MemberPostViewed: times
ozziepostRestrictions


There is a practice among JWs of applying restrictions to individual members. It forms part of the judicial process and, although having no scriptural basis, is applied automatically to erring ones who are judged to be repentant.

So, for a period of time, usually up to 12 months, the individual is not allowed to share in commenting at meetings, offering public prayer, appearing on the platform in congregation meetings, or in ‘serving’ as an Auxiliary Pioneer.

As with any man-made law, difficulties arise from this practice. Although no announcement has been made to the congregation, individual congregation members can have their curiosity aroused.

For example, take the real-life situation where a sole parent has been placed ‘on restrictions’ by a judicial committee. Whilst attending the group book study, others in the group begin to wonder why the restricted person is not commenting. After all, previously, he/she was in the custom of having a full share but now, even in a small group of no more than 15, he/she does not speak at all. The parent’s child also raises questions. What follows on from this is a problem of lack of confidentiality. Is this really what a “loving organisation” would do?

Another area of restrictions is in the area of a disfellowshipped person attending meetings in the Kingdom Hall.

A DF person is not entitled to receive a copy of ‘Kingdom Ministry’. If there is a believing spouse, they cannot share the KM, for that would be fellowshipping spiritually on the part of the JW spouse! So the DF person is expected to attend the Service Meetings (as a sign of repentance) yet not be able to follow the meeting outline in the Kingdom Ministry, nor be able, if they wished, to prepare for the meeting.

Elders reading this may like to examine their own hearts over restrictions for they must have taken part in applying these regulations. Background information is found in “Pay Attention to Yourselves and to All the Flock”(ks91) page 130, and “Our Kingdom Ministry” February 1987 page 8.

Does it make sense? Is it scriptural? Is it loving? Some elders are troubled by these things but comply out of loyalty. But to what or whom? Is the question. To the organisation or to Jehovah God?

Ozzie
IP: nVUqxhLt9yszaGCK
ICHINGRe: Restrictions
ozzie - yea it's scriptural - refer to the eg. of the Pharisees

I-CHING
IP: 4JdAKEKGXpN5OSp2
ozziepostRe: Restrictions
I agree I-Ching that it's Pharisaical in application, but I don't think even they hade developed the regulation of restrictions!

Ozzie
IP: nVUqxhLt9yszaGCK
GopherRe: Restrictions
Ozzie, great topic!

What you have outlined shows that 'private reproof' does not really exist. Goodness, even before the elders meet with you word gets around. I mean, if the "friends" see 2 or 3 brothers going with you into that dreaded conference room, how long before people talk about you? 15 seconds or so?

That part about DF'd people not having the 'privilege' to read the KM was one thing that really made me re-evaluate, was all this humiliation worth it? I guess this is some sort of TEST. If you can withstand all the humiliation for some extended time period, then you can rejoin the group with all its 'privileges'.

Of course, none of these practices will change. It would be too loving!

Gopher, who only learns about the recent KM's from this Discussion Board
IP: Wb0Uj9frrLZ1LeQs
ICHINGRe: Restrictions
ozzie - you may be right - more specifically what i meant was - making stuff up and adding it to the scriptural mix - as if the made up stuff WAS scripture - it's hard fro me to get worked up over this - the wtbts is so right it's wrong

I-CHING
IP: 4JdAKEKGXpN5OSp2
buscarRe: Restrictions
Lets face it folks there is no LOVE at the Kingdoom Hall. One elder with his lies can turn the whole Hall against you and you have no redress. You are told "we'll have to leave it in Jehovahs hand"

Better be prepared for a long wait.

All these restrictions, marking, dfing, are PUNISHMENT for daring to speak up against the elders. Love has nothing to do it. How are you loving your neighbour as yourself when you treat them like sh!t?

