Today's Watchtower Study (Feb 15, p17) seeks to reassure JWs that Jehovah will take action against all opposers to the WTBTS.It states: "Unscrupulous men slander Jehovah's Witnesses, branding them a 'dangerous cult'. God is aware of their actions-and these will not go unpunished."(para 11)Apparently these opposers will meet a fate similar to that described in Zephaniah. How the connection is drawn is not said, but the punishment is gory if the article is to be believed.Also, it's claimed that the opposition is the result of the influence of manipulative clergymen (para 11). Further details are not given.Jehovah's witnesses R&F are exhorted to remain faithful and to 'seek Jehovah'. How? Paragraph 5 states that "'Seeking Jehovah' today involves developing and maintaining a warm personal relationship with him in association with his earthly organisation."A similar point is repeated in paragraph 19 which states; "...by displaying a meek, submissive attitude toward God and his arrangements for salvation?"This does not seem to 'gel' with Jesus, words recorded at John 17:3"This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge (or, "knowing you") the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ."The question may be asked "If salvation resulted from knowing Jehovah and Jesus in the first century and this was the good news or gospel, and nothing else, why is that not sufficient in the 21st century?"It is not explained with scripture references in the Watchtower article how the organisation is linked to salvation.Also, not explained, are the "arrangements for salvation" that it's necessary to show submission to. Could this be 'code' for the organisation again?Did anyone else come away from today's Watchtower Study feeling that the scriptural backing for these statements was lacking?Wishing they would be honest,Ozzie (of the un non-anointed class)
| Member | Post | Viewed: times |
|---|
| ozziepost | Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
| IP: zbj/D4cHMqbaqudi | ||
| patio34 | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
I would love to see the reactions to these questions during a WT study at the Kingdom Hall!Good post--it helps to think past the paragraphs. I haven't read a magazine in quite a while as I don't trust myself to read with critical thinking skills. It will come with time, i hope.Btw, did you know that technically it was incorrect to capitalize the pronoun "i"? But when copyists handwrote literature, it was too easy to lose the "i" due to its size, therefore, it was capitalized.Patio (of the word-trivia class) | ||
| IP: 1nH+1Vr6F/5vO7Pm | ||
| zev | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
patio34 said: Btw, did you know that technically it was incorrect to capitalize the pronoun "i"? But when copyists handwrote literature, it was too easy to lose the "i" due to its size, therefore, it was capitalized. good. now i dont have to keep correcting all those "i"'s i dont capitolize. nice post ozzie.....off i go to the meeting 2 sleep it off.....__ zev Sitting on the Wrong Side of the Fence Class ![]() | ||
| IP: oV50+4Y6Bbb1n5C5 | ||
| Francois | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Well, there certainly is a lot of difference between the two following statements: 1) This means everlasting life, taking in knowledge [about God]...; and 2) This means everlasting life, knowing God...Knowing someone is quite different from knowing ABOUT them. And here is just where JWs and the WTB&TS miss the point. Deliberately. If you can know God as a direct phenomena, why do you need even one other person, much less an entire organization, to know him?This point is further clarified, as is the WTB&TS evil motivation, in the following mistranslation, also deliberate: "The kingdom of heaven is in your midst..." vs. "The kingdom of heaven is within you..."If the kingdom of heaven is within you, then it is within your direct, unaided grasp to know this "kingdom" as a direct spiritual experience. Of course, the WTB&TS does not want you to have this understanding, because if God can be directly known, of what use is their damnable organization? Thus, they have deliberately mis-translated this (and many other) scriptures. God does indeed know of this, and I wouldn't want to be in the shoes of any of the governing body, nor of their accomplices when they are called on to answer for the load they place on their followers, the weight of which they are unwilling to even budge with the tips of their fingers.As for the question as to whether the WTB&TS is a cult: If it walks, looks, quacks, and swims like a duck...well, you know. Let's look at the definition of what constitutes a cult and see if the JWs meet the definition.There is an infallible leader or set of leaders. Check. The WTB&TS claims to speak for God, and their pronouncements in their publications are to be regarded as the very word of God.The cult holds out an extravagant hope. Check. Life everlasting on a paradise earth. Soon. Questioning, doubt, and dissent in a cult are discouraged or even punished. Check. How many articles have you seen in the WT, Awake, etc., discouraging in the most strident terms, independent thinking?The cult is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself and its leaders. Check. JWs are God's chosen people, and the governing body is the "only channel of communication" that God is using today.The cult has a polarized us- versus-them mentality, which causes conflict or isolation with the wider society. Check. It's the JWs against everybody else, all of whom