder on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Seeker4 on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by toreador on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by Mr Ben on

Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? by parakeet on

Farkel	Re: The "Tree" of WHAT?
	Greetings Shelby, : My Father did not want His children to know good... AND bad. Indeed, they knew GOOD... and good was all they knew. He lovingly did not want them to also know BAD. Explain to we dummies how one can know "good" without any frame of reference whatsoever about what "bad" means. There is no such thing as "good" without a thing called "bad." It simply cannot exist. Therefore, God created BOTH good and bad. Adam and Eve could NEVER understand GOOD without understanding what BAD means. Your argument collapses. I still love you, though. You just need to find some better "voices" to listen to, that's all. Tune to the "voice" of "reason." That would be a good start, I think. :) Farkel
IP: XQb8D4EpA1urV6AW