Boy am I glad I escaped from that phycological prison.
IP: bN89SehcYzsowCaP
CarmelRe: Restrictions
Great topic! It reminds me of my experiance first as a student, then a teacher and finally as a parent and community member with public schools. Whenever a student skips school, and there are some very interesting reasons and excuses for doing so, what does the school policy require? Well of course, we have to expell said offender with a minimum three day suspension! Our collective egos are offended that someone thinks some other way of spending the day is superior to being in the hallowed halls of our "school". Rarely does the system stop to think about the stupidity of this approach. Why not take a look at why Johnny is motivated to take a day and do whatever he choses as an alternative? Anyway, in all my years, I have only had one highschool administrator or school board member agree with me that the suspension practice is counter-productive. He was a super who had the best educational philosophy of any educator I have met. He also reduced the amount of class cutting by 80 percent.

I say let the shunning continue, it's a self-limiting sociopathic disease.

carmel
IP: S56W3s+SjnV+eXwm
EnglishmanRe: Restrictions
Ozzie,

These restrictions used to be called probation.

As one who found himself "on probation" (for loving my neighbour too well) I had every so called privilege removed including opening and closing prayers.

Nobody told the WT study conductor of my lowly state, so I was frequently called upon to do the honours. I had a pal who used to jump in on my behalf when this happened, and guess what? Nobody EVER noticed the substitution!

Englishman.

Edited by - Englishman on 24 March 2001 7:9:56
IP: PsXXzgAyreWJyg54
ozziepostRe: Restrictions
English,

I can remember those 'good old days' when we an 'on probation' class. Ah, those were the days!

An interesting comment on re-instatement is found in the October 1, 1998 isuue of The Watchtower. On page 17, paragraph 16 it states of those who are reinstated to the congregation: "Like the prodigal's father, jehovah treats with dignity those who do return, accepting them back as full-fledged members of the family."

At the time of this Watchtower, I asked several elders and C.O. to comment on that. Notice it said that re-instated ones are 'full-fledged' members. I asked how could they be 'full-fledged' when they are on restrictions? Not one elder/C.O. could answer the question. The best I got was that if we wait on Jehovah, it appears as though there is going to be a change in procedure! Well, that was nearly 3 years ago, so I guess the waiting is over!

I guess it's a demonstartion of the truism that the more rules man makes, the more become necessary. Just ask the Pharisees!

Cheers,

ozzie
IP: qaU4LdO9ECaHy8mx
EnglishmanRe: Restrictions
Ozzie,

I seem to remeber the WT society issuing an edict that DF`d ones could resume servants privileges after their 10th year back in harness. Prior to that once DF`d meant no privileges EVER.

Englishman.
IP: PsXXzgAyreWJyg54
ozziepostRe: Restrictions
Are you 'reaching out' englishman?

Cheers, Ozzie
IP: qaU4LdO9ECaHy8mx
EnglishmanRe: Restrictions
Ami reaching out?

No! Just retching at popmpous dubbisms!!! UUUUUURRRGGGHHH!!!

Englishman.
IP: PsXXzgAyreWJyg54
ozziepostRe: Restrictions
There, there, englishman! Calm down. It'll be all right in the morning. BTW how's the soccer today?

Ozzie (of the wide-awake midnight class)
IP: qaU4LdO9ECaHy8mx
ICHINGRe: Restrictions
ozzie - off the subject here - you mentioned you still go to meetings or have up until recently?

whats the latest regulations on jw's & the internet?

I-CHING
IP: MZQVIZk7IlIqcOt/
ICHINGRe: Restrictions
ozzie englishman - back on the subject:

on the other hand if you are of the "anointed" (can't believe i'm still using this BS jargon but anyway)

if you are of the anointed and get asked to leave the Org. (DF'D) and are then subsequently "repentant" etc and reinstated - you can still reclaim your business class reservation* in heaven up there beside JC can't you ?

i may be wrong but my impression at the momen is that this is in fact the case

does this mean it's say theoretically possible to be on restrictions and yet partake at the memorial?