are caught up in the "world empire of false religion."The cult adopts special terminology designed to give its members a feeling of settled, advanced insight when use of its meaningless phrases actually stifle real knowledge - subsituting sloganeering for thinking. Check. "World emplire of false religion," and "Babylon the Great," for instance.The cult's leaders are not accountable to any authorities. Check. The WTB&TS does not file even the "informational" income tax return, for example. Its finances are totally secret. Where DOES all that money go? Can YOU think of any authority the JWs are subservient to? (Don't say Jehovah. We know what a joke that is.)The cult teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify means that members would have considered unethical before joining the group. Check. The WTB&TS has said in print that lying is an acceptable technique in their "spiritual war."The leadership induces guilt feelings in members in order to control them. Check. I remember entire study articles in the WT dealing with how great guilt feelings are, zeroing in especially on one of the Psalms in which David states that his "sin is constantly before" him, and holding that up as an example for good little JWs.Members' subservience to the cult causes them to cut ties with family and friends, and to give up personal goals and activities that were of interest before joining the group. Check. No illumination here is even needed.Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group. Check.Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members. Check.I could go on further with this, but why bother? The organization of Jehovah's Witnesses is, and has always been, a cult. It is also a false prophet. Remember Deut. 18:20-22 and its comments about false prophets and what would happen to them?In the WTB&TS publication "Jehovah's Witnesses In the Divine Purpose" the organization charges mainstream religions with revealing how they are false prophets and constitute a false religion by the fact that they will not come out and meet "Judge" Rutherford and others in debate in various halls that he had hired. Don't believe it? Get yourself a copy of the referenced publication if you can find one they haven't collected and destroyed. You will find the organization crowing very loudly about how this lack of willingness to debate proves how false they are.I issue this challenge to the governing body of Jehovah's Witnesses: I will debate any aspect of your so-called religion with any one or all of you at any reasonable time, at any reasonable place, in the same spirit as disclosed in your publication "Jehovah's Witnesses in the Divine Purpose." You will be free to bring any publication, any "expert" of your choosing, and I will be able to do the same. I suggest a classical debate upon the proposition "Jehovah's Witnesses Constitute a Religious Cult." I will, of course, debate the affirmative.I publicly accuse you of being false prophets, unworthy of notice, much less fear.I publicly accuse you of constituting a false religion. And of operating nothing more than a publishing and real estate empire.I publicly accuse you of the ruination of hundreds of thousands of lives and, in fact, of dealing to death - by your teachings - thousands of lives that did not have to be sacrificed to your illicit teachings.I publicly accuse you of being what I have here proven: that you are a cult, not unlike any other two-bit cult to be found in their thousands on this planet.And I publicly accuse you of being cowards who will NOT on any account accept this challenge. Proving for all to see that you are no more supported by God - much less that you are God's spokesmen - than I am the Virgin Mary.You can accept this challenge at any time during the next 90 days from today, or until July 1, 2001 by posting your response as a new topic on this bulletin board. We all know you don't have the spine to do it. And do you remember the contest between the priests of Jehovah and the priests of Baal? The priests of Baal couldn't make the fire come down and ignite the bonfire, but by their God, they did have the guts to show up. You won't.Standing By.Francoise | ||
| IP: xKX30HS/QzfwxpNf | ||
| happytobefree | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
That Watchtower lesson being presented this Sunday go hand and hand with this being the Sunday of the Special Talk. I received a phone call this morning from my father inviting me to try and attend. I just pray that all of the nonJW who visit the KH today, do not get taken in by this garbage.Happy to be Free (Me) | ||
| IP: EXYGn+GdFfSB0NcX | ||
| Had Enough | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Good point Ozzie:<<"It is not explained with scripture references in the Watchtower article how the organisation is linked to salvation.">>I so often wish now that I had thought about these things years ago. My dearest friend and I have discussed this kind of thought many times lately saying 'where does it say that in the Bible?'Before I began thinking more deeply (dangerous thing to do??) I fell into the category so many still active, go-by-the-book, totally pro-organization witnesses are in now. The WTS says it so..OK, they believe it. Or if they don't believe it they feel guilty that there's either something wrong with their spirituality or they'll wait for Jehovah to fix it. How long will they keep their blinders on? These points we question may not seem like 'life and death' questions, but its statements like those in today's WT that keep many witnesses tied to org. and keep them following all the rules and regulations no matter how hurtful they are.Hopefully more and more will open their eyes and seek the real 'truth'. Patio34: Old habits die hard...I still capitalize my "I"s...Zev: I feel for the position you're in..I've read several of your posts and I understand what it's like to be caught between that rock and a hard place, and how you feel that for now you have no choice but to sit through the meetings for family sake. For now I guess there's no other real option...at least here you're not alone.Had Enough | ||
