yeah, i know farkel. i just thought it was a pithy observation about old habits. but on another level, it actually does bother me to have to apply all this analytical power to the genesis story for the reason that it really is a very, very nice piece of literature. the original work by J, once seperated from later redactions and editions, is a very moving, memorable story with lots of subtle ironies. its a shame what fundamentlism has done to it.mox
| Member | Post |
|---|
The "Tree" of WHAT?
by
Farkel
on
Re: The "Tree" of WHAT?
by
Moxy
on
| Moxy | Re: The "Tree" of WHAT? | |
| IP: nxxGIPeETxS4Zpm0 | ||
Re: The "Tree" of WHAT?
by
Camay
on
Re: The "Tree" of WHAT?
by
TR
on
Scratching head...
by
AGuest
on
Tree of ...
by
AGuest
on
The "Tree" of WHAT?
by
AlanF
on