MemberPost
The coming "disassociations" by Elsewhere on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by No Apologies on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Country Girl on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Simon on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JH on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by reubenfine on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by benext on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Xander on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Gopher on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on

JTRe: The coming "disassociations"
I'm curious how the average JW will perceive this and respond to it.

the way they always do, NEW LIGHT AND JAH IS CLEANING out his house, which means we are DEEP IN THE LAST DAYS -

 

don't miss any meeting , and turn in your time

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

 

this issue was discussed at length right after the wt shifted blood from a DFing offense to a DAing offense

 

 

this is why i keep telling folks don't be writing no DAing letter to wt  - any action taken should be taken from thier end-

 

the entire concept of DAing is the greatest invention to come out of the Legal Dept in years

 

being that blood is such a hot issue legal saw the need to remove any action on the part of their reps the elders as taking an aggressive stand against someone who took blood

 

previously a person could claim if i take blood they will haul me into a judical meeeting no camera, no recorder, no lawyer, etc and then they will grill me to death - with that the normal way it was handled

 

it could be argued in court in some countries that a jw refused blood due to fear and intimidation from the church

it has become so important to legal desk that the writing and service dept impliment new dogma and procedures that dont give the APPEARANCE the the indiviual jw is being corieced or force to comply due to being hauled in to the body of elder

 

as i have tried time and time again to explain the concept behind DAing- so many former jw unbeknown to them too many times ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT THE WT WANTS

 even on ones way out of wt they still BOW BEFORE THE SERVICE DEPT ALTER ON THE WAY OUT

 

by writing a personal letter it FREES WT OF LIABLE ISSUE

 for if the day everycomes when wt can be sued for it's goofy dogmas the hell if i'm going to sign avway my Civil Rights to get money ,esp since they pimped all of us

but at any rate when this thread was discussed we talked about the clear direction that the service dept is going

 BY  moving more issues from a DFing offense to a DA offense they can get the same results without the same legal issues

and this very thing of asking inactive ones DO YOU WANT HELP

 

I still see the following or a variation of it taking place:

for those of you who were around in sept 81 when we had the DFing Articles where the wt went into 3 study articles on DFing

 

i see the same again - another powerful articles

 WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON JEHOVAH'S OR SATAN

 

 and within this article they will use the words of peter to say that a good jw will not be INACTIVE-

AND that we need to decide whatside we are on

in the study article they will go to great lengths to show that jw has always tried to help those who have fallen,but we MUST RESPOND TO THAT HELP and  ANYONE WHO REJECTS it is turning their back on jah who is reaching out to them and should be viewed as no longer a jw for we don't  REJECT ANY OF JAH ARRANGEMENTS AND THIS IS HIS ARRANGEMENT

 

 and what form does that help take place today--the older men--  and how do you respond-

then they will say the elders will be receiving special instructions on how to  REACH OUT TO SUCH ONES -

 

at this point the service dept will inform the elders to  complie a list of all inactive

 

when i was the SEC we had 127 publisher and in the upstairs storage we had a box of old cards of over 200 cards of deceased, folks who moved ,but mainly inactive ones living right in the terrirtory who were never DFed or any thing

 

i can see them breaking it down by bookstudies and calling on everyone and asking them the following

 

 DO YOU WANT HELP and if the answer is yes a publisher will be assigned to you to get you back in the swing of things, the elders will be able to allow TIME TO BE COUNTED BY ANYONE, not just the pioneers, showing just how serious jw is about reaching out one last time before the  DOOR OF THE SYMBOLIC ARK IS SHUT

 If the person says NO THANKS they will be told that they are rejecting jah arrangement and therefore rejecting jah himself and  WE CAN ONLY CONCLUDE THAT YOU NO LONGER WANT TO BE KNOWN AS A JW

 

 we will inform the congo of your decision not to accept the help that jah is offering 

AND THEY  will be DAed and the elders will not even have to lift a finger to do it

 

and i firmly believe that we will see less and less DFing offenses as they are shifted to the DAing list instead

 

and based on what we are reading here from folks still attending we can clearly see things shaping up in that direction

 

 
IP: Ep2UcOCGs130hOBg

Re: The coming "disassociations" by Reborn2002 on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by freedom96 on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Big Tex on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by blondie on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Xander on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Big Tex on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Reborn2002 on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by blondie on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by metatron on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Elsewhere on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Reborn2002 on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Xander on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by wednesday on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by bluesapphire on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Scully on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Pleasuredome on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by GeddyLee on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by BluesBrother on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Marcos on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Undecided on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Jourles on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by ThiChi on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by metatron on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by jazbug on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by ThiChi on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JH on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Wolfy on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Mary on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by waiting on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Navigator on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Sabine on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Reborn2002 on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Makena1 on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by JT on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by jimbob on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by hybridous on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Deist on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Stan Conroy on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Beans on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Makena1 on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Sabine on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by GeddyLee on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Thechickennest on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by No Apologies on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by wednesday on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Stan Conroy on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by bigboi on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by LDH on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by GeddyLee on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by justhuman on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Stan Conroy on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by GeddyLee on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by titomunoz on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Stan Conroy on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by NoMoreJW on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Pork Chop on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Scully on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Pork Chop on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Scully on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Elsewhere on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Big Tex on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Scully on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Big Tex on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by Scully on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by jesussaves on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by No Apologies on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by SheilaM on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by NewYork44M on
Re: The coming "disassociations" by line6guy on