| IP: 5xiYr307bioS91x1 | ||
| Englishman | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Ozzie,This is excellent news!On Friday I had a long talk with our Dub-in-the-pub, specifically about the fact that there is no scriptural reference to "Jehovahs earthly organisation".Tonight we are having a big birthday celebration and and my dub pal is arriving at the pub straight from the WT study.This is going to be highly entertaining.Englishman. | ||
| IP: s7jJjUtZsOQSON+8 | ||
| stephenw20 | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Francoise,You woudl have abattle with an unarmed man or group........shame on you...be kind to those less fortuante than you.....but really....why would they debate you...they just want to be left alone.... counting the beans and the hours and the magazines...chcching! S | ||
| IP: DN6vJSOd03h9WiR+ | ||
| Francois | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
S"You woudl have abattle with an unarmed man or group........shame on you...be kind to those less fortuante than you....."???What do you mean?Of course they want to count their money. But you don't have to promulgate a system of beliefs that destroy families, and kills people in order for you to run your little scam.And of course they don't want to debate. Me nor anyone else. They know they would loose their ass in an open debate. | ||
| IP: xKX30HS/QzfwxpNf | ||
| ozziepost | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Herr Englander,Be sure to tell us how the birthday party in a pub went. This is getting exciting!Make mine a Killarney, thanks, mate.Ozzie | ||
| IP: l+KouWsej0TG2APo | ||
| stephenw20 | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Francoise, I mean, the LEADERS are so removed form the WRITINGS they havent a clue...yes all they have done is wrong to mankindyou do have to have people give you their money as donations if you dont want to work and get it all tax free........ so this is their way...I am not saying it is right........... far from itof course they would loose and lose their ass ...it would be like Ronald Reagen tryiing to remember something....MOMMY! | ||
| IP: DN6vJSOd03h9WiR+ | ||
| Gozz | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Francoise, it is remarkable, and commendable, that your challenge is to the Governing Body.Ozzie, your comments per thr study articles on Zephaniah are home here. Those articles are very disturbing. | ||
| IP: vquR5pJB+FLLAAqA | ||
| AMNESIAN | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Ozzie wrote:>>Today's Watchtower Study (Feb 15, p17):>>Jehovah's witnesses R&F are exhorted to remain faithful and to 'seek Jehovah'. How? Paragraph 5 states that "'Seeking Jehovah' today involves developing and maintaining a warm personal relationship with him in association with his earthly organisation.">>A similar point is repeated in paragraph 19 which states; "...by displaying a meek, submissive attitude toward God and his arrangements for salvation?">>This does not seem to 'gel' with Jesus, words recorded at John 17:3"This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge (or, "knowing you") the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ."Nor does it gel with the very theme text on which this study article claims to be based. Zephaniah's prophecy states quite simply the requirements for salvation: "Seek Jehovah...Seek righteousness, seek meekness." Period.>>The question may be asked "If salvation resulted from knowing Jehovah and Jesus in the first century and this was the good news or gospel, and nothing else, why is that not sufficient in the 21st century?"And conversely, the question may be asked "If salvation in the first century resulted from a warm personal relationship with Jehovah *'in association with his earthly organization'* and this was the good news Jesus and his disciples preached, why was there never any such mention anywhere in any of the gospels for those of us seeking in this 21st century?">>It is not explained with scripture references in the Watchtower article how the organisation is linked to salvation.Not in this article nor any other that I've ever read. Salvation's link to association with the organization is always adamantly asserted with never an unambiguous scriptural citation ever provided in support.>>Also, not explained, are the "arrangements for salvation" that it's necessary to show submission to. Could this be 'code' for the organisation again?I hilite my mag in two different colors. Light green for that with which I have no problem, i.e., am satisfied with the scriptural support. I use my flourescent yellow for the fishy stuff and that which is pure moonshine. The "in association..." and the "arrangements for salvation" are two insertions I hilited bright yellow in this article. They were just such glaringly spurious assertions.