*anointed status


I-CHING

(can you believe i used to believe this bullshit class)

Edited by - ICHING on 24 March 2001 8:34:22
IP: MZQVIZk7IlIqcOt/
thinkers wifeRe: Restrictions
Been there done that!!! Very humiliating. And counter productive. Cause' look where I am now.
TW
IP: hq/OC8wh7MH26g9D
zevRe: Restrictions
iching....here is a link to a thread on this subject http://206.61.99.151/forum/thread.asp?id=3063&site=3#39115 cheers

__
zev
Sitting on the Wrong Side of the Fence Class
IP: JD/wAmijR/LxKbfP
ICHINGRe: Restrictions
zev - hi - don't think we've spoken before - i read the click through to your post on internet danger - GREAT!!

i can't imagine the situation not getting to the point (though this may take a few years - when home computer/internet connection is as commonplace as a telephone or tv) - as was mentioned in the thread - jw's knock on someones door - person may be a "sheep like one" - they have a chat - place mags and so on - after the jw's have split - the "sheep like one" goes on line to research the JW's - finds all the dirty laundry on them - the permutations of possible outcomes is limitless but whichever way you look at it - it aint looking good for the wtbts -

i just think it's such beautiful poetic justice - the evolution of a technology that they cannot control - that poses a very real threat to their existance - as demonstrated by their pissweak efforts to counter it in the articles you posted -

not only that - i love the way the internet is taking them apart externally - (whose gonna convert after researching online?)
and internally - all the fascist views about the internet the wtbts publish within their own literature serves to foster curiosity amongst the faithful as well.

as a JW you are isolated - especially isolated within your fears and doubts - as you are not permitted to express these under threat of expulsion ( read: death at armageddon) as we are all only to well aware

(in the utilisation of this isolation technique to maintain control the wtbts is truly diabolical)


it's easy to think you're alone - BUT NOT ANYMORE

if the wtbts cannot keep the faithful isolated (impossible now with the advent of the internet ) it's essentially all over bar the shouting for them - it really is just a matter of time now i think

i cannot see how the situation will not evolve where the irrefutable evidence against the wtbts (online evidence) becomes so overwhelming - they just won't be able to bullshit their way out of it any longer
especially because the bulk of that evidence against them is courtesy of themselves.

this is so good because it makes them look so dumb -

i'm only speculating now but i reckon they've probably sat around in smug complacency there at crooklyn (to borrow a tallyman phrase) for the last decade or so waiting for this internet fad to fade into obscurity like the hula hoop or pet rocks etc.

WRONG!

judging by the articles you've posted reality is starting to set in

- way too little - far too late

i thought these guys were manning the watchtower - staying alert - keeping on guard - they must off been getting a very long manicure when the internet poked it's head over the horizon and then rode in at breakneck speed to completely surround them

with who nows how many new people connecting to the internet going online globally - daily

the demise of the wtbts is a beautiful scenario to watch unfold

THANK YOU SATAN FOR INVENTING THE INTERNET - (i mean he has to be responsible for it doesn't he?)

and who knows what blows the next phase of online technology will deal the wtbts - if they haven't sunk by then?

i'm predicting individual web tv - where individuals can essentially become online broadcasters programming their own content - much like a video conference situation -

and soon and so on

thanks zev

I-CHING
IP: QUp3Kh0tHmqvCcXy
MacHisloppRe: Restrictions
Hello Buscar,
just to tell how true I found your words,
in this subjetct I couldn't have said better!

"One elder with his lies can turn the whole Hall against you and you have no redress. You are told "we'll have to leave it in Jehovahs hand"

and

"All these restrictions, marking, dfing, are PUNISHMENT for daring to speak up against the elders. Love has nothing to do it. How are you loving your neighbour as yourself when you treat them like sh!t?"

The sad thing is that you are always told:
"wait on Jehovah"...but this it's only for
those who dare to speak up !!

Agape, J.C.MacHislopp
IP: cnQMnswdZuYu/TXO
hippikonRe: Restrictions
My restrictions were anounced from the platform. Everything that they could restrict was restricted - publicly. But hey Who Cares. Dont gives at rats arse about saying the closing prayer. "Thank you Santa for all the Bull$hit we have just digested". And as for answering they wouldnt like my answers much!
IP: gj4Fx+elsHf7jeMF