>>Did anyone else come away from today's Watchtower Study feeling that the scriptural backing for these statements was lacking?I certainly did. I am very offended by the manipulation and tampering the WBTS shamelessly and arrogantly passes off as "food at the proper time."I've got editorial notations all over the margins of this article. I found myself, during the meeting, looking around, appalled, at so many trusting and decent and humble folks in the KH grazing through the WS Q&A, offering up their scripted "fruit of the lips" seemingly semi-conscious after the "special" talk. I did manage to chuckle once, though, at one poor young brother. He mouths the organization-speak so effortlessly, and unthinkingly, that he submitted the irreconcilable pairing of two of our favorites when he responded to one question, toward the end of the lesson (presumably to get his one "comment" in before the bell rang) with "Jehovah's day will come quickly, in His own due time."While on the subject, I had a coupla other problem with this article in addition to the two already referenced by ozzie.Under the sub-heading "Woe to Insolent Wrongdoers", par 16 states: "Says Zephaniah 3:1,2: 'Woe to her that is rebelling and polluting herself, the oppressive city! She did not listen to a voice; she did not accept discipline. In Jehovah she did not trust. To her God she did not draw near.' How tragic that Jehovah's efforts to discipline *his people* went unheeded!"The article is clear, at this point, that this denunciation is directed at Jehovah's own people, Judah and Jerusalem. The paragraph continues:"Deplorable, indeed, was the ruthlessness of the princes, nobles, and judges. Zephaniah decried the shamelessness of the religious leaders, saying: 'Her prophets were insolent, were men of treachery. Her priests themselves profaned what was holy; they did violence to the law.'" (Zephaniah 1:3,4)Strong condemnation of God's own people, no? The question for par 16, though, amazingly, asks "What did Zephaniah's prophecy say about Judah's princes and religious leaders, and why do these words fit *Christendom*?"!The answer?Par 16 continues: "How well those words fit the situation of Christendom's prophets and priests today!"So who exactly represent God's "own" people today? According to this Watchtower, it is Christendom who has rejected Jehovah's efforts to discipline "her" and, thereby, fullfill Zephaniah's prophetic judgements today. But, if that's true, that would make "her" God's "own people" today. But we know that JWs, of whom I am one, claim that they are God's "own people." How can we claim to be God's only "own people" when the scriptures promise and describe wonderful blessings in store for the faithful but avoid applying the denunciations that are to come to God's "own people"? They are trying to have it both ways, as usual.One last take on yesterday's WS. Par 17 states:"Jehovah considerately warned his ancient people regarding the action he was about to take. He sent his servants the prophets---Zephaniah and Jeremiah, among others---to urge the people to repent."Zephaniah and Jeremiah and the other prophets warned Jehovah's own people, right? And if JWs represent Jehovah's people today, why does par 17 make the following modern-day application?"A similar waringing is being sounded at this time. If you are a publisher of the good news, you are having a share in this *warning work*. Keep on declaring the good news without letup! Whether the people listen or not, your ministry is a success from God's standpoint as long as you are carrying it out faithfully; you have no need for shame as you do God's work with zeal."How can the preaching work being done today by JWs toward all non-JWs parallel the warning work Jehovah's ancient prophets did among and toward his own worshippers and religious leaders?>>Wishing they would be honest,As do so many of us who are still, for various reason, trapped between the lie and the half-truth and not "encouraged" by it.Thanks for your post. Obviously, it resonated. | ||
| IP: OTWTC9FmkJv7u8KA | ||
| Prisca | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Excellent points, AMNESIAN! When I was still a Witness I could see there were many things stated in the Watchtower that were clearly stretched by the writers to apply some scriptures to themselves, yet then applied other scriptures to whatever they saw fit, regardless of the context! And like you, I wasn't encouraged by it, I was confused and DIScouraged The good thing was though, that I started to read the Bible more, and saw what it REALLY said. | ||
| IP: bXHh9WGc5QiLvgtm | ||
| ozziepost | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Thanks very much Amnesian for the excellent point "Zephaniah and Jeremiah and the other prophets warned Jehovah's own people, right? And if JWs represent Jehovah's people today, why does par 17 make the following modern-day application?"Very apropos. Thanks for pointing it out.BTW I think this may have been your very first post here. Welcome aboard! We're happy to have you here and look forward to reading many more insights. I'll be looking out for them.Cheers,Ozzie | ||
| IP: WjkVim5lqLYcgRMq | ||
| bjc2012 | Re: Seek Jehovah or His Organisation? | |
Ozziepost,They wrote:"Jehovah's witnesses R&F are exhorted to remain faithful and to 'seek Jehovah'. How? Paragraph 5 states that "'Seeking Jehovah' today involves developing and maintaining a warm personal relationship with him in association with his earthly organisation."So, now we know who our mediator is.Now we | ||
| IP: nPolxoFTVcWX43SJ | ||
nice post ozzie.....off i go to the meeting 2 sleep it off.....
The good thing was though, that I started to read the Bible more, and saw what it REALLY said.